That it was a dumb idea?
- Feds91Stammer

Don't be a complete Richard.

NICE


Frank Seravalli
@frank_seravalli
·
29s
Hearing #NYR have made significant progress with newly acquired forward Barclay Goodrow.

Not finalized. Expectation is Goodrow will be a Blueshirt once the signing moratorium is lifted with a 6-year deal in $3.6m AAV range.
@DFOHockey
- jimbro83

Wait you actually like this?

NICE


Frank Seravalli
@frank_seravalli
·
29s
Hearing #NYR have made significant progress with newly acquired forward Barclay Goodrow.

Not finalized. Expectation is Goodrow will be a Blueshirt once the signing moratorium is lifted with a 6-year deal in $3.6m AAV range.
@DFOHockey
- jimbro83

Don't be a complete Richard.
- JRR1285

I was just joking. I actually like when someone can acknowledge when something is potentially a bad idea.

I was just joking. I actually like when someone can acknowledge when something is potentially a bad idea.
- Feds91Stammer

God I hate you.

Wait you actually like this?
- Feds91Stammer

I'm fine with it after seeing speculation he was gonna get 4.5 mil a year thats for sure

- eichiefs9

Hey, it's not Ladd bad.

(How the (frank) did you bumholes unload that Ladd contract?)

I'm fine with it after seeing speculation he was gonna get 4.5 mil a year thats for sure
- jimbro83

I just don’t see it. I’d give him 3 x 2m max.

Hey, it's not Ladd bad.

(How the (frank) did you bumholes unload that Ladd contract?)
- JRR1285

Actual money owed over the rest of the deal is minimal. He was due a $3M bonus and $1M salary over the last two years of the deal and I think I saw the Isles had already paid $1M of his bonus for this year. So he's only due $7M over the remainder of the deal and Arizona desperately needed draft picks and had to get to the cap floor.

I like Goodrow as a player but that AAV is about $1M high for my taste, if not more. Normally I'd crap on the term, but I think the exact same thing is going to happen with Cizikas.

I just don’t see it. I’d give him 3 x 2m max.
- Feds91Stammer

I somewhat agree, I don't see how his salary goes up that much with the current cap constraints. But I guess if the Rangers are going to publicly state what they are looking for and a player knows they fit the bill they can bend the Rangers over a barrel a little.

I just don’t see it. I’d give him 3 x 2m max.
- Feds91Stammer

be interesting to see the breakdown how the last two-three years are set up

I hope he's going be on the third line for that contract
https://twitter.com/frank...tatus/1417176647493726214

Actual money owed over the rest of the deal is minimal. He was due a $3M bonus and $1M salary over the last two years of the deal and I think I saw the Isles had already paid $1M of his bonus for this year. So he's only due $7M over the remainder of the deal and Arizona desperately needed draft picks and had to get to the cap floor.

I like Goodrow as a player but that AAV is about $1M high for my taste, if not more. Normally I'd crap on the term, but I think the exact same thing is going to happen with Cizikas.
- eichiefs9

@EvolvingWild model had four years at $3.15 mil. If go six, price expected to rise slightly. Market clearly will bear this given rumors of six years. Hope is cap rises enough at back end so smaller % of the overall. Not ideal but not unexpected. If four years, $4.5 mil or so

Jimbo Florida pick to be posted between 3-4 pm

I somewhat agree, I don't see how his salary goes up that much with the current cap constraints. But I guess if the Rangers are going to publicly state what they are looking for and a player knows they fit the bill they can bend the Rangers over a barrel a little.
- JRR1285

I just think he’s a solid 4th liner that benefitted from playing with Gourde and Coleman.

@EvolvingWild model had four years at $3.15 mil. If go six, price expected to rise slightly. Market clearly will bear this given rumors of six years. Hope is cap rises enough at back end so smaller % of the overall. Not ideal but not unexpected. If four years, $4.5 mil or so
- airjan23

Is their model based on actual on ice value or perceived value?

Is their model based on actual on ice value or perceived value?
- Feds91Stammer

Both and they are usually fairly spot on

I just think he’s a solid 4th liner that benefitted from playing with Gourde and Coleman.
- Feds91Stammer

Well now he might get the chance to benefit from playing with the likes of Panarin etc.

Both and they are usually fairly spot on
- airjan23

It does seem a little high but hopefully it looks better on the backend. Either way he seems like the right kind of guy to have around.

Well now he might get the chance to benefit from playing with the likes of Panarin etc.
- JRR1285

No it’s Goodrow not Gaudreau.

This way he never gets to put on a sweater for another team during an actual game.

League minimum, he already got his money.
- JRR1285

Exactly

It does seem a little high but hopefully it looks better on the backend. Either way he seems like the right kind of guy to have around.
- JRR1285

It seems like one of those deals that could be brutal by year 3 or 4.

That it was a dumb idea?
- Feds91Stammer

No it’s Goodrow not Gaudreau.
- Feds91Stammer

Yeah but some are theorizing he could be an energy/puck retrieval guy higher up in the lineup. I don't know how to feel about that but we'll see what happens. A sort of Jesper Fast 2.0.

Yeah but some are theorizing he could be an energy/puck retrieval guy higher up in the lineup. I don't know how to feel about that but we'll see what happens. A sort of Jesper Fast 2.0.
- JRR1285

And you know how much i wanted Fast to remain, especially at $2.25 mil per year