LordHumungous
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Greetings from the Humungous. Ayatollah of rock and rolla! Joined: 08.15.2014
|
|
|
I like the idea of NHL at the Olympics but they should skip next year. They can resume when it is safe. - VANTEL
lol
Man, The mountain bike park yesterday and two rounds of golf and I even shaved the beard. GF is pissed but I think my double-chin is gone so the facial hair had to go!! |
|
Marwood
|
|
|
Location: Cumberland, BC Joined: 03.18.2010
|
|
|
My girlfriend is from rural PA where open carry is a thing.. I've been to her family's weddings and children parties in their homes where they're open carrying. (frank)ing stupid. - NewYorkNuck
Nothing better than a heavily armed childrens party. |
|
1970vintage
Seattle Kraken |
|
|
Location: BC Joined: 11.11.2010
|
|
|
Nothing better than a heavily armed childrens party. - Marwood
It’s always the Clowns who are strapping. |
|
1970vintage
Seattle Kraken |
|
|
Location: BC Joined: 11.11.2010
|
|
|
It’s ok I’m not fully up on LTIR . Most of it not all of it. - Nighthawk
I wasn’t pointing fingers at you, just that the whole “how LTIR works” thing has been discussed numerous times and some people continue to suggest that it’s some kind of bonus. |
|
K-man25
Calgary Flames |
|
|
Location: K Town Joined: 09.02.2014
|
|
|
I wasn’t pointing fingers at you, just that the whole “how LTIR works” thing has been discussed numerous times and some people continue to suggest that it’s some kind of bonus. - 1970vintage
It was for Tampa. |
|
LordHumungous
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Greetings from the Humungous. Ayatollah of rock and rolla! Joined: 08.15.2014
|
|
|
It was for Tampa. - K-man25
lol |
|
bloatedmosquito
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: I’m a dose of reality in this cesspool of glee Joined: 10.22.2011
|
|
|
It was for Tampa. - K-man25
If you ain’t cheating, you ain’t trying. |
|
LordHumungous
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Greetings from the Humungous. Ayatollah of rock and rolla! Joined: 08.15.2014
|
|
|
If you ain’t cheating, you ain’t trying. - bloatedmosquito
True. Just ask Tom Brady and Belicheck. |
|
|
|
It was for Tampa. - K-man25
They are going to be a fun one to watch . 7 mil over with 22 signed. Will they have the balls to circumvent twice with the NHL watching?
|
|
NorthNuck
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Yellowknife, NWT Joined: 05.30.2016
|
|
|
Didn't JB get a couple assistants? I dunno. Could be only one as they look kinda the same.
- RealityChecker
This happened to my friend, except they did lay him off and kept the new employee |
|
NorthNuck
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Yellowknife, NWT Joined: 05.30.2016
|
|
|
They are going to be a fun one to watch . 7 mil over with 22 signed. Will they have the balls to circumvent twice with the NHL watching? - VANTEL
Yes. |
|
|
|
Yes. - NorthNuck
I hope so
|
|
RealityChecker
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: I stay away from the completely crazy rumours on the internet.I will occasionally debunk them-Eklund Joined: 04.18.2010
|
|
|
Yes. - NorthNuck
and if the whiners want to complain, they can show off their two rings on their middle fingers. |
|
|
|
They are going to be a fun one to watch . 7 mil over with 22 signed. Will they have the balls to circumvent twice with the NHL watching? - VANTEL
I mean that's precisely why they got the Seabrook contract for the next 3 years isn't it? I don't think it's about having balls anymore. NHL made the rules, teams found loopholes, and they're going to challenge them until rules are changed. |
|
|
|
I mean that's precisely why they got the Seabrook contract for the next 3 years isn't it? I don't think it's about having balls anymore. NHL made the rules, teams found loopholes, and they're going to challenge them until rules are changed. - Brooks_Light
Yeah but at any given time the NHL steps in and says we are going to get you . Canucks did nothing different than what 10 other teams did with sliding contracts. After a while the league stepped in and said there is going to be payback. |
|
1970vintage
Seattle Kraken |
|
|
Location: BC Joined: 11.11.2010
|
|
|
I mean that's precisely why they got the Seabrook contract for the next 3 years isn't it? I don't think it's about having balls anymore. NHL made the rules, teams found loopholes, and they're going to challenge them until rules are changed. - Brooks_Light
The Seabrook contract doesn’t really help them the way the Kucherov injury did. Seabrook won’t play any games (playoffs or otherwise). What it did was help them get out of Tyler J’s contract. |
|
1970vintage
Seattle Kraken |
|
|
Location: BC Joined: 11.11.2010
|
|
|
Yeah but at any given time the NHL steps in and says we are going to get you . Canucks did nothing different than what 10 other teams did with sliding contracts. After a while the league stepped in and said there is going to be payback. - VANTEL
All those teams had the same risks, they just took steps to get out of it. The Wild will have $15m in dead cap space in 2022 because they were worried it would be worse if Parise/Suter retired early. |
|
|
|
|
|
All those teams had the same risks, they just took steps to get out of it. The Wild will have $15m in dead cap space in 2022 because they were worried it would be worse if Parise/Suter retired early. - 1970vintage
What I found funny was the NHL was pissed at the GMs for finding loopholes , changed the laws and the GMs found loopholes to get out of the discipline . Almost like a game a game of cat and mouse.
If Gillis would have listened to DCT and bought out Lu instead of Ballard we could have all been sitting here finding other ways to abuse the capspace. |
|
RealityChecker
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: I stay away from the completely crazy rumours on the internet.I will occasionally debunk them-Eklund Joined: 04.18.2010
|
|
|
You will enjoy this article.
https://thehockeywriters....-circumvention-solutions/ - Reubenkincade
the cap is just like the tax code, you follow it to the bare minimum you have to and hope to exploit as many loopholes as you can.
sure, the authorities (league in this case) can tighten them up but individuals will still find other "creative" solutions.
the concept of making this "a level playing field" for all teams is a fallacy. things will never be completely level. |
|
1970vintage
Seattle Kraken |
|
|
Location: BC Joined: 11.11.2010
|
|
|
What I found funny was the NHL was pissed at the GMs for finding loopholes , changed the laws and the GMs found loopholes to get out of the discipline . Almost like a game a game of cat and mouse.
If Gillis would have listened to DCT and bought out Lu instead of Ballard we could have all been sitting here finding other ways to abuse the capspace. - VANTEL
Yup. Or if the Canucks had thrown Fla a sweetener to get Lu on LTIR the last few years of the deal, and a job at NHL head office instead of with the Cats, he could have gotten exec experience and not caused cap recapture. |
|
|
|
Elliotte Friedman
@FriedgeHNIC
·
35m
DET & Jakub Vrana settle with a 3x$5.25M extension |
|
|
|
the cap is just like the tax code, you follow it to the bare minimum you have to and hope to exploit as many loopholes as you can.
sure, the authorities (league in this case) can tighten them up but individuals will still find other "creative" solutions.
the concept of making this "a level playing field" for all teams is a fallacy. things will never be completely level. - RealityChecker
I am not disagreeing about the level playing field, or lack of one. I have never liked the cap anyways, so if a team or teams find ways around it, so be it, but don't turn around later, when a team does something to spread out cap over several years and retroactively ding them.
Teams like Tampa, Toronto, Chicago and any Lou Lamariello team have always found ways around the rules, without breaking the rules.
|
|
RealityChecker
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: I stay away from the completely crazy rumours on the internet.I will occasionally debunk them-Eklund Joined: 04.18.2010
|
|
|
I am not disagreeing about the level playing field, or lack of one. I have never liked the cap anyways, so if a team or teams find ways around it, so be it, but don't turn around later, when a team does something to spread out cap over several years and retroactively ding them.
Teams like Tampa, Toronto, Chicago and any Lou Lamariello team have always found ways around the rules, without breaking the rules. - Reubenkincade
100%
the re-capture penalty bothers me more than most things the league has done. i accept a certain level of BS within the league but the cap re-capture was a brand new level of utter fcukery!
my contempt has little to do with the canucks but rather in penalizing an action for something that you previously approved. by allowing the contracts to be filed with the league, the league explicitly (or implicitly at the very least) implies that it is "legal." you can't go back and reverse the decision to punish people.
the fact that the owners approved and allowed this to happen shows the mickey mouse level of the nhl. |
|
|
|
100%
the re-capture penalty bothers me more than most things the league has done. i accept a certain level of BS within the league but the cap re-capture was a brand new level of utter fcukery!
it has little to do with the canucks but rather in penalizing an action for something that you previously approved. by allowing the contracts to be filed with the league, the league explicitly (or implicitly at the very least) implies that it is "legal." you can't go back and reverse the decision to punish people.
the fact that the owners approved and allowed this to happen shows the mickey mouse level of the nhl. - RealityChecker
Well said.
Here is a different view on the Tampa situation.
https://www.si.com/hockey...ews/nhl-cap-circumvention |
|