|
|
We only need Petey play like he can. I’ve harped on the special teams since preseason being what holds us back. - Nighthawk
We need a RHC . Petey does not take faceoffs. Miller probably wont be around long so we need a top center.
|
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
We need a RHC . Petey does not take faceoffs. Miller probably wont be around long so we need a top center. - VANTEL
Petey is a top C. Idc if someone else takes FO’s. He has to work on it in practice & the offseason. Sutter once healthy is a RHC. Miller is tbd. |
|
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: MB Joined: 01.21.2012
|
|
|
We only need Petey play like he can. I’ve harped on the special teams since preseason being what holds us back. - Nighthawk
Petey needs to gain strength. Too easily pushed off the puck. Not saying put in 25 lbs a muscle during the summer but gotta start to fill out more and more every year. |
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
Petey needs to gain strength. Too easily pushed off the puck. Not saying put in 25 lbs a muscle during the summer but gotta start to fill out more and more every year. - manvanfan
He needs to be stronger on his feet. It’s not as simple as get stronger. Players have differing quick/slow muscle mass. |
|
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: MB Joined: 01.21.2012
|
|
|
I got an afternoon nap in to be able to stay up for the game tonight. |
|
|
|
Petey is a top C. Idc if someone else takes FO’s. He has to work on it in practice & the offseason. Sutter once healthy is a RHC. Miller is tbd. - Nighthawk
Sutter may not even play this year He is also not a long term solution. |
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
Sutter may not even play this year He is also not a long term solution. - VANTEL
Maybe so but my reply stands lol |
|
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: MB Joined: 01.21.2012
|
|
|
Sutter may not even play this year He is also not a long term solution. - VANTEL
Costmar, Zhukenov, Forsell, Lockhart and Jasek are all right handed centers. |
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
Costmar, Zhukenov, Forsell, Lockhart and Jasek are all right handed centers. - manvanfan
Wow & in a heavily lefty dominated sport. Hope 1-2 pan out. |
|
|
|
Maybe so but my reply stands lol - Nighthawk
Your reply is so wrong
Canucks need to get a lot better at faceoffs . Possession is top priority.
Petey will be a top center if he learns to take face offs , gets going , stays upright , and gets stronger. Does that really sound like a top center?
Bo is the only center right now that is meeting expectations.
|
|
|
|
Costmar, Zhukenov, Forsell, Lockhart and Jasek are all right handed centers. - manvanfan
A top 6 RHC would be nice . I thought Lockhart had a good training camp and his release is very quick. Costmar I can see a fourth line C.
|
|
1970vintage
Seattle Kraken |
|
|
Location: BC Joined: 11.11.2010
|
|
|
Thanks Carol, even with Big Mac missing this is still a good team. Should make the boys feel good when they whip them! 4-2 Canucks, Rathbone with his first.
|
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
Your reply is so wrong
Canucks need to get a lot better at faceoffs . Possession is top priority.
Petey will be a top center if he learns to take face offs , gets going , stays upright , and gets stronger. Does that really sound like a top center?
Bo is the only center right now that is meeting expectations. - VANTEL
What do you want back if traded? |
|
|
|
What do you want back if traded? - Nighthawk
I didn't say trade him . I said Canucks need a top 6 center. If he doesn't improve in the next year and a half sure then look at a trade. I think move him to the wing .
|
|
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: MB Joined: 01.21.2012
|
|
|
A top 6 RHC would be nice . I thought Lockhart had a good training camp and his release is very quick. Costmar I can see a fourth line C. - VANTEL
Costmar doesn't seem to have taken a step forward from last season, which is disappointing.
Lockhart only has points in 3 out of 9 games this season. Doesn't seem to be taking face-offs though so doubt he becomes an NHL centre, even though he's listed as a centre.
I know drafting prospects is tough and hitting on one per draft is okay, 2 players is good, 3 is great but I don't know if JB and his scouts can find what necessary compliment players in the later rounds anymore. A lot of the prospects seems to be the same type of players that aren't getting to the NHL level. |
|
1970vintage
Seattle Kraken |
|
|
Location: BC Joined: 11.11.2010
|
|
|
I would like to give my respects to all the veterans that paid the ultimate sacrifice that allow all of us to enjoy our freedoms. And a huge thank you to all in the military past and present, you have my respect also. - Makita
Hey Mak, appreciate your service! Working hard or hardly working?
🍻 |
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
I didn't say trade him . I said Canucks need a top 6 center. If he doesn't improve in the next year and a half sure then look at a trade. I think move him to the wing . - VANTEL
Turn him into a Kane Panarin type?
Canucks need special teams that aren’t in the bottom 1/2 of the league.
Stud RHD the biggest priority.
Top 6 RHC are rare & harder to trade for. |
|
|
|
Thanks Carol.
And Thanks Makita, those were very good words, to start the comments section
|
|
|
|
Costmar doesn't seem to have taken a step forward from last season, which is disappointing.
Lockhart only has points in 3 out of 9 games this season. Doesn't seem to be taking face-offs though so doubt he becomes an NHL centre, even though he's listed as a centre.
I know drafting prospects is tough and hitting on one per draft is okay, 2 players is good, 3 is great but I don't know if JB and his scouts can find what necessary compliment players in the later rounds anymore. A lot of the prospects seems to be the same type of players that aren't getting to the NHL level. - manvanfan
Yeah Lockhart played wing the game I seen.
Two years ago Costmar had a very good year but has regressed as you said.
|
|
boonerbuck
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Not Quesnel, BC Joined: 10.11.2005
|
|
|
Your reply is so wrong
Canucks need to get a lot better at faceoffs . Possession is top priority.
Petey will be a top center if he learns to take face offs , gets going , stays upright , and gets stronger. Does that really sound like a top center?
Bo is the only center right now that is meeting expectations. - VANTEL
I agree with all of this.
|
|
|
|
Turn him into a Kane Panarin type?
Canucks need special teams that aren’t in the bottom 1/2 of the league.
Stud RHD the biggest priority.
Top 6 RHC are rare & harder to trade for. - Nighthawk
Right now we are bottom 10 and there are a lot of centers at this years draft.
|
|
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: MB Joined: 01.21.2012
|
|
|
Yeah Lockhart played wing the game I seen.
Two years ago Costmar had a very good year but has regressed as you said. - VANTEL
I said he didn't take a step forward
Hoglander had 14 points in 23 games as a 20 year old.
As a 20 year old Costmar has 2 points in 14 games which is only slight up from his 1 points in 22 games last season.
Jasek is 24 will be 25 when next season starts but is playing all situations in Liiga and is a point per game.
He would probably be the closets prospect the Canucks have to a right handed 4lc. |
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
Right now we are bottom 10 and there are a lot of centers at this years draft. - VANTEL
I always go C unless D is top 2 calibre. As for bottom 10 makes no diff to me this early on. Imo they are still trying to hit their stride & sustain it if referencing the standings. Special teams namely the PP will improve but on the PK we don’t have the horses. |
|
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: MB Joined: 01.21.2012
|
|
|
I always go C unless D is top 2 calibre. As for bottom 10 makes no diff to me this early on. Imo they are still trying to hit their stride & sustain it if referencing the standings. Special teams namely the PP will improve but on the PK we don’t have the horses. - Nighthawk
BPA |
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
BPA - manvanfan
Wingers have to stand out & be legit top 3. Explains why they drop. Depending where we draft dictates what BPA is. |
|