I think Lavenduh Panduh is PT21's new burner account.
- Letterkenney

What did PT do now ?

What did PT do now ?
- Angus4444

His usual stuff like throwing insults at MJL's mother. But really, I have no idea if he's in HB jail or not. I was just poking fun by saying the new troll around here, LP, is PT's burner account with a phony Chinese version of English.

I logged in expecting to see genial back and forth... today not so much.

I logged in expecting to see genial back and forth... today not so much.
- Gogol

It's ALWAYS genial here at Flyers Buzz.

Is this Yeo's job to lose or do you guys think they should pick up the pace in finding a permanent coach?
- Pelle31Forever

I would let Yeo finish out the year and see how he does. Then in the offseason once team management figures out what direction they want and need to go, i.e. more tweaks or full reset, then you hire the appropriate coach. And that may be Yeo depending on how he does this year. So far I like his demeanor and he seems to have really good hockey knowledge.

I would prefer that they not rush.
- NC Flyers Fan

Good point. Poor choice of words from me. Probably should have asked about Yeo and ended it.

Don’t even fire AV it won’t change anything! Haha you are pathetic. It was an argument with MJL go and look it up. I do think Laughton is a better player than Brassard. Not man enough to stand up to you the mighty keyboard warrior! Get over yourself man, you constantly spew crap on this site and ramble on aimlessly.
- ClaudeFather

So let get this right, so I’m being fair and seeing things from your perspective.

You don’t recall a debate between you and I about Brassard being the more gifted offensive player and me claiming Laughton wasn’t very creative offensively. Than later that night Laughton making that dump play that led to a goal for his first assist of the season. For a guy who was just “chiming in”, you were pretty quick to rub it in “creativity”, even if it’s probably the most creative play Laughton has made all season, if not his entire career. I’d think very hard about this, it won’t be hard to find this conversation and repost it and if you’re so sure, why won’t you look it up? I mean at least I’m at work.

I’m really happy, that you’re happy we’re winning the games we should be winning.

I for one am happy to see them winning - against poopty teams or not. Strange how I just enjoy watching them WIN!

They are missing 3 players. Eichel who was injured when added, NoPa and Roy. The Flyers have more injured players. Also Lehner has not been good this season. The fact they played their backup would not have changed the results. If you cant win games with your backup goalie, whats the point of having one?
- xShoot4WarAmpsx

Are you sure? Because the Aves played an unknown in the NHL and still beat us. You don’t know this as fact and Vegas made the deal they did because they didn’t have a great start to the season.

Is this Yeo's job to lose or do you guys think they should pick up the pace in finding a permanent coach?
- Pelle31Forever

Trotz if he is let go

I think Lavenduh Panduh is PT21's new burner account.
- Letterkenney

lol but doesn't seem like his style. More likely it's someone who I ignore regularly, as I will do with the LP account.

So winning is the great deodorant... But three in a row with one decent opponent doesn't change anything. When Ellis and Bee are back the team Fletcher assembled can be judged. Hope I'm wrong but too little too late

I for one am happy to see them winning - against poopty teams or not. Strange how I just enjoy watching them WIN!

- FlyersGrace

yea but it's not sustainable

lol but doesn't seem like his style. More likely it's someone who I ignore regularly, as I will do with the LP account.
- Scoob

I don't know if it's PT but it's within the realm of probability knowing him. And I did find out that PT is actually banned or in HB jail. MJL is in HB jail for a week. The 2 of them had another spat. The mommies at HB sent them to their rooms and grounded them.

I don't know if it's PT but it's within the realm of probability knowing him. And I did find out that PT is actually banned or in HB jail. MJL is in HB jail for a week. The 2 of them had another spat. The mommies at HB sent them to their rooms and grounded them.
- Letterkenney

Arizona listening on Jacob Chychrun. Only 23, stud d man? Should Flyers be involved?

I don't know if it's PT but it's within the realm of probability knowing him. And I did find out that PT is actually banned or in HB jail. MJL is in HB jail for a week. The 2 of them had another spat. The mommies at HB sent them to their rooms and grounded them.
- Letterkenney

Sure doesnt sound like PT maybe "hello its me 2050"? aka Rinaldo. MJL has been absent today too.

Arizona listening on Jacob Chychrun. Only 23, stud d man? Should Flyers be involved?
- landros 2

He is having an absolutely horrid disaster of a year. 2 goals 5 assists and -29 on 24:51 in ice time. On IR right now with an upper body injury.

Maybe Arizona will be dumb enough to part with him but I still think the price will be high.

Arizona listening on Jacob Chychrun. Only 23, stud d man? Should Flyers be involved?
- landros 2

They definitely should be involved. I thought he would be the one guy they would keep to build around.

Sure doesnt sound like PT maybe "hello its me 2050"? aka Rinaldo. MJL has been absent today too.
- bradster

About time the board become enjoyable again.

About time the board become enjoyable again.
- Robert's Plant

Ya usually theres some arguing first thing in the morning. Was nice to not have that.

Interesting, when I look up this new username I'm surprised to see it's shared on a IP address linked to another username that was banned very recently.

So you get banned and think it's funny or cute to create this new schtick, I don't.
- Makita

Good afternoon,

I have no interest in contesting any ban or getting involved in any disputes in the realm of the personal. In the list of the top 100 things of my life, participation here would rank 501st. My apologies for the "shtick", and that you did not find it amusing. I tried, but I was really hoping to provoke a public encounter such as this with the administrators of this site.

Now, since you truly have my attention in the middle of a very busy day, would you please read this very carefully, and bring it to the attention of the people who exercise authority of the running of this site, and while this post might be deleted, I will be taking a screenshot of it, and it will stand as testament to an uncontestable message.

This site is filled with people posting certain opinions about Covid. I will be as charitable as I can with what I term such "opinions", so let me simply say that these opinions have no scientific, institutional or (with the recent FDA approvals), legal basis in fact. There are multiple such posts on this thread even today. No other site that I know of allows this.

I wish I could call such a social media policy insignificant, even in an infrequently visited, lighthearted site such as this. I wish I could just adopt a laissez faire approach to it. Unfortunately, considerable evidence exists that it is not, and one shouldn't.

The moderators, such as you, who police the petty fights and name-calling allow many such posts to stand. I do understand that you cannot and possibly should not weed out every violation of rule and reason or personal opinion, but I have carefully garnered at least 20 such incidents over the past 6 months that have stood for weeks with the poster continuing to post daily since. This is in spite of the fact that you do not actually have to take a stand, if you don't want to, about the accuracy of the opinions or about freedom of speech. You can simply invoke the COC, and the irrelevance to Hockey.

Let me now direct you to your Terms of Use. I specifically direct your attention to two key phrasings, which I am highlighting below (circled). Your definition of "Contents", and use of the phrase "Reasonable Efforts."



Please note your definition of "Contents" of the site is not restricted in your own language to the output of bloggers and moderators and so on. It may thus be used to imply all content that is publicly available, including all posts made here, certainly all that persists for days and weeks. Please also note that the examples I refer to here provide, at least prima facie, evidence that you are in fact NOT engaging in reasonable efforts to maintain the accuracy you promise in the Terms of Use.

I specifically shelled out for a subscription this summer with the very real possibility of this moment in mind. We now have a contract, implicit or otherwise. My purpose in seeking legal redress or bringing violations of this contract to the attention of appropriate consumer commerce regulating bodies would not be to recoup the insignificant subscription fees or be a jerk. It would be to use that avenue as a way to bring publicity to the way you moderate it, specifically with regards to the greatest public health emergency in a century. If your approach is that you have done nothing wrong, then well, surely you will embrace this publicity.

My truly sincerest apology for this heavy handed message. Considerable thought and exasperation precede it. I have been a member of this community for almost 14 years now, and was probably barely noticed before the pandemic. As an aside, my original ban was received because of admittedly intemperate language in a Covid discussion, where I was frankly filling in for what should have been your job to do. Not only do you have a haphazard attitude towards "accuracy," you actually punish the people who step into this gap if they breach standards of your decorum.

My very best.

So let get this right, so I’m being fair and seeing things from your perspective.

You don’t recall a debate between you and I about Brassard being the more gifted offensive player and me claiming Laughton wasn’t very creative offensively. Than later that night Laughton making that dump play that led to a goal for his first assist of the season. For a guy who was just “chiming in”, you were pretty quick to rub it in “creativity”, even if it’s probably the most creative play Laughton has made all season, if not his entire career. I’d think very hard about this, it won’t be hard to find this conversation and repost it and if you’re so sure, why won’t you look it up? I mean at least I’m at work.

I’m really happy, that you’re happy we’re winning the games we should be winning.
- SuperSchennBros

The conversation you had was with MJL
Man, stop talking to me. You can look it up.

Now we know he is PT.



Chinese Sheldon in the house.

The conversation you had was with MJL
Man, stop talking to me. You can look it up.
- ClaudeFather

I haven’t had a conversation with MJL in literal years. He won’t respond to my posts under any circumstances. What’s so hard to understand about this?

You’re doing all the tough talking and name calling. You laid out the challenge. If you’re so sure you just “chimed in”, which you never leave anything at one post, by all means, present that evidence. If you won’t and are unsure of yourself, I’ll do it myself as soon as I have the free time.