Wanna blog? Start your own hockey blog with My HockeyBuzz. Register for free today!
 
Forums :: Blog World :: Jan Levine: Rangers rally to defeat Leafs, face Hurricanes with first place on line
Author Message
TPC
New York Rangers
Location: Bucks County, PA
Joined: 01.18.2008

Jan 21 @ 9:37 PM ET
What the frank are they doing at center ice
irishgerm
New York Rangers
Joined: 12.02.2021

Jan 21 @ 9:37 PM ET
You all know the only reason D’Angelo isn’t in NY was because he liked Trump who is from NY , go figure
monty burns
Location: wake forest, NC
Joined: 10.18.2005

Jan 21 @ 9:57 PM ET
You all know the only reason D’Angelo isn’t in NY was because he liked Trump who is from NY , go figure
- irishgerm


thanks for d'Angelo, he's putting up dougie hamilton numbers at 1/8 the cost
BINGO!
Carolina Hurricanes
Location: I'll always remember the last words my grandfather ever told me. He said, "A Truck!", SK
Joined: 09.21.2009

Jan 21 @ 10:38 PM ET
That's the Tony D on defense I remember
- TPC




There's a reason the underlying numbers on the Canes D have dropped significantly.
nyrangers2
Joined: 07.09.2009

Jan 21 @ 10:40 PM ET
thanks for d'Angelo, he's putting up dougie hamilton numbers at 1/8 the cost
- monty burns


Enjoy the one year you’ll have him
aecliptic
New York Rangers
Location: Stacheville
Joined: 06.17.2010

Jan 21 @ 11:25 PM ET
You all know the only reason D’Angelo isn’t in NY was because he liked Trump who is from NY , go figure
- irishgerm


If only you could get a grain of salt under your toe nail.
fourtrax23
New York Rangers
Joined: 12.17.2008

Jan 22 @ 9:19 AM ET
Well, let's hope we don't meet them in the playoffs. The Canes are probably the only team out there I don't think there's a chance for NYR beating in 7. Whoever goes up against them better bring it physically to break that suffocating 5v5. Never fails that ex-Rangers show up huge against them.
TC88
New York Rangers
Joined: 10.24.2020

Jan 22 @ 11:22 AM ET
Curious when moves will start taking place around the league. Know a lot of conversation has taken place around the Rangers needing a top 9 C and a top 6 RW but I’m starting to wonder if a better option could be two top 6 RWs. One rental and one with term left. Don’t really feel center is that big of an issue now that Zib has awoken and is winning draws. Honestly like the sound of a 3rd line of:

Laf-Goodrow-Kakko

Think they would have strong possession numbers and score some dirty goals. You could also trust them with 12-15 minutes a night which is crucial as the season moves on and in playoffs.
aecliptic
New York Rangers
Location: Stacheville
Joined: 06.17.2010

Jan 22 @ 12:05 PM ET
Curious when moves will start taking place around the league. Know a lot of conversation has taken place around the Rangers needing a top 9 C and a top 6 RW but I’m starting to wonder if a better option could be two top 6 RWs. One rental and one with term left. Don’t really feel center is that big of an issue now that Zib has awoken and is winning draws. Honestly like the sound of a 3rd line of:

Laf-Goodrow-Kakko

Think they would have strong possession numbers and score some dirty goals. You could also trust them with 12-15 minutes a night which is crucial as the season moves on and in playoffs.

- TC88


People seem very convinced that we will go after Kessel. If we add that to the Miller rumors were looking at...

Kreider, Zib, Kessel
Panarin, Miller, Strome
TC88
New York Rangers
Joined: 10.24.2020

Jan 22 @ 12:15 PM ET
People seem very convinced that we will go after Kessel. If we add that to the Miller rumors were looking at...

Kreider, Zib, Kessel
Panarin, Miller, Strome

- aecliptic


That looks like an improved top 6 to me. Just wonder how Strome would adjust to wing. Likely fine but worth mentioning. The cost of Miller is a bit worrisome too and likely means no Strome next season.

What about:

Kreider, Zib, R.Smith
Panarin, Strome, Kessel
Laf, Goodrow, Kakko
aecliptic
New York Rangers
Location: Stacheville
Joined: 06.17.2010

Jan 22 @ 12:30 PM ET
That looks like an improved top 6 to me. Just wonder how Strome would adjust to wing. Likely fine but worth mentioning. The cost of Miller is a bit worrisome too and likely means no Strome next season.

What about:

Kreider, Zib, R.Smith
Panarin, Strome, Kessel
Laf, Goodrow, Kakko

- TC88


With 50% retention on Miller we can keep Strome as long as he is friendly to us in his asking price. If not, then so be it, would be kind of a bummer however Miller is the better of the 2 overall. However Strome's leadership will be missed.
aecliptic
New York Rangers
Location: Stacheville
Joined: 06.17.2010

Jan 22 @ 12:31 PM ET
That looks like an improved top 6 to me. Just wonder how Strome would adjust to wing. Likely fine but worth mentioning. The cost of Miller is a bit worrisome too and likely means no Strome next season.

What about:

Kreider, Zib, R.Smith
Panarin, Strome, Kessel
Laf, Goodrow, Kakko

- TC88


It works, it fills gaps, its definitely the cheaper route to go as far as what it costs us trade wise.
Brukie
New York Rangers
Location: Putnam, NY
Joined: 06.14.2011

Jan 22 @ 12:35 PM ET
That looks like an improved top 6 to me. Just wonder how Strome would adjust to wing. Likely fine but worth mentioning. The cost of Miller is a bit worrisome too and likely means no Strome next season.

What about:

Kreider, Zib, R.Smith
Panarin, Strome, Kessel
Laf, Goodrow, Kakko

- TC88



So you think adding more scoring is the way to go, not playing better defensively??
TC88
New York Rangers
Joined: 10.24.2020

Jan 22 @ 12:38 PM ET
With 50% retention on Miller we can keep Strome as long as he is friendly to us in his asking price. If not, then so be it, would be kind of a bummer however Miller is the better of the 2 overall. However Strome's leadership will be missed.
- aecliptic


If 50% retained happened id be all for it. Losing Miller in that trade initially has always been a head scratcher so would love to bring him back.

If that does happen and a second player is acquired I’d prefer Smith over Kessel by a large margin.

But then we’re talking about losing 5-6 quality assets at once.
aecliptic
New York Rangers
Location: Stacheville
Joined: 06.17.2010

Jan 22 @ 12:39 PM ET
So you think adding more scoring is the way to go, not playing better defensively??
- Brukie


This is why Im not a fan of the Kessel pick up.
aecliptic
New York Rangers
Location: Stacheville
Joined: 06.17.2010

Jan 22 @ 12:43 PM ET
If 50% retained happened id be all for it. Losing Miller in that trade initially has always been a head scratcher so would love to bring him back.

If that does happen and a second player is acquired I’d prefer Smith over Kessel by a large margin.

But then we’re talking about losing 5-6 quality assets at once.

- TC88


We would likely loose Chytil (is whatever, not a game changer for us), Lundkvist (would be nice to see him grow here, however our right side is locked up) and a 1st for Miller who has been a PPG player for a couple years now. Were not really losing anything out of our lineup to make this trade happen.

I think Smith is definitely the better option, however, Vegas keeps pushing back the date when Eichel will return, plus they have Pacc's on IR as well so they may not have a need to move Smith and will do a Tampa.
TC88
New York Rangers
Joined: 10.24.2020

Jan 22 @ 12:44 PM ET
So you think adding more scoring is the way to go, not playing better defensively??
- Brukie


A change or 2 on LD is probably needed also if they are really going for it this year.

But as far as offense, yes I do think that’s an improved top 9 both offensively and defensively overall. The Panarin-Strome-Kessel line would likely have some poor moments but can guarantee they would still have a positive +/-
Brukie
New York Rangers
Location: Putnam, NY
Joined: 06.14.2011

Jan 22 @ 12:48 PM ET
A change or 2 on LD is probably needed also if they are really going for it this year.

But as far as offense, yes I do think that’s an improved top 9 both offensively and defensively overall. The Panarin-Strome-Kessel line would likely have some poor moments but can guarantee they would still have a positive +/-

- TC88


So you want to add four pieces to this line up??
OLDSCHOOL#6
New York Rangers
Joined: 10.14.2007

Jan 22 @ 12:49 PM ET
This is why Im not a fan of the Kessel pick up.
- aecliptic

I’m not convinced a rental is the way to go. I think this team is good, but has holes, as most teams do, save Carolina.

What purpose will it really serve to bring in Kessel and Smith? Give them top 6 minutes, and then give those minutes back to Kakko and Chytil even though they haven’t earned it,

I’m all for Drury making a couple of deals, but a pure rental doesn’t make sense.

TC88
New York Rangers
Joined: 10.24.2020

Jan 22 @ 12:54 PM ET
So you want to add four pieces to this line up??
- Brukie


Could see 3. Not unheard of. Why not go for it? I think the deficiencies of the team are pretty obvious and you can solve most with 3 moves.

-Two top lines that click
-A 3rd line with a purpose
-No more Nemeth

Let’s hear your ideas.
aecliptic
New York Rangers
Location: Stacheville
Joined: 06.17.2010

Jan 22 @ 12:54 PM ET
I’m not convinced a rental is the way to go. I think this team is good, but has holes, as most teams do, save Carolina.

What purpose will it really serve to bring in Kessel and Smith? Give them top 6 minutes, and then give those minutes back to Kakko and Chytil even though they haven’t earned it,

I’m all for Drury making a couple of deals, but a pure rental doesn’t make sense.

- OLDSCHOOL#6


I think Miller is probably the way to go as we know we will have him for 2 years, but we need that retention.

The other option Id like, as Ive beaten to death before, is a trade for Dylan Strome and Calvin De Haan. It gives us a good, young 3C (with the potential to be a 2C) we can resign and doesnt cause a totally blow things up. De Haan is our LD rental. Then if the team decides they want to pursue the big name rental, they have that option.
aecliptic
New York Rangers
Location: Stacheville
Joined: 06.17.2010

Jan 22 @ 12:55 PM ET
Could see 3. Not unheard of. Why not go for it? I think the deficiencies of the team are pretty obvious and you can solve most with 3 moves.

-Two top lines that click
-A 3rd line with a purpose
-No more Nemeth

Let’s hear your ideas.

- TC88


He doesnt have ideas, he wants to sit on his hands and let it all marinate.
OLDSCHOOL#6
New York Rangers
Joined: 10.14.2007

Jan 22 @ 1:01 PM ET
I think Miller is probably the way to go as we know we will have him for 2 years, but we need that retention.

The other option Id like, as Ive beaten to death before, is a trade for Dylan Strome and Calvin De Haan. It gives us a good, young 3C (with the potential to be a 2C) we can resign and doesnt cause a totally blow things up. De Haan is our LD rental. Then if the team decides they want to pursue the big name rental, they have that option.

- aecliptic

I definitely like the Miller idea for the reasons you stated. Don’t know much about D. Strome, but it makes sense if he can upgrade the 3C.

Brukie
New York Rangers
Location: Putnam, NY
Joined: 06.14.2011

Jan 22 @ 1:02 PM ET
He doesnt have ideas, he wants to sit on his hands and let it all marinate.
- aecliptic


Yep, 2 forwards and a defense man or 2, these moves you are proposing will empty the cupboards for sure and isnt a sure fire way to win the Cup.
Brukie
New York Rangers
Location: Putnam, NY
Joined: 06.14.2011

Jan 22 @ 1:04 PM ET
He doesnt have ideas, he wants to sit on his hands and let it all marinate.
- aecliptic


You are right, Im am idiot and you are a (frank)ing wonder.
Page: Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21  Next