Wanna blog? Start your own hockey blog with My HockeyBuzz. Register for free today!
 
Forums :: Blog World :: Carol Schram: Canucks will be without Quinn Hughes, Matthew Highmore as they resume play
Author Message
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Canuckville, BC
Joined: 01.09.2015

Feb 9 @ 1:38 PM ET
47x2=94pts
Where did this 48pts out of 100 come from?

- Retinalz

3pt games
LordHumungous
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Greetings from the Humungous. Ayatollah of rock and rolla!
Joined: 08.15.2014

Feb 9 @ 1:49 PM ET
Goalies these days are such pussies. They would've needed the jaws of life to get me off of him after the first shot, let alone him waving a stick like that.
- Load Management

Could you imagine if he did that to Billy Smith?

lol
Retinalz
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Vancouver, BC
Joined: 01.31.2015

Feb 9 @ 1:52 PM ET
3pt games
- Nighthawk

So nowhere that counts. .500 is based off the maximum points we could have. 94pts is the max we could have, therefor that is the threshold. This 100pts you mentioned doesn't exist.
NewYorkNuck
Vancouver Canucks
Location: New York, NY
Joined: 07.11.2015

Feb 9 @ 1:54 PM ET
Who (frank)ing cares about their hit totals. One core is soft and talented, the other is soft and mediocre.
- CanuckDon


Both are soft, ain't arguing that, but we know only one is talented enough for the second round
NewYorkNuck
Vancouver Canucks
Location: New York, NY
Joined: 07.11.2015

Feb 9 @ 1:54 PM ET
So nowhere that counts. .500 is based off the maximum points we could have. 94pts is the max we could have, therefor that is the threshold. This 100pts you mentioned doesn't exist.
- Retinalz


I think Lordy has been teaching him math
CanuckDon
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Las Vegas
Joined: 08.05.2014

Feb 9 @ 2:03 PM ET
Both are soft, ain't arguing that, but we know only one is talented enough for the second round
- NewYorkNuck

I’d trade our next 5 first round picks to make the second round. Please don’t make me GM
Retinalz
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Vancouver, BC
Joined: 01.31.2015

Feb 9 @ 2:07 PM ET
I think Lordy has been teaching him math
- NewYorkNuck

Must have. 3 pt games doesn't mean a team gets 3 pts... the formula still remains gp x 2 = max points. Then total points x max points = points percentage.

47x2=94
48÷94= .511(rounded up from .5106382979 if you want to be exact)
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Canuckville, BC
Joined: 01.09.2015

Feb 9 @ 2:09 PM ET
So nowhere that counts. .500 is based off the maximum points we could have. 94pts is the max we could have, therefor that is the threshold. This 100pts you mentioned doesn't exist.
- Retinalz

Points% given away .520
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Canuckville, BC
Joined: 01.09.2015

Feb 9 @ 2:09 PM ET
https://pittsburghhockeyn...ack-edwards-fan-reaction/

Only in America
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Canuckville, BC
Joined: 01.09.2015

Feb 9 @ 2:12 PM ET
Must have. 3 pt games doesn't mean a team gets 3 pts... the formula still remains gp x 2 = max points. Then total points x max points = points percentage.

47x2=94
48÷94= .511(rounded up from .5106382979 if you want to be exact)

- Retinalz

Canucks .511pts%
Rest of the league gets .520pts%
Retinalz
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Vancouver, BC
Joined: 01.31.2015

Feb 9 @ 2:18 PM ET
Canucks .511pts%
Rest of the league gets .520pts%

- Nighthawk

We are still a team above 500 though. The league doesn't calculate what the rest of the league gets.
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Canuckville, BC
Joined: 01.09.2015

Feb 9 @ 2:18 PM ET
I think Lordy has been teaching him math
- NewYorkNuck

They either remove pts win% or add ops pts%.
onesmallleap
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Be Calm n Swede On, BC
Joined: 09.23.2015

Feb 9 @ 2:23 PM ET
Must have. 3 pt games doesn't mean a team gets 3 pts... the formula still remains gp x 2 = max points. Then total points x max points = points percentage.

47x2=94
48÷94= .511(rounded up from .5106382979 if you want to be exact)

- Retinalz

Thanks teach😏
LeftCoaster
Location: Valley Of The Sun
Joined: 07.03.2009

Feb 9 @ 2:25 PM ET
Good for them not so good for Canucks
- VANTEL

Runner-up rookie of the year, Rookie of the year & Runner-up rookie of the year…pretty good for the Canucks.

Those near last place finishes weren’t for nothin
VANTEL
Joined: 07.03.2010

Feb 9 @ 2:33 PM ET
Runner-up rookie of the year, Rookie of the year & Runner-up rookie of the year…pretty good for the Canucks.

Those near last place finishes weren’t for nothin

- LeftCoaster


Not everyone is a fan of his play this year and last. You either like his style or you don't .

I think he has been pretty ineffective the last two seasons but I am still keeping him on the team and hoping he plays better.
A_SteamingLombardi
Location: Systemic failure / Slurptastic
Joined: 10.12.2008

Feb 9 @ 2:33 PM ET
Runner-up rookie of the year, Rookie of the year & Runner-up rookie of the year…pretty good for the Canucks.

Those near last place finishes weren’t for nothin

- LeftCoaster

Yeah we really should thank Green

Marwood
Location: Cumberland, BC
Joined: 03.18.2010

Feb 9 @ 2:36 PM ET
Runner-up rookie of the year, Rookie of the year & Runner-up rookie of the year…pretty good for the Canucks.

Those near last place finishes weren’t for nothin

- LeftCoaster

Benning was a good hockey man.
Reubenkincade
Location: BC
Joined: 11.18.2016

Feb 9 @ 2:41 PM ET
Runner-up rookie of the year, Rookie of the year & Runner-up rookie of the year…pretty good for the Canucks.

Those near last place finishes weren’t for nothin

- LeftCoaster


Nice to see them climbing up the division, all the way to 7th in division...oh wait,
dbot
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Auckland -Burn it all down
Joined: 10.22.2008

Feb 9 @ 3:11 PM ET
Yeah we really should thank Green


- A_SteamingLombardi


Canadiens fired HC Dominique Ducharme today.
Green is waiting by the phone.


Marwood
Location: Cumberland, BC
Joined: 03.18.2010

Feb 9 @ 3:12 PM ET
Canadiens fired HC Dominique Ducharme today.
Green is waiting by the phone.

- dbot

You must really hate the Habs.
CanuckDon
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Las Vegas
Joined: 08.05.2014

Feb 9 @ 3:13 PM ET
Runner-up rookie of the year, Rookie of the year & Runner-up rookie of the year…pretty good for the Canucks.

Those near last place finishes weren’t for nothin

- LeftCoaster

How many Calder cup runner ups does a team need to build a contender ?
dbot
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Auckland -Burn it all down
Joined: 10.22.2008

Feb 9 @ 3:14 PM ET
You must really hate the Habs.
- Marwood


They're actually my 2nd fave team, but a very distant 2nd.
At this point, I'm just glad other teams are struggling worse than the Nucks.
What a shambles that franchise is in atm.

Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Canuckville, BC
Joined: 01.09.2015

Feb 9 @ 3:18 PM ET
How many Calder cup runner ups does a team need to build a contender ?
- CanuckDon

Unretire TL lol
LeftCoaster
Location: Valley Of The Sun
Joined: 07.03.2009

Feb 9 @ 3:55 PM ET
How many Calder cup runner ups does a team need to build a contender ?
- CanuckDon

Three….at the WM Pro Am, smokin hot out right now. Blue Moon in hand ☀️👍🏼
K-man25
Calgary Flames
Location: K Town
Joined: 09.02.2014

Feb 9 @ 4:17 PM ET
Three….at the WM Pro Am, smokin hot out right now. Blue Moon in hand ☀️👍🏼
- LeftCoaster

So does Myers count?
Page: Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35  Next