Carol Schram: Canucks getting set for the Sharks, and the trade market for J.T. Miller Still in the playoff hunt, the Vancouver Canucks will get back to work on Thursday in San Jose, where they'll take on the Sharks. Quinn Hughes and Matthew Highmore should be back in the lineup, after Travis Hamonic returned last Saturday against Toronto.

Thanks Carol ! Agreed, let’s keep Miller if he wants to be here

Thanks Carol!

Thanks Carol!

Thanks Carol.

4 divisional opponents in the next 4 games. Trying to gain on 2 of them and stay ahead of the other 2.

Ducks and Kings are slowly coming back to earth from hot starts.

10 points behind Nashville for 7th spot and 4 points behind Dallas with them having 2 games in hand.

The East is set for who's in the playoffs already Really don't think Detroit or Columbus are going to tear it up and beat out Boston or Washington for wild cards.

Thank you Carol

Thanks Carol ! Agreed, let’s keep Miller if he wants to be here
- CanuckDon

Keep everyone, we're just a 3rd line centre away from a dynasty.

Keep everyone, we're just a 3rd line centre away from a dynasty.
- A_SteamingLombardi

Players like Pavelski are the exception
Not the norm. There are way too many instances of the Canucks hanging onto players and getting nothing in return. Most believe Miller is the best player that may be available this year. Add in the return just received for Toffoli, the Canucks would miss a huge opportunity to fill in multiple holes in their line up by re signing Miller.
The age of the player, current interest in the player, and likely ask for next contract makes trading Miller a must IMO

Player like Pavelski are the exception
Not the norm. There are way too many instances of the Canucks hanging onto players and getting nothing in return. Most believe Miller is the best player that may be available this year. Add in the return just received for Toffoli, the Canucks would be miss a huge opportunity to fill in multiple holes in their line up by re signing Miller.
The age of the player, current interest in the player, and likely ask for next contract makes trading Miller a must IMO
- 60thenew30

Username doesn’t add up with this post

Username doesn’t add up with this post
- Nucker101

Go figure
🤷‍♂️

Thx much Carol.

Sad to see Garland still buried on the 3L.

Good to have Hughes back and wow 4 players for Toffoli when the Flames could have had Evander Kane for next to nothing.

Hoping someday Marchand will get fed his own teeth by an opposing player but not likely here with the soft serve.

Keep Miller and Garland both...se what happens next year.

Thanks Carol!

I think little Joe has been a better player than Miller at every stage of his career, don’t really see the comparison there. I’d be open to signing Miller but this feels like his last big deal, and I bet that there is someone willing to offer him $50+m, which is probably 🍌 🍌 🍌

Keep everyone, we're just a 3rd line centre away from a dynasty.
- A_SteamingLombardi

Well they can’t trade the entire roster 🤷‍♂️

Would Kravtsov Lundqvist 2022 1st 2023 1st be enough for Miller?

I will always have the same stance with Miller. If we can keep him around or below(preferably) 7m and no more than 6 years, that is priority 1. Our top 6 is fine, we need to address other areas first. Shed salary via Pearson, Richardinson, Poolman, Hamonic, etc. Use those savings to upgrade and use our NHL ready ELC's.

Thanks Carol

Would Kravtsov Lundqvist 2022 1st 2023 1st be enough for Miller?
- nyrangers9479

I can't see the Canucks wanting Lundkvist. We already have 2 undersized offensive Dmen.

Thanks Carol!

I think little Joe has been a better player than Miller at every stage of his career, don’t really see the comparison there. I’d be open to signing Miller but this feels like his last big deal, and I bet that there is someone willing to offer him $50+m, which is probably 🍌 🍌 🍌
- 1970vintage

Incorrect, infact, Pavelski's career is the best example. He started playing his best hockey around 28/29 and this will be his first season at or above a PPG. Both are versatile and can play all 3 positions, pp and pk. Miller is worth the gamble, if the deal is team friendly.
I would move Boeser and put Garland with Miller and Bo.

Would Kravtsov Lundqvist 2022 1st 2023 1st be enough for Miller?
- nyrangers9479

No

Incorrect, infact, Pavelski's career is the best example. He started playing his best hockey around 28/29 and this will be his first season at or above a PPG. Both are versatile and can play all 3 positions, pp and pk. Miller is worth the gamble, if the deal is team friendly.
I would move Boeser and put Garland with Miller and Bo.
- Retinalz

I agree with this. Try and keep him around on a deal that pays him no more than 7.5M a year and around say 5 years.

I would much rather use the money on Miller than resigning Boeser. He should be the one traded or try and shed Myers as well.

Players like Pavelski are the exception
Not the norm. There are way too many instances of the Canucks hanging onto players and getting nothing in return. Most believe Miller is the best player that may be available this year. Add in the return just received for Toffoli, the Canucks would miss a huge opportunity to fill in multiple holes in their line up by re signing Miller.
The age of the player, current interest in the player, and likely ask for next contract makes trading Miller a must IMO
- 60thenew30

Yup.

Would Kravtsov Lundqvist 2022 1st 2023 1st be enough for Miller?
- nyrangers9479

I’d do it. The key is the 2023 1st

I can't see the Canucks wanting Lundkvist. We already have 2 undersized offensive Dmen.
- NorthNuck

He is an asset who can be flipped. Or a way better idea is to play the RHD and flip Rathbone

He is an asset who can be flipped. Or a way better idea is to play the RHD and flip Rathbone
- CanuckDon

I would prefer to get Schneider. More of a fit for what Van needs.