A roster example only using Vantels want for Zacha & mine for Klingberg. If Lindholm then Hughes swaps to RD with Hampus LHD. Boeser trade could be tweaked or a other team.
A roster example only using Vantels want for Zacha & mine for Klingberg. If Lindholm then Hughes swaps to RD with Hampus LHD. Boeser trade could be tweaked or a other team.
Remember the previous years of the train wreck that was Myers and Hughes. Klingberg and Hughes might make that pairing look responsible.
I'd rather have Poolman or Hamoninc. I'd also not want to handicap the teams cap for the next half decade with the poop contract Klingberg is going to get.
Remember the previous years of the train wreck that was Myers and Hughes. Klingberg and Hughes might make that pairing look responsible.
I'd rather have Poolman or Hamoninc. I'd also not want to handicap the teams cap for the next half decade with the poop contract Klingberg is going to get. - manvanfan
All good points. I like Klingberg for scoring oomph on the right side & a partner for Hughes. Really like Lindholm size & D. I’d risk they age well if under 7 years. Still though going slower on cap spending might be an option.
A roster example only using Vantels want for Zacha & mine for Klingberg. If Lindholm then Hughes swaps to RD with Hampus LHD. Boeser trade could be tweaked or a other team.
Don't say Vantels want . I said right at the beginning I think it will happen but doesn't mean I want it. You don't speak for me .
I think you are the dumbest person on this site so don't include me in your ridiculous daily rosters or trades. I have zero associations with you and any of your lunatic ramblings. They are all you pal.
Don't say Vantels want . I said right at the beginning I think it will happen but doesn't mean I want it. You don't speak for me .
I think you are the dumbest person on this site so don't include me in your ridiculous daily rosters or trades. I have zero associations with you and any of your lunatic ramblings. They are all you pal. - VANTEL
Chill. Still 2 days before the next game. Going to wear yourself out.
Hog for Comtois or R.Smith
Boeser for Zacha and Bahl
Hughes + Rathbone for Chychrun + Schmaltz + Crouse
Garland for Carlo
Pettersson for Provorov + Konecny
Horvat + prospect for Scheifele
Crouse - Scheifele - Miller
Comtois - Schmaltz - Konecny
Zacha - Pod
Provorov - Myers
Chychrun - Carlo
OEL - Hamonic/Schenn
Demko
Obviously not all will happen but that team would whoop this current team’s ass in a 7 game series
Hog for Comtois or R.Smith
Boeser for Zacha and Bahl
Hughes + Rathbone for Chychrun + Schmaltz + Crouse
Garland for Carlo
Pettersson for Provorov + Konecny
Horvat + prospect for Scheifele
Don't say Vantels want . I said right at the beginning I think it will happen but doesn't mean I want it. You don't speak for me .
I think you are the dumbest person on this site so don't include me in your ridiculous daily rosters or trades. I have zero associations with you and any of your lunatic ramblings. They are all you pal. - VANTEL
Just a working example since not much else to work with. Get off your high horse & get laid.
Hog for Comtois or R.Smith
Boeser for Zacha and Bahl
Hughes + Rathbone for Chychrun + Schmaltz + Crouse
Garland for Carlo
Pettersson for Provorov + Konecny
Horvat + prospect for Scheifele
Points percentage first half to second half (Tried to even it up but teams play different amounts of games. Dec 16 was cut out between halves.
Anaheim .629 - 444
Arizona .214 - 444 Boston .577 - 700
Buffalo .414 - 357 Calgary .643 - 712 Carolina .732 - 750
Chicago .429 - 414 Colorado .667 - 845
Columbus .518 - 536 Dallas .538 - 672
Detroit .517 - 442
Edmonton .607 - 536 Florida .690 - 750 LosAngeles .554 - 655
Minnesota .690 - 540
Montreal .274 - 400
Nashville .638 - 558
New Jersey .446 - 357
New York I .420 - 537
]New YorkR .707 - 667
Ottawa .352 - 429
Philadelphia .482 - 315 Pittsburgh .625 - 724
San Jose .517 - 462
Seattle .397 - 276
St. Louis .638 - 654 TampaBay .724 - 731
Toronto .700 - 640
Vancouver .484 - 615
Vegas .621 - 571
Washington .707 - 500
Winnipeg .554 - 482 - manvanfan
Teams trending up in the 2nd half probably, likely in for some playoff success. Only team I bolded that wasn’t, is the Rangers, that’s because they’re going to do something big at the deadline.