3-1 Dallas

This guy haunting Canucks now.

Chris Gear
@vangearman
·
1h
Canucks get a third for Hamonic, give a third for Dermott. I am not sure Dermott is actually a better player than Hamonic today, but he is younger, with more upside, and most importantly, hits the cap at half price next year. Solid reallocation of D dollars for Vancouver.
- manvanfan

Trolling

Jeez . What do you expect, we just got Dermott. All answers are solved .
- VANTEL

Any idea what number he's wearing here? If I leave now I can probably get my Dermott Canucks sweater all lettered up by game time. 😁👍

Any idea what number he's wearing here? If I leave now I can probably get my Dermott Canucks sweater all lettered up by game time. 😁👍
- Load Management

#32?

I expect full house cleaning.😁
I have said many times for a few seasons, that I don't like the make up of this team, so I don't care who goes.
So yes, change for change sakes works for me. Get rid of the high-priced help and bring in younger players.
- Reubenkincade

Dismantle the house that Benning built.

I expect full house cleaning.😁
I have said many times for a few seasons, that I don't like the make up of this team, so I don't care who goes.
So yes, change for change sakes works for me. Get rid of the high-priced help and bring in younger players.
- Reubenkincade

I would get a new set of bricks ready.

I thought the original trade of Hamonic for the third was a move in the right direction for the cap space. I don't give a rats ass about the third because I don't trust this new group yet. Thirds very seldom turn into regular NHL players .

The acquisition was unnecessary waste of cap space. Just more of the same old crap everyone b1tched about for years.

Any idea what number he's wearing here? If I leave now I can probably get my Dermott Canucks sweater all lettered up by game time. 😁👍
- Load Management

Look for 00

Not Rutherford.
- manvanfan

I seen Alvin once , he said Jim was getting a lot of calls .

Dismantle the house that Benning built.
- Marwood

Yes please. Every Last one of them that he brought here. Demko excluded...unless it is for a ransom.

I would get a new set of bricks ready.

I thought the original trade of Hamonic for the third was a move in the right direction for the cap space. I don't give a rats ass about the third because I don't trust this new group yet. Thirds very seldom turn into regular NHL players .

The acquisition was unnecessary waste of cap space. Just more of the same old crap everyone b1tched about for years.
- VANTEL

I have mentioned to you before, that I also have some doubts about this group of management, but also have bigger concerns with this group of players.

I have mentioned to you before, that I also have some doubts about this group of management, but also have bigger with this group of players.
- Reubenkincade

What doubts?

I have mentioned to you before, that I also have some doubts about this group of management, but also have bigger with this group of players.
- Reubenkincade

I understand your dislike . They are under preforming . I still think they have a lot of growing to do ( Petey and Hughes) and you may not see a positive for another two years. I look at Johnny Gaudreau and the problems he had and look at him today.

I think build around them for now and if in two years you still feel the same then move on then. I do get the frustration though .

What doubts?
- Nighthawk

Doubts about their ability and the type of team they will build.

This message is from a friend who doesn't have the ability to post here but I agree 100 % with this.


The Hamonic trade was good. Get rid of 3mil cap space on a 3rd paring who is injury prone and surrounded by controversy. What I don't understand was the need to acquire Dermott who was a 7/8 this season? They didn't need to do this. They gave up a 3rd and half their acquired cap savings for a player who needs to compete with Hunt and Poolman for that 6th spot at best. If more changes come like a RD trade or signing in the summer, he gets pushed even further down potentially... For all the talk on here about acquiring picks, I don't understand the propping up of this minor and pointless trade for Dermott. I think everyone would have been happy with Hamonic and the savings/pick positive without the following negative.

I understand your dislike . They are under preforming . I still think they have a lot of growing to do ( Petey and Hughes) and you may not see a positive for another two years. I look at Johnny Gaudreau and the problems he had and look at him today.

I think build around them for now and if in two years you still feel the same then move on then. I do get the frustration though .
- VANTEL

Not sure I like the idea of building a team around a couple of powerplay specialists

This message is from a friend who doesn't have the ability to post here but I agree 100 % with this.


The Hamonic trade was good. Get rid of 3mil cap space on a 3rd paring who is injury prone and surrounded by controversy. What I don't understand was the need to acquire Dermott who was a 7/8 this season? They didn't need to do this. They gave up a 3rd and half their acquired cap savings for a player who needs to compete with Hunt and Poolman for that 6th spot at best. If more changes come like a RD trade or signing in the summer, he gets pushed even further down potentially... For all the talk on here about acquiring picks, I don't understand the propping up of this minor and pointless trade for Dermott. I think everyone would have been happy with Hamonic and the savings/pick positive without the following negative.
- VANTEL

You realize that in just about every transactions that are linked to Vancouver, there will be some who like it and others who don't and some that are indifferent.

There's a game tonight people... focus.

Doubts about their ability and the type of team they will build.
- Reubenkincade

Ok but I’d call that an unknown. They aren’t rash so far.

20 hours remaining.

Go Canucks Go.

Not sure I like the idea of building a team around a couple of powerplay specialists
- Reubenkincade

I have my doubts also . I am hoping they are going to be complimentary players to some better decisions not bad ones like Dermott.

Patrik Allvin: greatest Canucks GM ever, or Greatest NHL GM ever?

This message is from a friend who doesn't have the ability to post here but I agree 100 % with this.


The Hamonic trade was good. Get rid of 3mil cap space on a 3rd paring who is injury prone and surrounded by controversy. What I don't understand was the need to acquire Dermott who was a 7/8 this season? They didn't need to do this. They gave up a 3rd and half their acquired cap savings for a player who needs to compete with Hunt and Poolman for that 6th spot at best. If more changes come like a RD trade or signing in the summer, he gets pushed even further down potentially... For all the talk on here about acquiring picks, I don't understand the propping up of this minor and pointless trade for Dermott. I think everyone would have been happy with Hamonic and the savings/pick positive without the following negative.
- VANTEL

You have friends.......



Must be nice

You realize that in just about every transactions that are linked to Vancouver, there will be some who like it and others who don't and some that are indifferent.
- Reubenkincade

You forgot lets see games played before going off. Lol

Ok but I’d call that an unknown. They aren’t rash so far.
- Nighthawk

Rutherford has been around the league for a couple seasons now, I haven't been a fan of his, but was happy he took on the job, or we would probably still be stuck with Benning.

Patrik Allvin: greatest Canucks GM ever, or Greatest NHL GM ever?
- 1970vintage

If they trade Boeser I’ll be very encouraged. Return doesn’t matter. It’s about identifying the overpaid passengers and eliminating them