1970vintage
Seattle Kraken |
|
|
Location: BC Joined: 11.11.2010
|
|
|
True but it was a BPA pick. I’ve said many times I don’t subscribe to BPA but I also don’t believe in reaching in the 1st round. - Nighthawk
So to be clear, you don’t believe in taking the best player available and you also don’t believe in not taking the best player available. |
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
Seriously does anyone in here not understand the cost of trading for a top 4 RHD is very expensive if even available?
That said who in here is willing to pay the ask & for who & for what? |
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
So to be clear, you don’t believe in taking the best player available and you also don’t believe in not taking the best player available. - 1970vintage
To be clear I don’t pick a reach in the 1st round. Was that not clear?
As for BPA I don’t subscribe to BPA until I hear MY TEAMS BPA list not the myriad of BPA lists out there. Therefore if say a RHD is in the same range or group of F’s then it’s pick RHD. BPA isn’t always cut n dried as only a single player is there to be picked. |
|
1970vintage
Seattle Kraken |
|
|
Location: BC Joined: 11.11.2010
|
|
|
To be clear I don’t pick a reach in the 1st round. Was that not clear?
As for BPA I don’t subscribe to BPA until I hear MY TEAMS BPA list not the myriad of BPA lists out there. Therefore if say a RHD is in the same range or group of F’s then it’s pick RHD. BPA isn’t always cut n dried as only a single player is there to be picked. - Nighthawk
obviously the best player available is the one that the team who is up at the podium making the announcement thinks is the best player available.
So not BPA and not not BPA unless that player isn’t “a reach” whatever that means. Got it. |
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
So NYR trade Lundkvist a 1st rd RHD who has proven nothing to date. Dallas pays a 1st & conditional 4th if I remember correctly.
Good deal or bad deal?
I’ll say Dallas can only hope it’s a good deal. Imo they were desperate & met NYR’s ask cuz Klingberg walked. Bad deal but willing to be proven wrong. He was 4th RHD depth in NYR. |
|
1970vintage
Seattle Kraken |
|
|
Location: BC Joined: 11.11.2010
|
|
|
So NYR trade Lundkvist a 1st rd RHD who has proven nothing to date. Dallas pays a 1st & conditional 4th if I remember correctly.
Good deal or bad deal?
I’ll say Dallas can only hope it’s a good deal. Imo they were desperate & met NYR’s ask cuz Klingberg walked. Bad deal but willing to be proven wrong. He was 4th RHD depth in NYR. - Nighthawk
Don would tell you it’s the worst deal in the history of hockey. The hockey pundits I’ve heard/read have said it’s a fair deal.
Seems like a lot to me given that Dallas isn’t exactly one guy away from challenging for the cup. |
|
golfingsince
|
|
|
Location: This message is Marwood approved! Joined: 11.30.2011
|
|
|
So NYR trade Lundkvist a 1st rd RHD who has proven nothing to date. Dallas pays a 1st & conditional 4th if I remember correctly.
Good deal or bad deal?
I’ll say Dallas can only hope it’s a good deal. Imo they were desperate & met NYR’s ask cuz Klingberg walked. Bad deal but willing to be proven wrong. He was 4th RHD depth in NYR. - Nighthawk
Dallas paid quite a bit for sure. However, it's only fair to point out that the Rags depth at RHD is amazing. It's quite possible any of them would be our best RHD. |
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
Dallas paid quite a bit for sure. However, it's only fair to point out that the Rags depth at RHD is amazing. It's quite possible any of them would be our best RHD. - golfingsince
True they had the depth but by no means has Lundkvist proven he’s top 4. He had the opportunity to be on the Rags but Schneider passed him. Will he do better in Dallas? He should given the opportunity but in the AHL he wasn’t turning heads.
What if Van paid the same price?
I’d be pissed & right along side with Don. |
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
Boring game. Not much to glean outta this one. |
|
boonerbuck
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Not Quesnel, BC Joined: 10.11.2005
|
|
|
Spent almost the whole 2nd period in the box. |
|
1970vintage
Seattle Kraken |
|
|
Location: BC Joined: 11.11.2010
|
|
|
No idea who this Kalynuk kid is, but he looks good. AHL contract, or camp invitee? |
|
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: MB Joined: 01.21.2012
|
|
|
No idea who this Kalynuk kid is, but he looks good. AHL contract, or camp invitee? - 1970vintage
Nhl contract. Came from Chicago org. Has some NHL experience about 30 games. |
|
1970vintage
Seattle Kraken |
|
|
Location: BC Joined: 11.11.2010
|
|
|
Nhl contract. Came from Chicago org. Has some NHL experience about 30 games. - manvanfan
Potential call up when injuries his. |
|
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: MB Joined: 01.21.2012
|
|
|
Potential call up when injuries his. - 1970vintage
Maybe. I'm not watching either game. Just checking score. See that both squads having some trouble scoring and being outshot at home the one team. |
|
Marwood
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Cumberland, BC Joined: 03.18.2010
|
|
|
Potential call up when injuries his. - 1970vintage
When injuries he is? |
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
No idea who this Kalynuk kid is, but he looks good. AHL contract, or camp invitee? - 1970vintage
He was in the young guns tourney & looked very solid. AHL contract.
Correction 1-way NHL deal |
|
Rang
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
Joined: 08.21.2006
|
|
|
Maybe. I'm not watching either game. Just checking score. See that both squads having some trouble scoring and being outshot at home the one team. - manvanfan
Pre-season hockey is unwatchable |
|
|
|
Dallas paid quite a bit for sure. However, it's only fair to point out that the Rags depth at RHD is amazing. It's quite possible any of them would be our best RHD. - golfingsince
His minor league stats are concerning. |
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
Pre-season hockey is unwatchable - Rang
Far too scrambly. No sustained quality viewing. |
|
Rang
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
Joined: 08.21.2006
|
|
|
Far too scrambly. No sustained quality viewing. - Nighthawk
Agreed
By the time they get to the last game of pre-season it's more the regulars and the intensity ramps up. |
|
golfingsince
|
|
|
Location: This message is Marwood approved! Joined: 11.30.2011
|
|
|
His minor league stats are concerning. - Shuswap Wap
I attribute much of that to not wanting to be there. Is it childish or unprofessional ? I think so but he's also just 22 years old and gets a fresh start where he's actually needed instead of being a surplus. |
|
boonerbuck
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Not Quesnel, BC Joined: 10.11.2005
|
|
|
Podz effortlessly walked that goal past the line. |
|
boonerbuck
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Not Quesnel, BC Joined: 10.11.2005
|
|
|
Mikheyev already injured. |
|
1970vintage
Seattle Kraken |
|
|
Location: BC Joined: 11.11.2010
|
|
|
Maybe. I'm not watching either game. Just checking score. See that both squads having some trouble scoring and being outshot at home the one team. - manvanfan
It’s a PP/PK fest. Rathbone has been pretty good, Dries, Kalynuk. The skill guys are having trouble, too choppy still.
Think the AHL Canucks will actually be pretty good this year. |
|
1970vintage
Seattle Kraken |
|
|
Location: BC Joined: 11.11.2010
|
|
|
When injuries he is? - Marwood
LOL |
|