And you believe him when he said this? tsk tsk tsk.
- Retinalz

Go read them yourself and form your own opinions. Humans are capable of critical thought and I support diverse opinions.

What i don't support is blindly following a narrative for the "greater good".

Didnt take me long to figure out youve been going to Bro Rogen-Pederson Youtube University for special boys and girls,

Here's a quick fact check on Peter McCullough based on citation of empirical evidence(not opinion or misinformation) https://healthfeedback.or...19-pandemic-and-vaccines/
- neem55

You didn't even know who he was.

I already said he'd been deplatformed and censored for his views.
What did you think that means?

You're attacking the person(me) and not the argument. That doctor is the most Cited and published cardiologist in history. You wanted to know the name of an expert, there's one. Go read the Twitter files to learn a little bit about how he was smeared by trash articles like you posted. His politics have nothing to do with his level of expertise.

The article adds words that he doesn't even say to impude him. He's talking about how the suppression of existing drugs was planned and the article inserts the word (pandemic) to imply that the doctor was saying that the pandemic was planned. Jesus that's the worse and least critically thought out retort of someone that I've read.
You're better then this.

Go read them yourself and form your own opinions. Humans are capable of critical thought and I support diverse opinions.

What i don't support is blindly following a narrative for the "greater good".
- Pres.cup

Quick questions, what are your thoughts on Trump and the GOP?

Quick questions, what are your thoughts on Trump and the GOP?
- Retinalz

Trump is an idiot, I hope he doesn't run again. His personality was worse then his policies.

Both political parties are (frank)ed.

I want to see Tusso Gabbard(sp), Ron Paul and Bernie Sanders being leaders but 2/3 are too old and Gabbard is a Muslim woman so none will ever get nominated.

You didn't even know who he was.

I already said he'd been deplatformed and censored for his views.
What did you think that means?

You're attacking the person(me) and not the argument. That doctor is the most Cited and published cardiologist in history. You wanted to know the name of an expert, there's one. Go read the Twitter files to learn a little bit about how he was smeared by trash articles like you posted. His politics have nothing to do with his level of expertise.

The article adds words that he doesn't even say to impude him. He's talking about how the suppression of existing drugs was planned and the article inserts the word (pandemic) to imply that the doctor was saying that the pandemic was planned. Jesus that's the worse and least critically thought out retort of someone that I've read.
You're better then this.


- Pres.cup

I just read up on him, ya he deserved what he got.

"December 2021, McCullough appeared on the Joe Rogan Experience promoting debunked conspiracy theories and misinformation (e.g. the COVID-19 pandemic was planned, the spike protein causes cell death, medical authorities are conspiring to illegitimately suppress hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin)"

This alone tells me that he drank the Trump/QAnon kool-aid.

Trump is an idiot, I hope he doesn't run again. His personality was worse then his policies.

Both political parties are (frank)ed.

I want to see Tusso Gabbard(sp), Ron Paul and Bernie Sanders being leaders but 2/3 are too old and Gabbard is a Muslim woman so none will ever get nominated.
- Pres.cup

I'm huge fan of Tulsi Gabbard. She is not Muslim though. You are probably thinking of Ilhan Omar.

One person ruining 3 threads at once. How civil.

I'm huge fan of Tulsi Gabbard. She is not Muslim though. You are probably thinking of Ilhan Omar.
- boonerbuck

Probably, I'm in court the last month and haven't been tracking. Tulsi is awesome.

Love watching all these people pulling onto Peter McCullough without being aware of his existence before now.

Pierre Luc Dubois rose up the rankings, everything a new ranking came out.

I would take Reinbacher at 4th. Pelikan if he is in the 2nd round, I think they consider it.

Abbotsford Canucks
@abbycanucks
·
54s
The #AbbyCanucks have signed goaltender Rylan Parenteau to a Professional Try Out Agreement (PTO)

................................................................................

Usually this doesn't mean nothing but with all the Demko talk is this the first Domino?

One person ruining 3 threads at once. How civil.
- NewYorkNuck

Did the one person post any personal attacks?

Interesting how upset some get when their narrative is challenged.

Who's talking about QANON? Not the people critical of the government.

Abbotsford Canucks
@abbycanucks
·
54s
The #AbbyCanucks have signed goaltender Rylan Parenteau to a Professional Try Out Agreement (PTO)

................................................................................

Usually this doesn't mean nothing but with all the Demko talk is this the first Domino?
- VANTEL

I love Demko but if the timeline doesn't fit his contract, move him.

I love Demko but if the timeline doesn't fit his contract, move him.
- Pres.cup

Do Canucks have a timeline?

- Pres.cup

Do Canucks have a timeline?



- VANTEL

And you believe him when he said this? tsk tsk tsk.
- Retinalz

I believe there were a lot of terrible and damning things exposed about a lot of powerful people. These people were exposed by name. If the allegations aren't true, with evidence to back them up, where are all of the defamation lawsuits?

Did the one person post any personal attacks?

Interesting how upset some get when their narrative is challenged.

Who's talking about QANON? Not the people critical of the government.
- Pres.cup

It's not your view points people don't want to engage you on, it's your pompous and hypocritical attitude.

The other forum is infested with neo leftists.
- VanHockeyGuy

So is this one

Do Canucks have a timeline?



- VANTEL

So is this one
- TurdFergeson

Edited

Says the pot who refuses to engage in discourse that's civil without name calling and having a tantrum.

Says the pot to the kettle
- Pres.cup

So you guys are both neo leftists?

i love these terms that are so ambiguous.

It's pretty much the same as how people used to throw around 'millennials' or 'hipsters' or whatever.

It seems like they're intended to be derogatory and no on self identifies as them, but everyone who's different than you is labelled one.

It's not your view points people don't want to engage you on, it's your pompous and hypocritical attitude.
- NewYorkNuck

Pompous... oh, you mean my refusal to accept a political narrative as a fact?

Hypocritical? I'm not sure about that, I'm admittedly a pain in the ass to debate against because I tend to hammer away at a specific point until the point is made.

Like when I was called a liar for posting that healthy 6 to 19yo children were never at statistical risk of dying from covid and provided a published study from the UK showing the risk of death to a healthy under 19yo was literally 1 in a million?
I was told that 75 kids under 19 died.

So I asked for a single example of a healthy 6 to 19 year old who died of covid in BC.

And was called alt right and a spreader of lies.

Multiple pages of me asking for that single example let to not one being given but instead an ardent refusal to accept that I was right.

I mean, it's always hard to wake up to the fact that you're wrong in a blatantly disrespectful manner. But that doesn't mean I was being a hypocrite, pompous yes, liar, no.

So you guys are both neo leftists?

i love these terms that are so ambiguous.

It's pretty much the same as how people used to throw around 'millennials' or 'hipsters' or whatever.

It seems like they're intended to be derogatory and no on self identifies as them, but everyone who's different than you is labelled one.


- dbot

No, the Turd was making an allegation and I was pointing out that his contribution to the political thread was strictly personal attacks and contributed nothing factual.

I was wrong and should have said "so says the pot " instead of including the full phrase. I'll go back and edit it.

Pompous... oh, you mean my refusal to accept a political narrative as a fact?

Hypocritical? I'm not sure about that, I'm admittedly a pain in the ass to debate against because I tend to hammer away at a specific point until the point is made.

Like when I was called a liar for posting that healthy 6 to 19yo children were never at statistical risk of dying from covid and provided a published study from the UK showing the risk of death to a healthy under 19yo was literally 1 in a million?
I was told that 75 kids under 19 died.

So I asked for a single example of a healthy 6 to 19 year old who died of covid in BC.

And was called alt right and a spreader of lies.

Multiple pages of me asking for that single example let to not one being given but instead an ardent refusal to accept that I was right.

I mean, it's always hard to wake up to the fact that you're wrong in a blatantly disrespectful manner. But that doesn't mean I was being a hypocrite, pompous yes, liar, no.
- Pres.cup

Perhaps misguided is the best descriptor?

I don't think the need to have healthy 6-19 year olds vaccinated was about them being at some acute risk of dying from COVID, but more about trying to reduce symptoms, reduce need for them to go to hospital, reduce strain on an already overworked health system and ultimately, reduce the spread to those most vulnerable.

Just my .02