Wanna blog? Start your own hockey blog with My HockeyBuzz. Register for free today!
 
Forums :: Blog World :: Hank Balling: Sabres At Ducks – Potential Trade Partners?
Author Message
ImThatGuy
Buffalo Sabres
Location: I AM MY OWN DAMN SOURCE!, NY
Joined: 11.04.2010

Feb 18 @ 1:11 PM ET
Have stayed shockingly healthy.

Guess we learned that they don't view Biro or Weissbach as prospects. Think we already knew Murray isn't. He had his shot.

Curious who they use recalls on this year. Do they care about making anyone currently up AHL playoff eligible? I wouldn't think so. Might mean some typical merit promotions, if the final games aren't meaningful. Kulich has certainly earned it.

- Lunaion


As we just saw with the Buffalo Bills, health is is no guarantee.

Make a trade to go for the playoffs.
Ratsreign
Florida Panthers
Location: Mo can stay awhile, FL
Joined: 10.27.2017

Feb 18 @ 1:11 PM ET
Okay I have to say this and I’m sorry

I understand the gesture but can we please stop posting entire Athletic articles on here

- BeadyEyedDouche

Will it irk you if I hit the reply button to the lengthy posted article just to say, “Yep” ?

Scroll
Scroll
Scroll.....
Hatboro_Swords
Buffalo Sabres
Location: WE'RE PRACTICING THE POWER PLAY!, PA
Joined: 07.30.2010

Feb 18 @ 1:28 PM ET
Big game tonight. Why is it a big game? Because it’s the next game. Gotta get the RW
homiedclown
Buffalo Sabres
Location: We want 1, FL
Joined: 02.24.2008

Feb 18 @ 1:29 PM ET
Will it irk you if I hit the reply button to the lengthy posted article just to say, “Yep” ?

Scroll
Scroll
Scroll.....

- Ratsreign

https://www.espn.com/nhl/...d-mindset-being-ok-losing
Buff36
Buffalo Sabres
Joined: 10.13.2019

Feb 18 @ 1:32 PM ET
Will it irk you if I hit the reply button to the lengthy posted article just to say, “Yep” ?

Scroll
Scroll
Scroll.....

- Ratsreign

Guess you can't please everyone
homiedclown
Buffalo Sabres
Location: We want 1, FL
Joined: 02.24.2008

Feb 18 @ 1:34 PM ET
Tiger spanking that driver
lacaprup
Buffalo Sabres
Location: NY
Joined: 07.23.2006

Feb 18 @ 1:39 PM ET
Legends of the Blueline

17 - 28 - 11, 45 points, 4th from the bottom in the NHL, and a 5 - 13 - 7 home record good for dead last in the NHL. The San Jose Sharks are not trying to be nor are they in the class of the Buffalo Sabres. Two points this evening is the only acceptable result. While the Sabre faithful come into the game a bit on edge with the team's performance since the bye week, San Jose fans must be checked out or simply running trade scenarios through their heads. In their last 4 games the Sharks have scored exactly 1-goal three times. In their last 10 games they've only scored 26 goals. That 2.6 goals per game average is significantly below the 3.0 goals per game the Sharks have averaged all year long.

Part of the problem for the Sharks is their HoF defenseman has slowed down (by his standard). In five of the last ten Sharks' games Karlsson has been blanked, though in the other 5 games he's managed 11 points. That may seem like I'm being a douche to him, but he's only been blanked 17 times all year and 5 of them came in the last 10 games. This fella does more for the Sharks offensively than Dahlin does for the Sabres. Maybe 3 people in the NHL that can be said about. For those comparing, Dahlin, who had bad week himself, has 10 points in his last 10 games and was blanked in four of them (he's been blanked 16 times this season). Karlsson a +2 in his last 10, Dahlin a +5.

Let's hope there's a big Richard competition at the opposing blue lines tonight. These guys each have end to end rushes for goals in them. I would love to see it.
Anderdog
Buffalo Sabres
Joined: 03.17.2021

Feb 18 @ 1:40 PM ET
After the game against Toronto this week, the Leafs coach said he couldn't take anything out of the game (Toronto won 5 - 2) and the Toronto media called it a "controlled scrimmage."

I guess the Hawks give effort one night and sleep through the next 4 games. Tough to evaluate.

- lacaprup



Watched a lot of that game
He looked disinterested
Skating was weak
BeadyEyedDouche
Buffalo Sabres
Location: Rustmine Ramsum most exciting Sabres klugdragger since Taro Tsujimoto
Joined: 07.01.2016

Feb 18 @ 1:40 PM ET
Will it irk you if I hit the reply button to the lengthy posted article just to say, “Yep” ?

Scroll
Scroll
Scroll.....

- Ratsreign

Dude please no
sabrebuzz
Joined: 12.28.2008

Feb 18 @ 1:40 PM ET
Faceoffs don't matter
- Buff36


They do.
Buff36
Buffalo Sabres
Joined: 10.13.2019

Feb 18 @ 1:42 PM ET
They do.
- sabrebuzz

That's not what I was told!!
homiedclown
Buffalo Sabres
Location: We want 1, FL
Joined: 02.24.2008

Feb 18 @ 1:46 PM ET
Dude please no
- BeadyEyedDouche

The Athletic
team
team
league
leagueMan United bid explained
league
Mock Draft
league
NHL Power Rankings
league
Daytona 500
Which NHL team can make the best current roster of players they traded away?

SEATTLE, WASHINGTON - NOVEMBER 23: Erik Karlsson #65 of the San Jose Sharks skates against the Seattle Kraken during the first period at Climate Pledge Arena on November 23, 2022 in Seattle, Washington. (Photo by Steph Chambers/Getty Images)
By Sean McIndoe
Feb 17, 2023
189

Save Article
We all love trades. Trades are the best. There’s no better feeling than finding out your favorite team has made a big deal.

Well, unless they trade away somebody good.

That’s the problem with the trading game — most teams have this weird thing where they want to get something back in return. In today’s NHL, that’s often just cap space, or some draft pick you’ll forget all about. But occasionally, teams still trade away actual NHL talent. And sometimes, that talent ends up looking pretty good in their new home.

ADVERTISEMENT


So today, let’s see which team can make the best starting lineup out of guys they’ve traded away. We’re talking current NHL talent — the three forwards, two defensemen and a goalie that your team traded and might wish they had back right now. We’re only counting the trades that put a player on his current team, so the Oilers can’t claim Taylor Hall, for example. We’re not counting draft picks that turned into players, and we’re not looking at free agents or waivers or anything else. Just those player trades, please.

It’s harder than you’d think to build full six-man lineups for most teams. Hard, but not impossible, and they don’t pay me to do the easy stuff. Let’s go through a few teams and see what we can come up with.

Buffalo Sabres
Let’s start with the obvious: Rebuilding teams are going to be our prime target here, because those are the teams that are trading established players away. And no team has been rebuilding longer than the Sabres. As soon as I had the concept for this post, I knew the Sabres would be my first stop.

And sure enough, there’s a ton of talent to work with. Too much, in fact, at least up front. We can start with Jack Eichel, who went to Vegas in last year’s blockbuster. We can also use Sam Reinhart. And for our third spot, we can have our pick of either Taylor Hall or Ryan O’Reilly, with Marcus Foligno available as depth. That’s about as good as we’re likely to get for a forward group.


Jack Eichel. (Stephen R. Sylvanie / USA Today)
The blue line isn’t quite as strong, but still has some options. The Sabres fleeced the Flyers into taking Rasmus Ristolainen a few summers ago, and we could pair him with Brandon Montour. Not exactly a Norris-worthy pairing, but not bad, and with five players down our Sabres lineup is in great shape.

That’s where it falls apart though, as I don’t think there are any active NHL goalies who were traded to the current team by the Sabres. We could argue over Jonas Johansson, who was traded from Buffalo to Colorado but recently had a brief waiver stop in Arizona, but he’s only played one game this year. The big miss is Linus Ullmark, a former Sabre who’ll probably win the Vezina but was a free agent, not a trade.

So somewhat surprisingly, the Sabres aren’t going to run away with this. Let’s check in on another rebuild to see if we can do better.

Chicago Blackhawks
The Hawks haven’t been at this as long as the Sabres have, but Kyle Davidson has made up for lost time over the last year or two. And unlike Buffalo, we have a clearcut goaltending option in Marc-Andre Fleury, dealt to the Wild last season.

Up front, we don’t even need to wait on Patrick Kane and Jonathan Toews, because we can lean on last year’s draft sell-off to start with Alex DeBrincat and Kirby Dach. And we can find a solid third option if we reach back to 2018 for the Nick Schmaltz trade. Sorry Brandon Hagel, we’ll keep you on speed dial.

The blue line is OK, with Adam Boqvist and Nikita Zadorov. That makes Chicago our first entry with a legitimate six-man group, and it’s a solid one that might get even better very soon. It doesn’t feel unbeatable, though, so let’s check in on one more rebuild.

Montreal Canadiens
Tragically, the Habs can’t make use of their best trade of the past few years, as Bitcoin Ben Chiarot has already moved on from his brief stint with the Panthers. We also lose out on Max Pacioretty, who would have worked before Vegas dealt him to Carolina. And Habs fans will be happy to know that this is one trade history post where we don’t have to bring up Ryan McDonagh. But don’t fear, because the Canadiens’ up-and-down last decade still gives us some options to work with.

Let’s start with Mikhail Sergachev, who went to the Lightning for Jonathan Drouin back in 2017. More recently, we can plug in Tyler Toffoli up front, and give him Artturi Lehkonen on the wing. And our second blueliner can give us a choice of something old (Jeff Petry) or something new (Alexander Romanov).

Unfortunately, I don’t see a great option for the third forward, and goaltending will be an issue. That may be a temporary problem, as Montreal should be selling at the deadline, so maybe we can pencil in a Jake Allen or Sean Monahan in a few weeks.

And since we did the Habs, let’s go to their oldest rivals …

Toronto Maple Leafs
The Leafs entry is … not good?

Sorry if I sound confused, but I just sort of assumed the Leafs would be strong here, based on a long history of bad trades. But most of those are too old to help us here, and at least a few of the worst Kyle Dubas moves involved shipping out draft picks. We can’t use Nazem Kadri to Colorado, since he’s now with the Flames, or Mason Marchment, who went from Florida to Dallas. Even Carter Verhaeghe doesn’t work, because the Leafs sent him to the Islanders before they traded him to Tampa.

So what are we left with? I can’t find much more than Kasperi Kapenen, Trevor Moore and Matt Martin up front, and maybe Sean Durzi and Nikita Zaitsev on the back end. I could get cute in goal by claiming Robin Lehner, who was technically Leafs property for a few minutes on the way from Chicago to Vegas, but otherwise it’s Petr Mrazek. The Leafs entry is bad. Which I guess is good. Or bad. I’m confused, let’s just move on.

Anaheim Ducks
Pat Verbeek was busy moving veterans at last year’s deadline, and that forms the basis of a solid start. We can build around Hampus Lindholm and Josh Manson on the blue line, plus Rickard Rakell up front, since all three stuck with their new teams. But that’s about all we’ve got to work with, as the last years of the Bob Murray era didn’t give us much in the way of significant player trades. I’m not even sure the incoming John Klingberg trade helps us — after the year he’s had, does he even take Manson’s spot?

Columbus Blue Jackets
The Blue Jackets are another team that gets off to a great start. We can build the blue line around Seth Jones, dealt to Chicago in 2021 in a deal that worked out well for Columbus. There’s plenty to choose from up front, starting with Pierre-Luc Dubois and Oliver Bjorkstrand. We could use our third spot on Cam Atkinson, although he’s missed this entire season. Another option would be Nashville’s Ryan Johansen from the original Jones trade, all the way back in 2016. Josh Anderson is there too.

Unfortunately, that’s about where the magic runs out for Columbus, who don’t have great options in goal or for the second blue-line spot (at least until they find a taker for Vladislav Gavrikov). If we weren’t limiting this to trades, they could call up their 2019 UFA departures like Artemi Panarin, Matt Duchene or Sergei Bobrovsky, but alas.

New York Rangers
There was a time when the Rangers were in on every big trade. That time was called “before we had a salary cap,” and you kids out there will have to take my word on it that it was fun. These days, the Rangers aren’t quite as active, but they still offer up some options. Up front, we can start with a pair of Blues in Pavel Buchnevich and the just-traded Sammy Blais, and let’s add in Ryan Reaves just for the entertainment value. (We could also go with Brett Howden or Morgan Barron.)

The blue line could start with Brady Skjei, and the second spot is probably Neal Pionk, with Nils Lundkvist ready to take over a spot soon. And they even have a solid option in goal, where Alexandar Georgiev is just entering his prime and having a good year in Colorado. All in all, the Rangers are far from an all-star squad, but it’s not bad.

Minnesota Wild
We sadly can’t use buyouts to pad the roster, but Bill Guerin still has a sneaky good team. We can start with Kevin Fiala up front, thanks to last summer’s trade to the Kings. Going back a few years before that, we can round out our forwards with Jason Zucker and Charlie Coyle.

The back end is a little dicey; the best I can do is Dmitry Kulikov, and I’m not even sure there is a second option. But we’ve got two goalies in Cam Talbot and Kaapo Kahkonen, so maybe we can move one for some blue-line help.


Kevin Fiala. (Gary A. Vasquez / USA Today)
Ottawa Senators
In theory, the Sens should be just about the ideal candidate for this sort of drill. They’ve been rebuilding for a few years, but were a contender recently enough that they had some good players to trade away. And sure enough, we can start with this year’s potential Norris winner, as Erik Karlsson slots into our blue line. We also get a strong start up front, where Mark Stone can be our top forward. And we have one more big name available, thanks to the ill-fated Mika Zibanejad trade from back in 2016.

The star power fades a bit after that, although we can still plug in some solid names. Let’s go with Nick Paul as the third forward, and Dylan DeMelo as our second defenseman. (If you prefer, we could also use guys like Jean-Gabriel Pageau, Jakob Silfverberg and Mike Reilly.) And unlike most of our teams, the Senators even have multiple options in goal, where Matt Murray could back up Filip Gustavsson.

Vegas Golden Knights
We mostly think of the Golden Knights landing big names, but they haven’t been shy about trading them away. We can use Max Pacioretty twice here, once from his own trade to the Hurricanes and once when the Knights acquired him, giving up a package that included Nick Suzuki. Let’s round out a really nice forward line with Alex Tuch.

Unfortunately, the rest of the roster doesn’t live up to the forwards. Our blue line loses Nate Schmidt and Colin Miller, who’ve both switched teams since the Knights traded them, so we probably end up with Nick Holden and maybe Erik Brannstrom. And I’m not sure there’s a goalie option.

Carolina Hurricanes
The Canes are another team that’s better known for acquiring these days, but they’ve given up a few decent names over the years. Let’s start with the biggest, even though it comes with an asterisk: Adam Fox, whose rights were traded to the Rangers because he wasn’t going to sign out of college. Bad for them, but good for our roster.

We can turn to a different Fox trade to fill a few other spots, landing Elias Lindholm and Noah Hanifin from the 2018 deal that sent them to Calgary for Fox’s rights and Dougie Hamilton. There’s also Justin Faulk, if you’d prefer him to Hanifin. Or Ethan Bear. Or Tony D’Angelo. These guys traded a lot of defensemen.

They also trade goalies, although that’s usually after they’ve figured out they’re not good anymore, so we’re probably stuck with Alex Nedeljkovic here. That leaves us with two forward spots to fill, and we can safely use one on Jeff Skinner now that he’s back to scoring goals. The third forward can be Nicolas Roy, or maybe Warren Foegele. All in all, not a bad squad thanks to the Fox/Lindholm starting duo; you could argue that Fox represents the best player in this entire exercise.

St. Louis Blues
We’ll end with the Blues, an interesting team that in recent years has experienced both a championship and, now, the start of a rebuild. Doug Armstrong is an aggressive trader, so this could be a good squad.

And it is, starting up front. The recent trade of Vladimir Tarasenko gives us a legitimate star, but there’s an even bigger one out there thanks to Tage Thompson. And we can round out the line with T.J. Oshie, traded to Washington almost eight years ago. That’s a solid forward group, and if we wait another week or two we can probably add Ryan O’Reilly to it.

The blue line won’t be quite as strong — curse you for not trading Alex Pietrangelo’s rights — but it’s workable. The Tarasenko trade also included Niko Mikkola, a serviceable player with a bit of upside. And we can go way back into the archives to find his partner. Erik Johnson is coming up on the 12th anniversary of the trade that sent him to Colorado, and he’s still there, meaning he qualifies for our team. (I believe that makes Johnson the longest-serving player on any NHL team who was acquired by trade, but feel free to fact-check me.)

We’ll round out the Blues with Ville Husso in goal, backed up by Jake Allen. With Oskar Sundqvist and Robby Fabbri as depth, that makes St. Louis one of our stronger entries.

So, who you got?

My final four comes out as the Blues, Senators, Hurricanes and Blackhawks, with the Sabres ready to push their way in as soon as they find a goalie. I think the Blues take it, but it’s close, and I could be swayed if you want to weigh in. Or even better, take a crack at a team I haven’t covered. Maybe you can do something with the Flames or Panthers around the various names in the Matthew Tkachuk trade, or the Sharks with Brent Burns and Josh Norris, or the Jets with Patrik Laine and Jacob Trouba. Meet us in the comments section — it’s Friday, it’s not like you were going to get any work done.

(Top photo of Erik Karlsson: Steph Chambers / Getty Images)
Good Stuff!! Hey we are #1 for something
Buff36
Buffalo Sabres
Joined: 10.13.2019

Feb 18 @ 1:48 PM ET
The Athletic
team
team
league
leagueMan United bid explained
league
Mock Draft
league
NHL Power Rankings
league
Daytona 500
Which NHL team can make the best current roster of players they traded away?

SEATTLE, WASHINGTON - NOVEMBER 23: Erik Karlsson #65 of the San Jose Sharks skates against the Seattle Kraken during the first period at Climate Pledge Arena on November 23, 2022 in Seattle, Washington. (Photo by Steph Chambers/Getty Images)
By Sean McIndoe
Feb 17, 2023
189

Save Article
We all love trades. Trades are the best. There’s no better feeling than finding out your favorite team has made a big deal.

Well, unless they trade away somebody good.

That’s the problem with the trading game — most teams have this weird thing where they want to get something back in return. In today’s NHL, that’s often just cap space, or some draft pick you’ll forget all about. But occasionally, teams still trade away actual NHL talent. And sometimes, that talent ends up looking pretty good in their new home.

ADVERTISEMENT


So today, let’s see which team can make the best starting lineup out of guys they’ve traded away. We’re talking current NHL talent — the three forwards, two defensemen and a goalie that your team traded and might wish they had back right now. We’re only counting the trades that put a player on his current team, so the Oilers can’t claim Taylor Hall, for example. We’re not counting draft picks that turned into players, and we’re not looking at free agents or waivers or anything else. Just those player trades, please.

It’s harder than you’d think to build full six-man lineups for most teams. Hard, but not impossible, and they don’t pay me to do the easy stuff. Let’s go through a few teams and see what we can come up with.

Buffalo Sabres
Let’s start with the obvious: Rebuilding teams are going to be our prime target here, because those are the teams that are trading established players away. And no team has been rebuilding longer than the Sabres. As soon as I had the concept for this post, I knew the Sabres would be my first stop.

And sure enough, there’s a ton of talent to work with. Too much, in fact, at least up front. We can start with Jack Eichel, who went to Vegas in last year’s blockbuster. We can also use Sam Reinhart. And for our third spot, we can have our pick of either Taylor Hall or Ryan O’Reilly, with Marcus Foligno available as depth. That’s about as good as we’re likely to get for a forward group.


Jack Eichel. (Stephen R. Sylvanie / USA Today)
The blue line isn’t quite as strong, but still has some options. The Sabres fleeced the Flyers into taking Rasmus Ristolainen a few summers ago, and we could pair him with Brandon Montour. Not exactly a Norris-worthy pairing, but not bad, and with five players down our Sabres lineup is in great shape.

That’s where it falls apart though, as I don’t think there are any active NHL goalies who were traded to the current team by the Sabres. We could argue over Jonas Johansson, who was traded from Buffalo to Colorado but recently had a brief waiver stop in Arizona, but he’s only played one game this year. The big miss is Linus Ullmark, a former Sabre who’ll probably win the Vezina but was a free agent, not a trade.

So somewhat surprisingly, the Sabres aren’t going to run away with this. Let’s check in on another rebuild to see if we can do better.

Chicago Blackhawks
The Hawks haven’t been at this as long as the Sabres have, but Kyle Davidson has made up for lost time over the last year or two. And unlike Buffalo, we have a clearcut goaltending option in Marc-Andre Fleury, dealt to the Wild last season.

Up front, we don’t even need to wait on Patrick Kane and Jonathan Toews, because we can lean on last year’s draft sell-off to start with Alex DeBrincat and Kirby Dach. And we can find a solid third option if we reach back to 2018 for the Nick Schmaltz trade. Sorry Brandon Hagel, we’ll keep you on speed dial.

The blue line is OK, with Adam Boqvist and Nikita Zadorov. That makes Chicago our first entry with a legitimate six-man group, and it’s a solid one that might get even better very soon. It doesn’t feel unbeatable, though, so let’s check in on one more rebuild.

Montreal Canadiens
Tragically, the Habs can’t make use of their best trade of the past few years, as Bitcoin Ben Chiarot has already moved on from his brief stint with the Panthers. We also lose out on Max Pacioretty, who would have worked before Vegas dealt him to Carolina. And Habs fans will be happy to know that this is one trade history post where we don’t have to bring up Ryan McDonagh. But don’t fear, because the Canadiens’ up-and-down last decade still gives us some options to work with.

Let’s start with Mikhail Sergachev, who went to the Lightning for Jonathan Drouin back in 2017. More recently, we can plug in Tyler Toffoli up front, and give him Artturi Lehkonen on the wing. And our second blueliner can give us a choice of something old (Jeff Petry) or something new (Alexander Romanov).

Unfortunately, I don’t see a great option for the third forward, and goaltending will be an issue. That may be a temporary problem, as Montreal should be selling at the deadline, so maybe we can pencil in a Jake Allen or Sean Monahan in a few weeks.

And since we did the Habs, let’s go to their oldest rivals …

Toronto Maple Leafs
The Leafs entry is … not good?

Sorry if I sound confused, but I just sort of assumed the Leafs would be strong here, based on a long history of bad trades. But most of those are too old to help us here, and at least a few of the worst Kyle Dubas moves involved shipping out draft picks. We can’t use Nazem Kadri to Colorado, since he’s now with the Flames, or Mason Marchment, who went from Florida to Dallas. Even Carter Verhaeghe doesn’t work, because the Leafs sent him to the Islanders before they traded him to Tampa.

So what are we left with? I can’t find much more than Kasperi Kapenen, Trevor Moore and Matt Martin up front, and maybe Sean Durzi and Nikita Zaitsev on the back end. I could get cute in goal by claiming Robin Lehner, who was technically Leafs property for a few minutes on the way from Chicago to Vegas, but otherwise it’s Petr Mrazek. The Leafs entry is bad. Which I guess is good. Or bad. I’m confused, let’s just move on.

Anaheim Ducks
Pat Verbeek was busy moving veterans at last year’s deadline, and that forms the basis of a solid start. We can build around Hampus Lindholm and Josh Manson on the blue line, plus Rickard Rakell up front, since all three stuck with their new teams. But that’s about all we’ve got to work with, as the last years of the Bob Murray era didn’t give us much in the way of significant player trades. I’m not even sure the incoming John Klingberg trade helps us — after the year he’s had, does he even take Manson’s spot?

Columbus Blue Jackets
The Blue Jackets are another team that gets off to a great start. We can build the blue line around Seth Jones, dealt to Chicago in 2021 in a deal that worked out well for Columbus. There’s plenty to choose from up front, starting with Pierre-Luc Dubois and Oliver Bjorkstrand. We could use our third spot on Cam Atkinson, although he’s missed this entire season. Another option would be Nashville’s Ryan Johansen from the original Jones trade, all the way back in 2016. Josh Anderson is there too.

Unfortunately, that’s about where the magic runs out for Columbus, who don’t have great options in goal or for the second blue-line spot (at least until they find a taker for Vladislav Gavrikov). If we weren’t limiting this to trades, they could call up their 2019 UFA departures like Artemi Panarin, Matt Duchene or Sergei Bobrovsky, but alas.

New York Rangers
There was a time when the Rangers were in on every big trade. That time was called “before we had a salary cap,” and you kids out there will have to take my word on it that it was fun. These days, the Rangers aren’t quite as active, but they still offer up some options. Up front, we can start with a pair of Blues in Pavel Buchnevich and the just-traded Sammy Blais, and let’s add in Ryan Reaves just for the entertainment value. (We could also go with Brett Howden or Morgan Barron.)

The blue line could start with Brady Skjei, and the second spot is probably Neal Pionk, with Nils Lundkvist ready to take over a spot soon. And they even have a solid option in goal, where Alexandar Georgiev is just entering his prime and having a good year in Colorado. All in all, the Rangers are far from an all-star squad, but it’s not bad.

Minnesota Wild
We sadly can’t use buyouts to pad the roster, but Bill Guerin still has a sneaky good team. We can start with Kevin Fiala up front, thanks to last summer’s trade to the Kings. Going back a few years before that, we can round out our forwards with Jason Zucker and Charlie Coyle.

The back end is a little dicey; the best I can do is Dmitry Kulikov, and I’m not even sure there is a second option. But we’ve got two goalies in Cam Talbot and Kaapo Kahkonen, so maybe we can move one for some blue-line help.


Kevin Fiala. (Gary A. Vasquez / USA Today)
Ottawa Senators
In theory, the Sens should be just about the ideal candidate for this sort of drill. They’ve been rebuilding for a few years, but were a contender recently enough that they had some good players to trade away. And sure enough, we can start with this year’s potential Norris winner, as Erik Karlsson slots into our blue line. We also get a strong start up front, where Mark Stone can be our top forward. And we have one more big name available, thanks to the ill-fated Mika Zibanejad trade from back in 2016.

The star power fades a bit after that, although we can still plug in some solid names. Let’s go with Nick Paul as the third forward, and Dylan DeMelo as our second defenseman. (If you prefer, we could also use guys like Jean-Gabriel Pageau, Jakob Silfverberg and Mike Reilly.) And unlike most of our teams, the Senators even have multiple options in goal, where Matt Murray could back up Filip Gustavsson.

Vegas Golden Knights
We mostly think of the Golden Knights landing big names, but they haven’t been shy about trading them away. We can use Max Pacioretty twice here, once from his own trade to the Hurricanes and once when the Knights acquired him, giving up a package that included Nick Suzuki. Let’s round out a really nice forward line with Alex Tuch.

Unfortunately, the rest of the roster doesn’t live up to the forwards. Our blue line loses Nate Schmidt and Colin Miller, who’ve both switched teams since the Knights traded them, so we probably end up with Nick Holden and maybe Erik Brannstrom. And I’m not sure there’s a goalie option.

Carolina Hurricanes
The Canes are another team that’s better known for acquiring these days, but they’ve given up a few decent names over the years. Let’s start with the biggest, even though it comes with an asterisk: Adam Fox, whose rights were traded to the Rangers because he wasn’t going to sign out of college. Bad for them, but good for our roster.

We can turn to a different Fox trade to fill a few other spots, landing Elias Lindholm and Noah Hanifin from the 2018 deal that sent them to Calgary for Fox’s rights and Dougie Hamilton. There’s also Justin Faulk, if you’d prefer him to Hanifin. Or Ethan Bear. Or Tony D’Angelo. These guys traded a lot of defensemen.

They also trade goalies, although that’s usually after they’ve figured out they’re not good anymore, so we’re probably stuck with Alex Nedeljkovic here. That leaves us with two forward spots to fill, and we can safely use one on Jeff Skinner now that he’s back to scoring goals. The third forward can be Nicolas Roy, or maybe Warren Foegele. All in all, not a bad squad thanks to the Fox/Lindholm starting duo; you could argue that Fox represents the best player in this entire exercise.

St. Louis Blues
We’ll end with the Blues, an interesting team that in recent years has experienced both a championship and, now, the start of a rebuild. Doug Armstrong is an aggressive trader, so this could be a good squad.

And it is, starting up front. The recent trade of Vladimir Tarasenko gives us a legitimate star, but there’s an even bigger one out there thanks to Tage Thompson. And we can round out the line with T.J. Oshie, traded to Washington almost eight years ago. That’s a solid forward group, and if we wait another week or two we can probably add Ryan O’Reilly to it.

The blue line won’t be quite as strong — curse you for not trading Alex Pietrangelo’s rights — but it’s workable. The Tarasenko trade also included Niko Mikkola, a serviceable player with a bit of upside. And we can go way back into the archives to find his partner. Erik Johnson is coming up on the 12th anniversary of the trade that sent him to Colorado, and he’s still there, meaning he qualifies for our team. (I believe that makes Johnson the longest-serving player on any NHL team who was acquired by trade, but feel free to fact-check me.)

We’ll round out the Blues with Ville Husso in goal, backed up by Jake Allen. With Oskar Sundqvist and Robby Fabbri as depth, that makes St. Louis one of our stronger entries.

So, who you got?

My final four comes out as the Blues, Senators, Hurricanes and Blackhawks, with the Sabres ready to push their way in as soon as they find a goalie. I think the Blues take it, but it’s close, and I could be swayed if you want to weigh in. Or even better, take a crack at a team I haven’t covered. Maybe you can do something with the Flames or Panthers around the various names in the Matthew Tkachuk trade, or the Sharks with Brent Burns and Josh Norris, or the Jets with Patrik Laine and Jacob Trouba. Meet us in the comments section — it’s Friday, it’s not like you were going to get any work done.

(Top photo of Erik Karlsson: Steph Chambers / Getty Images)
Good Stuff!! Hey we are #1 for something

- homiedclown

Bad clown!!
lacaprup
Buffalo Sabres
Location: NY
Joined: 07.23.2006

Feb 18 @ 1:55 PM ET
That's crappy, clown, I spent several minutes writing this. I'm bumping it.

Legends of the Blueline

17 - 28 - 11, 45 points, 4th from the bottom in the NHL, and a 5 - 13 - 7 home record good for dead last in the NHL. The San Jose Sharks are not trying to be nor are they in the class of the Buffalo Sabres. Two points this evening is the only acceptable result. While the Sabre faithful come into the game a bit on edge with the team's performance since the bye week, San Jose fans must be checked out or simply running trade scenarios through their heads. In their last 4 games the Sharks have scored exactly 1-goal three times. In their last 10 games they've only scored 26 goals. That 2.6 goals per game average is significantly below the 3.0 goals per game the Sharks have averaged all year long.

Part of the problem for the Sharks is their HoF defenseman has slowed down (by his standard). In five of the last ten Sharks' games Karlsson has been blanked, though in the other 5 games he's managed 11 points. That may seem like I'm being a douche to him, but he's only been blanked 17 times all year and 5 of them came in the last 10 games. This fella does more for the Sharks offensively than Dahlin does for the Sabres. Maybe 3 people in the NHL that can be said about. For those comparing, Dahlin, who had bad week himself, has 10 points in his last 10 games and was blanked in four of them (he's been blanked 16 times this season). Karlsson a +2 in his last 10, Dahlin a +5.

Let's hope there's a big Richard competition at the opposing blue lines tonight. These guys each have end to end rushes for goals in them. I would love to see it.
homiedclown
Buffalo Sabres
Location: We want 1, FL
Joined: 02.24.2008

Feb 18 @ 1:55 PM ET
Bad clown!!
- Buff36

How about just making your point without the extra comment. That’s just being antagonistic, looking for a response.

Man I hope CaptEO gets a new ref for this blog
- Makita



Actually, my comments weren’t “antagonistic”
They were in response to the bullsh!t that he started earlier- like he always does
- jdfitz77



You are a grown adult I assume, you do know how to socially interact with others.

This sounds like my 5 year old justifying why she fights with my 6 year old.
- Makita





https://www.hockeybuzz.co...post_id=21724587#21724587
sabrebuzz
Joined: 12.28.2008

Feb 18 @ 2:03 PM ET
Curious if it would take similar or more than the current ask for Meier? I'm guessing more.

The Sabres don't seem to want to trade for anybody that they would have to pay more than Tage or Cozens are getting.

I hope that is not true.

- kingcong39


I think I heard that somewhere before.
Anderdog
Buffalo Sabres
Joined: 03.17.2021

Feb 18 @ 2:04 PM ET
That's crappy, clown, I spent several minutes writing this. I'm bumping it.

Legends of the Blueline

17 - 28 - 11, 45 points, 4th from the bottom in the NHL, and a 5 - 13 - 7 home record good for dead last in the NHL. The San Jose Sharks are not trying to be nor are they in the class of the Buffalo Sabres. Two points this evening is the only acceptable result. While the Sabre faithful come into the game a bit on edge with the team's performance since the bye week, San Jose fans must be checked out or simply running trade scenarios through their heads. In their last 4 games the Sharks have scored exactly 1-goal three times. In their last 10 games they've only scored 26 goals. That 2.6 goals per game average is significantly below the 3.0 goals per game the Sharks have averaged all year long.

Part of the problem for the Sharks is their HoF defenseman has slowed down (by his standard). In five of the last ten Sharks' games Karlsson has been blanked, though in the other 5 games he's managed 11 points. That may seem like I'm being a douche to him, but he's only been blanked 17 times all year and 5 of them came in the last 10 games. This fella does more for the Sharks offensively than Dahlin does for the Sabres. Maybe 3 people in the NHL that can be said about. For those comparing, Dahlin, who had bad week himself, has 10 points in his last 10 games and was blanked in four of them (he's been blanked 16 times this season). Karlsson a +2 in his last 10, Dahlin a +5.

Let's hope there's a big Richard competition at the opposing blue lines tonight. These guys each have end to end rushes for goals in them. I would love to see it.

- lacaprup



Take me a week to type hat
lacaprup
Buffalo Sabres
Location: NY
Joined: 07.23.2006

Feb 18 @ 2:10 PM ET
Take me a week to type hat
- Anderdog


I moved to the PC. Wouldn't even attempt that on my phone.
Boss34
Buffalo Sabres
Location: BUFFALO , NY
Joined: 12.03.2015

Feb 18 @ 2:13 PM ET
Big game tonight. Why is it a big game? Because it’s the next game. Gotta get the RW
- Hatboro_Swords


Good scoop

PM incoming
lacaprup
Buffalo Sabres
Location: NY
Joined: 07.23.2006

Feb 18 @ 2:15 PM ET
One shot, one goal.
Preds 1
Cats 0
Hatboro_Swords
Buffalo Sabres
Location: WE'RE PRACTICING THE POWER PLAY!, PA
Joined: 07.30.2010

Feb 18 @ 2:15 PM ET
Good scoop

PM incoming

- Boss34

Sweet! You nailed it about a month ago. Maybe this is the next shoe to drop!?!?
Buff36
Buffalo Sabres
Joined: 10.13.2019

Feb 18 @ 2:16 PM ET
How about just making your point without the extra comment. That’s just being antagonistic, looking for a response.

Man I hope CaptEO gets a new ref for this blog
- Makita



Actually, my comments weren’t “antagonistic”
They were in response to the bullsh!t that he started earlier- like he always does
- jdfitz77



You are a grown adult I assume, you do know how to socially interact with others.

This sounds like my 5 year old justifying why she fights with my 6 year old.
- Makita





https://www.hockeybuzz.co...post_id=21724587#21724587

- homiedclown

If you miss him he’s over on CapFriendly, sure he would like to hear from some Buzzards.
lacaprup
Buffalo Sabres
Location: NY
Joined: 07.23.2006

Feb 18 @ 2:22 PM ET
Lankonin gives Counsins a freebie since he used to be a Pred.
1 - 1
lacaprup
Buffalo Sabres
Location: NY
Joined: 07.23.2006

Feb 18 @ 2:30 PM ET
Brandon Montour.

Cats are outplaying the Preds. We ain't gonne get help.
lacaprup
Buffalo Sabres
Location: NY
Joined: 07.23.2006

Feb 18 @ 2:33 PM ET
Nevermind. 2 - 2. Momentum swings all over.
Page: Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66  Next