I’ve been refreshing twitter non stop for like 48 hours trying to find out what Rangers gave up for him. So no, not yet.
- jimbro83

The difference those players were strategically acquired to fill needs on the 94 team. Adding VT and Kane feels like Sather all over again.
- SouthernRanger

Wasn’t the Rangers problem last year against Tampa that the offense dried up?

Wasn’t the Rangers problem last year against Tampa that the offense dried up?
- Rangers99

Yes it was. And guess what. It’s been a problem for last 4 games too

Exactly. That’s why the Rangers are going to play today with 11 forwards and 6 defensemen.
- jimbro83

Can we pull a tampa and put Lindgren on IR till the playoffs and still add another d man? Or not enough space for that

Wasn’t the Rangers problem last year against Tampa that the offense dried up?
- Rangers99

That’s been known to happen from time to time when ur 11.5 million dollar player turns into a ghost

Can we pull a tampa and put Lindgren on IR till the playoffs and still add another d man? Or not enough space for that
- TPC

I think it’s possible yes. Just crazy stuff goin on

The only part of the equation that could have ended the trade is Chicago. Am I right about that?
- Cptmjl

No Kane and Rangers could have ended it at any time also

Which sather trades do they remind you of though. Ultimately we are looking at the 30th overall pick and Hunter skinner for tarasenko
- jimbro83[/quote

I understand what the trade was but I feel like they aren’t analyzing what is needed from top to bottom but doing a 180 after getting VT because the shiny new toy in Kane might be available. I would rather have taken either player and fill other holes.

Wonder where we would be if Kane never expressed his disappointment

So Kane and Lafferty can't join Rangers till after 3/1?

So Kane and Lafferty can't join Rangers till after 3/1?
- rrentz

If the Rangers don’t put Lindgren on LTIR, they definitely can’t add Kane until 3/1 as it stands now.

No Kane and Rangers could have ended it at any time also
- hfc355

Kane is not signing anywhere for $3 mil per year.

Kane is not signing anywhere for $3 mil per year.
- -Doh-

Bergeron did to stay in Boston

Bergeron did to stay in Boston
- rrentz

For one season at the age of 37

Bergeron did to stay in Boston
- rrentz

Career Bruin, slightly different story here

Dreger saying that Vegas getting Barbashev doesn't mean they're out on Meier, so that's nice

Dreger saying that Vegas getting Barbashev doesn't mean they're out on Meier, so that's nice
- t-dawg

I don’t know what assets that franchise has left at this point but here’s hoping they get meier

[quote=picklerick]

Honestly.

I haven't caught any updates since late afternoon Thursday per the following listed expected buyers only, with their then available amount of LTIR cap space to additionally use to complete trades.
(No word of Ryan Lindgren put on LTIR as of 12:30 pm Sunday.)

*(Denotes teams as of late afternoon Thursday who had a player(s) they expect to activate before March 3rd's deadline time.)

Carolina - $10.1M in LTIR cap space
Vegas - $8.8M LTIR
Colorado - $8M LTIR
*Toronto - $4.5M LTIR
*Florida - $4.1M LTIR
New Jersey - $2.1M LTIR
*Pittsburgh - $1.2M LTIR
Boston - $1M LTIR
Tampa - $700K LTIR
Edmonton - $600K LTIR

Dreger saying that Vegas getting Barbashev doesn't mean they're out on Meier, so that's nice
- t-dawg

Zach Dean the return for Stl. Solid add for them and good move by Vegas to get Barbashev. No reports of salary being retained by the Blues.

Zach Dean the return for Stl. Solid add for them and good move by Vegas to get Barbashev. No reports of salary being retained by the Blues.
- airjan23

Vegas has no trade assets anymore. That was it

Zach Dean the return for Stl. Solid add for them and good move by Vegas to get Barbashev. No reports of salary being retained by the Blues.
- airjan23

Ya basically a 1st, but rather than trade this years 1st they gave up a former 1st round pick. On top of not wanting him, if we give up a 1st for Kane and go from having 2 1sts to none this year, I really won’t be happy about Drury’s asset management

Ya basically a 1st, but rather than trade this years 1st they gave up a former 1st round pick. On top of not wanting him, if we give up a 1st for Kane and go from having 2 1sts to none this year, I really won’t be happy about Drury’s asset management
- nyrangers9479

We are not trading a first

We are not trading a first
- picklerick

I predict it will be a 2nd round pick that upgrades to a protected 2024 first if Kane re-signs with Rangers

I predict it will be a 2nd round pick that upgrades to a protected 2024 first if Kane re-signs with Rangers
- jimbro83

If he produces and resigns I could deal with that price