So sloppy in the D zone.
- Stripes77

Stop, it's a strong point

I was told UPL sucks and Anderson was good.

2 goals on 12 shots.
- sabresfan69

Anderson is our best chance at winning.
I wouldn’t call any of them “good”.

Olofsson how about standing in front, do something

Jesus, maybe we should bring a lazy-boy down there for Columbus

Anderson is our best chance at winning.
I wouldn’t call any of them “good”.
- ImThatGuy

Unfortunately statistically speaking UPL is our best chance since he has the best winning percentage.

I was told UPL sucks and Anderson was good.

2 goals on 12 shots.
- sabresfan69

15 shots now, still 2 goals. It'll be well over 20 soon enough.

Great pass Joker. Right in Quinn’s skates

Joker sucks

Unfortunately statistically speaking UPL is our best chance since he has the best winning percentage.
- sabresfan69

Yeah, Craig needs to tell the guys to score 7 goals a game the nights he’s in net.

What an idiot

Unfortunately statistically speaking UPL is our best chance since he has the best winning percentage.
- sabresfan69

It would be 4 - 1 right now if UPL were in net.

Quinn pulled down and no penalty.

Refs are pure garbage.

It would be 4 - 1 right now if UPL were in net.
- lacaprup

For Buffalo? Buffalo loves scoring goals when UPL is in net.

Statistics don't lie. You seem to not understand them.

For Buffalo? Buffalo loves scoring goals when UPL is in net.

Statistics don't lie. You seem to not understand them.
- sabresfan69

He's just not good at goalie. If he weren't goonishly tall he wouldn't even had made the ahl. He has no skill.

Will someone go to the net

He's just not good at goalie. If he weren't goonishly tall he wouldn't even had made the ahl. He has no skill.
- lacaprup

Sure he isn't a good goalie but statistics don't lie. You seem to have trouble with that.

Buffalo has a better chance of winning with UPL in net statistically speaking.

Are you saying the stats are wrong?

Sure he isn't a good goalie but statistics don't lie. You seem to have trouble with that.

Buffalo has a better chance of winning with UPL in net statistically speaking.

Are you saying the stats are wrong?
- sabresfan69

What statistic other than win% are you talking about.

Sure he isn't a good goalie but statistics don't lie. You seem to have trouble with that.
- sabresfan69

No, they don't. They all say he sucks, and that his team outscores his dogshlt goaltending. He's a tall goon with no skill to stop a puck. That's why he's not good at stopping pucks, which is why he has a sub .900 %

Will someone go to the net
- Buff36

Seriously. No traffic in front at all

What statistic other than win% are you talking about.
- ImThatGuy

Are you saying that a goalie with a better win % doesn't give you a better chance at winning statistically speaking.

Did I fail math class or something? Is this bizarro world?

Sure he isn't a good goalie but statistics don't lie. You seem to have trouble with that.

Buffalo has a better chance of winning with UPL in net statistically speaking.

Are you saying the stats are wrong?
- sabresfan69

This happened the last time Anderson lost. We had a bunch of "it would be worse if UPL was here" rather than looking at the goalie that is actually in net.

Realistically all 3 goalies are mid, to pretend than any of them move the needle compared to each other is a waste. Until they overhaul the defense and stop collapsing the forwards it doesn't matter who they get.

Kane trade is official.

https://twitter.com/nhl/s...&t=t2g66eaQFGimAnt0RvfRgQ

This happened the last time Anderson lost. We had a bunch of "it would be worse if UPL was here" rather than looking at the goalie that is actually in net.

Realistically all 3 goalies are mid, to pretend than any of them move the needle compared to each other is a waste. Until they overhaul the defense and stop collapsing the forwards it doesn't matter who they get.
- Zschalberg

Goalie A is 15-8 with a winning percentage of 65%
Goalie B is 9-7 with a winning percentage of 56%

What goalie has higher odds of wining?

Math isn't hard here. You may not like it but statistically speaking goalie A has a better chance of wining.

This isn't BIZARRO world.

This happened the last time Anderson lost. We had a bunch of "it would be worse if UPL was here" rather than looking at the goalie that is actually in net.

Realistically all 3 goalies are mid, to pretend than any of them move the needle compared to each other is a waste. Until they overhaul the defense and stop collapsing the forwards it doesn't matter who they get.
- Zschalberg

Dahlin being out obviously doesn't help either. Not sure if there are any viable defensive free agents this summer but it's gotta be the priority

Joker sucks
- Buff36

Mitts, Joker, Bryson, UPL all heading into the final year of bridge deals. Would like a decision on a couple.

Dahlin and Stillman too, but much different situation.

Goalie A is 15-8 with a winning percentage of 65%
Goalie B is 9-7 with a winning percentage of 56%

What goalie has higher odds of wining?

Math isn't hard here. You may not like it but statistically speaking goalie A has a better chance of wining.

This isn't BIZARRO world.
- sabresfan69

Trick question, both goalies are losing in this game. The team is the issue