golfingsince
|
|
|
Location: This message is Marwood approved! Joined: 11.30.2011
|
|
|
More bottom 6 love from Ruby - manvanfan
Does our entire bottom 6 have 33 goals this season? |
|
boonerbuck
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Not Quesnel, BC Joined: 10.11.2005
|
|
|
A good top 9, not sure I would call them a good team.
Also, I don't think they have nearly as good of a top 9 as the Canucks. - Reubenkincade
Most seasons they are near or at the top of the league. I'd say they are a good team. If they had a star goalie, they would have gone far in the P/O's by now.
|
|
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: MB Joined: 01.21.2012
|
|
|
1-1 Providence and Northeastern.
Canucks fans might get a new shiny toy earlier than thought.
Would be excellent if his center came along with him.
https://www.eliteprospect.../296493/justin-hryckowian
Dorrington also has a cross checking penalty for an opponent coming within 5 feet of Levi. |
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
I guess that’s to be expected when you hire a Boston “journalist” to write for the Canucks.
Jesus, Carol spoiled us. - bloatedmosquito
She sure did 👍👍 |
|
|
|
More bottom 6 love from Ruby - manvanfan
That's right, you win with shiny top 6 players. |
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
This is a really good point, I agree. - Reubenkincade
I’m no guru either lol
My 1st rounders I’ve done well after that I’d close my eyes & throw darts like MG did. |
|
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: MB Joined: 01.21.2012
|
|
|
Does our entire bottom 6 have 33 goals this season? - golfingsince
Does a bottom 6 forward play the 7th most ice time on the team among forwards? |
|
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: MB Joined: 01.21.2012
|
|
|
That's right, you win with shiny top 6 players. - Reubenkincade
If you include them with better players |
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
It was fun watching the Canucks knock him around. If the Canucks can do that, imagine the abuse he’ll take in the playoffs. I’ll give him three games before he’s out with an injury. - bloatedmosquito
The signing still boggles my mind it just never made any sense to me & he hasn’t earned his 11m or proven to be a winner. Nuf said |
|
bloatedmosquito
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: I’m a dose of reality in this cesspool of glee Joined: 10.22.2011
|
|
|
The signing still boggles my mind it just never made any sense to me & he hasn’t earned his 11m or proven to be a winner. Nuf said - Nighthawk
It was glorious when he left NY and they started to win. |
|
|
|
Most seasons they are near or at the top of the league. I'd say they are a good team. If they had a star goalie, they would have gone far in the P/O's by now. - boonerbuck
I only started watching some Leafs games this year, as Golfing suggested it might be a good idea,. Other than that, I only watched them Crumble in the playoffs to the mighty Bruins, which is always fun.
Usually the only consistent player they had, was Mitch Marner. That kid is good.
As I am typing this, Marner scores. |
|
VanHockeyGuy
|
|
|
Location: “Who are we to think we’re anybody?” - Tocchet. Penticton, BC Joined: 04.26.2012
|
|
|
1-1 Providence and Northeastern.
Canucks fans might get a new shiny toy earlier than thought.
Would be excellent if his center came along with him.
https://www.eliteprospect.../296493/justin-hryckowian
Dorrington also has a cross checking penalty for an opponent coming within 5 feet of Levi. - manvanfan
If they lose that's it? |
|
|
|
The signing still boggles my mind it just never made any sense to me & he hasn’t earned his 11m or proven to be a winner. Nuf said - Nighthawk
Yet you badly wanted the Canucks to sign this guy as a UFA. |
|
golfingsince
|
|
|
Location: This message is Marwood approved! Joined: 11.30.2011
|
|
|
Does a bottom 6 forward play the 7th most ice time on the team among forwards? - manvanfan
Does a bottom 6 forward lead the team in scoring? |
|
|
|
If they lose that's it? - VanHockeyGuy
In the Canucks lineup shortly.
Always good to have these college kids burn a year. |
|
|
|
@ Vantel
How are the Oilers looking? |
|
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: MB Joined: 01.21.2012
|
|
|
If they lose that's it? - VanHockeyGuy
Pretty good chance. They just posted how they are sitting with a bunch of teams just outside of the playoffs and whoever wins there tournament has best chance of getting in.
Selection isn't till the 18th though. |
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
It was glorious when he left NY and they started to win. - bloatedmosquito
Yup but won nothing really. Just getting older & still stuck with LL. |
|
boonerbuck
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Not Quesnel, BC Joined: 10.11.2005
|
|
|
In the Canucks lineup shortly.
Always good to have these college kids burn a year. - Reubenkincade
If that's what you have to do to get signature on contract, then you have no choice really.
|
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
Yet you badly wanted the Canucks to sign this guy as a UFA. - Reubenkincade
Yup but we were in a different boat & it wasn’t for 11m. Also wouldn’t just anoint him captain. |
|
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: MB Joined: 01.21.2012
|
|
|
Does a bottom 6 forward lead the team in scoring? - golfingsince
Is Boeser a top 6 forward then?
Establishing guidelines here. |
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
If that's what you have to do to get signature on contract, then you have no choice really. - boonerbuck
Common league wide. |
|
|
|
Oilers looking like a solid team. - VANTEL
Ya, this hasn't aged well.
|
|
VanHockeyGuy
|
|
|
Location: “Who are we to think we’re anybody?” - Tocchet. Penticton, BC Joined: 04.26.2012
|
|
|
@ Vantel
How are the Oilers looking? - Reubenkincade
I know! |
|
|
|
Common league wide. - Nighthawk
Examples please.
TIA. |
|
Page: Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157, 158, 159, 160, 161, 162, 163, 164, 165, 166, 167, 168, 169 Next |