SMP8719
Vancouver Canucks |
|
 |
Location: ALDY , BC Joined: 02.24.2012
|
|
|
So the Canucks are able to play like crap and best a playoff team? Huh, all I hear is rebuild and draft draft - onesmallleap
and all you see is bubble teams with crappy draft spots and lack of pics or cap space......
So glad they finally came to play, to completely ruin any positive about this season lol |
|
SMP8719
Vancouver Canucks |
|
 |
Location: ALDY , BC Joined: 02.24.2012
|
|
|
I wonder if there is a legal out of the OEL situation, if you can prove that the severity of his knee damage was not fully released or downplayed - onesmallleap
It was obvious to every GM besides Benning.... He was on the downswing for more then one season before he was traded.
|
|
we_are_all_canucks
Vancouver Canucks |
|
 |
Location: Don't hate me because I'm really really ridiculously good looking. Joined: 09.29.2007
|
|
|
Reinbacher will be long gone and hard no to
pelican - CanuckDon
Pick 9-11? He is rising fast, but a fair number of legit draft sites have him going much lower. McKeens for example has him at 26, Bob McKenzie at 20. So we'll see.
Dragocevic (if that's how you spell it) is also interesting. Anyhoo, RHD should be the priority unless there is a can't miss C available. Would be something if Mitchkov drops into our range. |
|
K-man25
Calgary Flames |
|
 |
Location: K Town Joined: 09.02.2014
|
|
|
It was obvious to every GM besides Benning.... He was on the downswing for more then one season before he was traded. - SMP8719
Agree, giving up a top 10 pick as well. Was a desperation move, that most GM’s fall for when their job is on the line.
Like giving Huberdue a 10.5 mil contract before he even played a game. |
|
VanHockeyGuy
|
|
 |
Location: “Who are we to think we’re anybody?” - Tocchet. Penticton, BC Joined: 04.26.2012
|
|
|
Pick 9-11? He is rising fast, but a fair number of legit draft sites have him going much lower. McKeens for example has him at 26, Bob McKenzie at 20. So we'll see.
Dragocevic (if that's how you spell it) is also interesting. Anyhoo, RHD should be the priority unless there is a can't miss C available. Would be something if Mitchkov drops into our range. - we_are_all_canucks
He's the one I've been watching. Build that D.
|
|
LordHumungous
Vancouver Canucks |
|
 |
Location: Greetings from the Humungous. Ayatollah of rock and rolla! Joined: 08.15.2014
|
|
|
With all the bans, you might say this thread is being rebuilt too. - Shuswap Wap
Out with some tools and in with some tools. Sooner or later the re-tool will be complete here. 2 more years. |
|
LordHumungous
Vancouver Canucks |
|
 |
Location: Greetings from the Humungous. Ayatollah of rock and rolla! Joined: 08.15.2014
|
|
|
Agree, giving up a top 10 pick as well. Was a desperation move, that most GM’s fall for when their job is on the line.
Like giving Huberdue a 10.5 mil contract before he even played a game. - K-man25
As a Flames fan the focus should be whether Markstrom has enough sticks to finish out the season.
Seen that movie before. Kinda sh!tty. Same ending. |
|
VanHockeyGuy
|
|
 |
Location: “Who are we to think we’re anybody?” - Tocchet. Penticton, BC Joined: 04.26.2012
|
|
|
Out with some tools and in with some tools. Sooner or later the re-tool will be complete here. 2 more years. - LordHumungous
Hit on NBA tie, and 3 NHL game parlay yesterday. |
|
CanuckDon
Vancouver Canucks |
|
 |
Location: Las Vegas Joined: 08.05.2014
|
|
|
Pick 9-11? He is rising fast, but a fair number of legit draft sites have him going much lower. McKeens for example has him at 26, Bob McKenzie at 20. So we'll see.
Dragocevic (if that's how you spell it) is also interesting. Anyhoo, RHD should be the priority unless there is a can't miss C available. Would be something if Mitchkov drops into our range. - we_are_all_canucks
I mean when has the top D in the draft not been selected in the top 10? Seems highly unlikely. Size, skating and playing well in a difficult men’s league. That would be pretty shocking if he fell out of the top 10. I’m sure Bobs final list will have a defensmen in the top 10. |
|
CanuckDon
Vancouver Canucks |
|
 |
Location: Las Vegas Joined: 08.05.2014
|
|
|
He's the one I've been watching. Build that D. - VanHockeyGuy
I keep reading he is a poor skater which is somewhat alarming. I have only seen highlight videos so I’m not qualified to comment on him |
|
K-man25
Calgary Flames |
|
 |
Location: K Town Joined: 09.02.2014
|
|
|
Out with some tools and in with some tools. Sooner or later the re-tool will be complete here. 2 more years. - LordHumungous
|
|
K-man25
Calgary Flames |
|
 |
Location: K Town Joined: 09.02.2014
|
|
|
As a Flames fan the focus should be whether Markstrom has enough sticks to finish out the season.

Seen that movie before. Kinda sh!tty. Same ending. - LordHumungous
That’s the old Marky, he’s much more passive now. |
|
VanHockeyGuy
|
|
 |
Location: “Who are we to think we’re anybody?” - Tocchet. Penticton, BC Joined: 04.26.2012
|
|
|
I mean when has the top D in the draft not been selected in the top 10? Seems highly unlikely. Size, skating and playing well in a difficult men’s league. That would be pretty shocking if he fell out of the top 10. I’m sure Bobs final list will have a defensmen in the top 10. - CanuckDon
https://hockeywiz777scout...3/01/09/lukas-dragicevic/ |
|
K-man25
Calgary Flames |
|
 |
Location: K Town Joined: 09.02.2014
|
|
|
LeftCoaster
|
|
 |
Location: Valley Of The Sun Joined: 07.03.2009
|
|
|
I keep reading he is a poor skater which is somewhat alarming. I have only seen highlight videos so I’m not qualified to comment on him - CanuckDon
You’re not really qualified to speak about anything hockey related, like everyone else in the blog lol, but we love ya anyway.
PS: shot 76 today, I was on fire! 🔥 |
|
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks |
|
 |
Location: MB Joined: 01.21.2012
|
|
|
K-man25
Calgary Flames |
|
 |
Location: K Town Joined: 09.02.2014
|
|
|
You’re not really qualified to speak about anything hockey related, like everyone else in the blog lol, but we love ya anyway. 
PS: shot 76 today, I was on fire! 🔥 - LeftCoaster
Great score! How’d you shoot on the back 9?
|
|
CanuckDon
Vancouver Canucks |
|
 |
Location: Las Vegas Joined: 08.05.2014
|
|
|
You’re not really qualified to speak about anything hockey related, like everyone else in the blog lol, but we love ya anyway. 
PS: shot 76 today, I was on fire! 🔥 - LeftCoaster
Which course? |
|
dbot
Vancouver Canucks |
|
 |
Location: Auckland -Burn it all down Joined: 10.22.2008
|
|
|
Who would you rather the Canucks sign as a next year?
Severson or Dumba
Same age, UFA, RHD, etc.
|
|
LeftCoaster
|
|
 |
Location: Valley Of The Sun Joined: 07.03.2009
|
|
|
Which course? - CanuckDon
McDowell Mountain, not long (6215 yards) but narrow….4 iron off the tee a lot. |
|
K-man25
Calgary Flames |
|
 |
Location: K Town Joined: 09.02.2014
|
|
|
Which course? - CanuckDon
Golfland Sunsplash. |
|
|
|
Who would you rather the Canucks sign as a next year?
Severson or Dumba
Same age, UFA, RHD, etc. - dbot
Assuming they can clear space lol
|
|
dbot
Vancouver Canucks |
|
 |
Location: Auckland -Burn it all down Joined: 10.22.2008
|
|
|
Assuming they can clear space lol - canucksfan1944
Yes, assuming Myers is moved and both want to sign with the sh!tshow that is Vancouver and we can fit them in.
|
|
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks |
|
 |
Location: MB Joined: 01.21.2012
|
|
|
You’re not really qualified to speak about anything hockey related, like everyone else in the blog lol, but we love ya anyway. 
PS: shot 76 today, I was on fire! 🔥 - LeftCoaster
Facebook was telling me a decade ago today I was playing at Silver rock resort in La, Quinta California. Yesterday I was playing PGA West Palmer course I guess. |
|
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks |
|
 |
Location: MB Joined: 01.21.2012
|
|
|
Who would you rather the Canucks sign as a next year?
Severson or Dumba
Same age, UFA, RHD, etc. - dbot
Severson x3 |
|
Page: Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106 Next |