jofa wearin wussy!
- kicksave856

easy there man, the little viking wore Jofa...

bingo is a typical hfboards, euro slurper
- mr.peanut

there's a difference though between slurpin' euros and completely ignoring a geopolitical context lol

Probably wears a visor
- mr.peanut

une vraie tapette.

easy there man, the little viking wore Jofa...


- Pat1993

that's just what guys used to call people if someone showed up to dek hockey with their jofa helmet.

that's just what guys used to call people if someone showed up to dek hockey with their jofa helmet.
- kicksave856

yeah, I knew you weren't the kind of guy to associate an equipment brand with someone's sexual orientation...

This rebuild is going great! A bust with the first over all pick followed by a player who will never play for the team.

yeah, I knew you weren't the kind of guy to associate an equipment brand with someone's sexual orientation...
- Pat1993

i save that decision for the showers.


wait, what? no..

i save that decision for the showers.


wait, what? no..
- kicksave856

...




those are MY showers, god dang it!
-Pete

ty.


still (frank) bingo though.
- kicksave856

You keep saying that and I keep waiting for you to call but you never do

Which Aho thought?
- Mashadar

Doesn't matter. They both only put it in the Islanders net.

...




those are MY showers, god dang it!
-Pete
- Pat1993

i found new bets to make.

i have mcdavid to take over 3.5 shots.

same bet with draisaitl.

sorokin to give up over 2.5 goals.

both teams to score in the 1st period of the kings/oil game.

plus all those guys to have at least one point that i mentioned earlier (actually the draisiail bet is to have at least 2 points)

You keep saying that and I keep waiting for you to call but you never do
- BINGO!

i never really meant it that whole time!

i found new bets to make.

i have mcdavid to take over 3.5 shots.

same bet with draisaitl.

sorokin to give up over 2.5 goals.

both teams to score in the 1st period of the kings/oil game.

plus all those guys to have at least one point that i mentioned earlier (actually the draisiail bet is to have at least 2 points)
- kicksave856

those seem like sound bets.

what are McDavid's and Drycycle's averages for shots on net per game? probably higher than 4 I would assume.

those seem like sound bets.

what are McDavid's and Drycycle's averages for shots on net per game? probably higher than 4 I would assume.
- Pat1993

i didn't even look. i just went with blind faith that those are the guys that take the most shots. sometimes the payout helps show you too. i could tell by the payouts that these were the players most likely to win the bet. they payout goes up the more ridiculous it is. like a dollar might pay $0.81 on mcdavid to get 4 shots, but a dollar might pay $1.50 if you make the same bet on kailer yamamoto.

i didn't even look. i just went with blind faith that those are the guys that take the most shots. sometimes the payout helps show you too. i could tell by the payouts that these were the players most likely to win the bet. they payout goes up the more ridiculous it is. like a dollar might pay $0.81 on mcdavid to get 4 shots, but a dollar might pay $1.50 if you make the same bet on kailer yamamoto.
- kicksave856

makes sense, if you want to make more money you have to be able to identify those unlikely picks.

makes sense, if you want to make more money you have to be able to identify those unlikely picks.
- Pat1993

yeah. doing that is so much easier betting football than hockey though. hockey really is hard to bet. baseball too. i guess that's why i try the in-game bet thing and wait to see how the first period is going. just trying to get any advantage on my one dollar bet lol!

i did forget all about zach hyman back there. weeeee!

yeah. doing that is so much easier betting football than hockey though. hockey really is hard to bet. baseball too. i guess that's why i try the in-game bet thing and wait to see how the first period is going. just trying to get any advantage on my one dollar bet lol!
- kicksave856

besides in the long run it's probably way more advantageous to rely on winning multiple smaller yet safer bets than betting on risky poop.

besides in the long run it's probably way more advantageous to rely on winning multiple smaller yet safer bets than betting on risky poop.
- Pat1993

for sure. if i was betting big chunks of money like real people do that's the way i'd try to go i think. just chip away and slowly build a pile of money. every little once in a while try a long shot but mostly just chip away.

i did forget all about zach hyman back there. weeeee!
- kicksave856

can be hard to find

for sure. if i was betting big chunks of money like real people do that's the way i'd try to go i think. just chip away and slowly build a pile of money. every little once in a while try a long shot but mostly just chip away.
- kicksave856

- Pat1993

can be hard to find
- deadpoulet

- kicksave856

aw. it's like that chicken is shy about asking for lewd stuff.

aw. it's like that chicken is shy about asking for lewd stuff.
- Pat1993

spicy chicken.

chicken pad shy.