So, wouldn't you think that we don't have the full story? Like, if it makes no sense, there has to be more info not made public. Maybe he was tipping off others about injuries or something like that. Obviously, they felt like the integrity of the game was jeopardized if they are handing out a suspension like that. - Tonybere
So, wouldn't you think that we don't have the full story? Like, if it makes no sense, there has to be more info not made public. Maybe he was tipping off others about injuries or something like that. Obviously, they felt like the integrity of the game was jeopardized if they are handing out a suspension like that.
Edit: Also, your avatar looks too much like Jim's!! It's going to get ugly when someone mistakes something one of you posted for the other!! - Tonybere
So, wouldn't you think that we don't have the full story? Like, if it makes no sense, there has to be more info not made public. Maybe he was tipping off others about injuries or something like that. Obviously, they felt like the integrity of the game was jeopardized if they are handing out a suspension like that.
Edit:
Also, your avatar looks too much like Jim's!! It's going to get ugly when someone mistakes something one of you posted for the other!! - Tonybere
I can change my avatar. As for the story, we probably don't have the full story, but it's been reported that he didn't bet on hockey. (Allegedly). So I don't see the issue if that is the case.
I can change my avatar. As for the story, we probably don't have the full story, but it's been reported that he didn't bet on hockey. (Allegedly). So I don't see the issue if that is the case. - blacksheep1
I'm not understanding the lack of transparency here.
So I guess based on the vague wording doesnt it necessarily mean he was betting on another sport but could be that someone else was betting on hockey and he had something to do with it?