Marwood
|
|
|
Location: Cumberland, BC Joined: 03.18.2010
|
|
|
Myers and Soucy got hurt on the same shift - NorthNuck
Was that expected? |
|
|
|
Was that expected? - Marwood
|
|
NorthNuck
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Yellowknife, NWT Joined: 05.30.2016
|
|
|
Was that expected? - Marwood
Absolute comedy genius
|
|
NewYorkNuck
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: New York, NY Joined: 07.11.2015
|
|
|
Was that expected? - Marwood
xChaos/60 was too high this season for it not to happen, they were beating the odds as it were the past few weeks |
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
Ben Kuzma 🇺🇦
@benkuzma
·
58m
No Soucy (foot). No Myers. Recalled Hirose on practice ice at UBC. #Canucks
...............................................................................
Myers and 2025 second round pick for Zadarov? - VANTEL
Overpayment |
|
NorthNuck
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Yellowknife, NWT Joined: 05.30.2016
|
|
|
xChaos/60 was too high this season for it not to happen, they were beating the odds as it were the past few weeks - NewYorkNuck
This is true |
|
|
|
Overpayment - Nighthawk
We gave up a second to get rid of Stillman, and a third to get Dermott for 18 games, so how much of an overpayment can it be?
|
|
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: MB Joined: 01.21.2012
|
|
|
5 of 5 - VANTEL
I don't believe Vancouver was on the Stanley cup contenders list instead it was Colorado. |
|
|
|
I don't believe Vancouver was on the Stanley cup contenders list instead it was Colorado. - manvanfan
They never asked Nighthawk before they did the survey.
|
|
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: MB Joined: 01.21.2012
|
|
|
They never asked Nighthawk before they did the survey. - VANTEL
Just Eastern media members. |
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
We gave up a second to get rid of Stillman, and a third to get Dermott for 18 games, so how much of an overpayment can it be? - VANTEL
Dlckinson/2nd for Stillman
Stillman for Bloom |
|
|
|
Dlckinson/2nd for Stillman
Stillman for Bloom - Nighthawk
Even worse
|
|
Pacificgem
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Linden4Ever, BC Joined: 07.01.2007
|
|
|
xChaos/60 was too high this season for it not to happen, they were beating the odds as it were the past few weeks - NewYorkNuck
|
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
Even worse
- VANTEL
Didn’t age well 😂 |
|
boonerbuck
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Not Quesnel, BC Joined: 10.11.2005
|
|
|
QH 40 to 1 to win the Hart. Might be a decent bet to make. Realistically, how many players are ahead of him do you think? |
|
NorthNuck
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Yellowknife, NWT Joined: 05.30.2016
|
|
|
QH 40 to 1 to win the Hart. Might be a decent bet to make. Realistically, how many players are ahead of him do you think? - boonerbuck
If Pettersson gets over 100 points he won't win it. Split votes. I think odds are low of any Canuck winning honestly, if they continue to play the way they have, Demko will get consideration too |
|
|
|
If Pettersson gets over 100 points he won't win it. Split votes. I think odds are low of any Canuck winning honestly, if they continue to play the way they have, Demko will get consideration too - NorthNuck
According to the stats people this team is going to nose dive so none of that matters.
|
|
Marwood
|
|
|
Location: Cumberland, BC Joined: 03.18.2010
|
|
|
According to the stats people this team is going to nose dive so none of that matters. - VANTEL
|
|
NorthNuck
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Yellowknife, NWT Joined: 05.30.2016
|
|
|
According to the stats people this team is going to nose dive so none of that matters. - VANTEL
As yes, the omnipotent force that is "stats people" 👻
Good thing everyone who *looks at stats* all agree with each other. |
|
|
|
As yes, the omnipotent force that is "stats people" 👻
Good thing everyone who *looks at stats* all agree with each other. - NorthNuck
I look at it this way. Some people need to be showed how to sit back to watch and enjoy a hockey game and others can just do it. I could care less about advanced stats, but those of them that need them or enjoy them then knock yourselves out.
A couple of us older people just sit back and enjoy the game and are just as correct as the people who are selling you their swampland and telling you what you should be looking for . Choose to follow them or not, your choice.
|
|
NorthNuck
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Yellowknife, NWT Joined: 05.30.2016
|
|
|
I look at it this way. Some people need to be showed how to sit back to watch and enjoy a hockey game and others can just do it. I could care less about advanced stats, but those of them that need them or enjoy them then knock yourselves out.
A couple of us older people just sit back and enjoy the game and are just as correct as the people who are selling you their swampland and telling you what you should be looking for . Choose to follow them or not, your choice. - VANTEL
I would never argue that anyone needs to read into stats or advanced stats to enjoy hockey, but refusing to acknowledge their usefulness in understanding the game is just silly. There's a reason those stats graphics are sprinkled through every broadcast you watch.
I don't need anything to enjoy a game other than my big screen TV and comfy ass couch
I like reading into advanced stats and analytics after the games, or whenever interesting stuff pops up in my Twitter feed. It's really not an either or situation. |
|
|
|
I would never argue that anyone needs to read into stats or advanced stats to enjoy hockey, but refusing to acknowledge their usefulness in understanding the game is just silly.
I don't need anything to enjoy a game other than my big screen TV and comfy ass couch
I like reading into advanced stats and analytics after the games, or whenever interesting stuff pops up in my Twitter feed. It's really not an either or situation. - NorthNuck
|
|
|
|
I look at it this way. Some people need to be showed how to sit back to watch and enjoy a hockey game and others can just do it. I could care less about advanced stats, but those of them that need them or enjoy them then knock yourselves out.
A couple of us older people just sit back and enjoy the game and are just as correct as the people who are selling you their swampland and telling you what you should be looking for . Choose to follow them or not, your choice. - VANTEL
Yup 👍 |
|
Pacificgem
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Linden4Ever, BC Joined: 07.01.2007
|
|
|
I look at it this way. Some people need to be showed how to sit back to watch and enjoy a hockey game and others can just do it. I could care less about advanced stats, but those of them that need them or enjoy them then knock yourselves out.
A couple of us older people just sit back and enjoy the game and are just as correct as the people who are selling you their swampland and telling you what you should be looking for . Choose to follow them or not, your choice. - VANTEL
You don’t “need” any stats to just sit and enjoy a game. I don’t think any fans sit on their computer and dissect stats while the games ongoing. That’s for the Thomas Drance and social media types. To post on X.
For fans imo it’s just a way of looking ahead or behind, between games, as a predictor to see how they’re measuring up. |
|
Pacificgem
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Linden4Ever, BC Joined: 07.01.2007
|
|
|
I would never argue that anyone needs to read into stats or advanced stats to enjoy hockey, but refusing to acknowledge their usefulness in understanding the game is just silly. There's a reason those stats graphics are sprinkled through every broadcast you watch.
I don't need anything to enjoy a game other than my big screen TV and comfy ass couch
I like reading into advanced stats and analytics after the games, or whenever interesting stuff pops up in my Twitter feed. It's really not an either or situation. - NorthNuck
Nothing beats a big ole comfy couch with a cold drink sitting there watching your team, or one of your teams lol, all the while throwing foam bricks at your 80 inch screen. |
|