Why would you want to get rid of nylander? Hes not your problem

Why would you want to get rid of nylander? Hes not your problem
- LFS

We don't... and by "we", I mean the posters who aren't freebasing dishwasher tabs.

Reaves is gonna catch 1st overall pick Engvall in Montreal in goals soon.

Tampa 6-2 over Carolina. Already in a playoff spot and Vasi is back. Does the resident know it all still think they are likely to not make the playoffs.
- jribout

A well constructed team.
They lose their most important player didnt fall back much

Why would you want to get rid of nylander? Hes not your problem
- LFS

We dont.
But we simply cannot have $45m tied up in 4 forwards.
Specially if we have to sign McDavid in 2 years


So either willie or marner will have to go eventually. Even if JT and willie switch cap hits in a years time.

Fixed.
- .OHOH.

Don’t be so hard on yourself.

We dont.
But we simply cannot have $45m tied up in 4 forwards.
Specially if we have to sign McDavid in 2 years


So either willie or marner will have to go eventually. Even if JT and willie switch cap hits in a years time.
- Fakepartofme

They don’t have to lose either of them. With Willie at $10.5M, they can give Liljegren a raise, bring up Minten or a Marlie for the 4th line and you have almost $20M to replace or extend Bertuzzi, Domi, Sami, Brodie and Gio.

https://twitter.com/Hocke...tatus/1728442264375161100

Kid showing his hands are more than just for getting goals.

https://twitter.com/Hocke...tatus/1728442264375161100

Kid showing his hands are more than just for getting goals.
- GreatGigInTheSky

I feel like he’d get murdered in the NHL throwing those pillows.

I feel like he’d get murdered in the NHL throwing those pillows.
- Arctic_AARDVARK

He tagged and, frankly, beat the poop out of a guy that looked to be visibly a lot bigger than him.

EDIT: Roman Rukavishnikov 231 and Nikita Grebyonkin 192

Yup

I feel like he’d get murdered in the NHL throwing those pillows.
- Arctic_AARDVARK

lucky for him, we'll never know

We dont.
But we simply cannot have $45m tied up in 4 forwards.
Specially if we have to sign McDavid in 2 years


So either willie or marner will have to go eventually. Even if JT and willie switch cap hits in a years time.
- Fakepartofme

It's been basically 8 wasted years of an elite C to build around, and why some of us wanted this core broken up many years ago. But the Kreskins in here know better and like their 'nice things' too much.

It's been basically 8 wasted years of an elite C to build around, and why some of us wanted this core broken up many years ago. But the Kreskins in here know better and like their 'nice things' too much.
- fifty__missions

But it doesn’t matter what any of us think or say in here. We’re not the ones making the decisions.

It's been basically 8 wasted years of an elite C to build around, and why some of us wanted this core broken up many years ago. But the Kreskins in here know better and like their 'nice things' too much.
- fifty__missions

I wouldn’t mind moving Marner.

But a Makar/Hughes/Point/Petterson has to be coming back.

If they move Willy you’ll be getting a very good player, but I’d prefer to target a prospect. Get Lane Hutson or Brandt Clarke. Focus on rebuilding the culture for another year and position the team to be able to sign McDavid.

That’s how the fairytale story ends. McDavid comes home, Lord Stanley comes home.

Willy and TJ for Lane and Arbor

2026 TML

Tavares McDavid Marner
Robertson Matthews Knies
Bertuzzi Domi Cowan
Steeves Minten Grebenkin

Rielly Hutson
Xhekaj Liljegren
Niemela Lagesson
Timmins

It's been basically 8 wasted years of an elite C to build around, and why some of us wanted this core broken up many years ago. But the Kreskins in here know better and like their 'nice things' too much.
- fifty__missions

The notion that breaking up the core and its a fail proof plan to improve the team is a large assumption and gamble. It's more likely such a move or moves woukd end in regret than success because it's not unrealistic to believe they would be passing along the best player in the trade.

The notion that breaking up the core and its a fail proof plan to improve the team is a large assumption and gamble. It's more likely such a move or moves woukd end in regret than success because it's not unrealistic to believe they would be passing along the best player in the trade.
- systemtool

Its not fail proof at all, but we do know what hasnt worked so far.
Its not necessarily about getting the best player in the trade, but more about creating cap space, getting picks, getting a new look or spreading out the talent.
Or if the cap goes up a lot, keep them together. See if we can get a different result.
But they may llose out on McDavid

Why would you want to get rid of nylander? Hes not your problem
- LFS

It would be a fear-based blunder advocated for by your flimsier Leaf fan. Some would have traded him for any journeyman Dman, and he'd be having this MVP year elsewhere while they blamed Keefe

new blog everyone