That’s a Fact… Ducks need serious announcers upgrade.
- dozerD10

Nobody is worse than Jack Edwards nor ever will be.

The NYI announcers call their players by their nicknames or by first names. And then proceed to butcher Lilly’s name repeatedly. Lol

It sounds so Unprofessional “Barzy with a great pass there to Dobber” etc. like (frank) off your not Jonsey and Reily from Letterkenny.

(frank)ing embarrassing bud! Lol
- Cush29

Aah who was that fella saying Cornwire? 🤪

Marner was on the ice for 3 against though.🤣
- jribout

Are you sure?
How did he end up with a +1 and willie -1if that were the case?

Remember when peeps were saying they wouldn't make the playoffs?

Still could happen, but damn theyve looked good.
- Fakepartofme

So goalies that are atrocious can bounce back?

Are you sure?
How did he end up with a +1 and willie -1if that were the case?
- Fakepartofme

Marner was on ice on 5 goals. 2 for and 3 against. Both for was EV, therefore 2+. Of the 3 against, 2 was on Isles PP, therefore only 1-. 2+ -1 = +1.
Willie was only on ice when Isles scored EV, therefore -1.
https://www.nhl.com/score...rts/20232024/GS020646.HTM
Capiche?

So goalies that are atrocious can bounce back?
- drexel

Only from 31 teams not named the Leafs.

Nobody is worse than Jack Edwards nor ever will be.
- Nighthawk

This is very true.

Marner was on ice on 5 goals. 2 for and 3 against. Both for was EV, therefore 2+. Of the 3 against, 2 was on Isles PP, therefore only 1-. 2+ -1 = +1.
Willie was only on ice when Isles scored EV, therefore -1.
https://www.nhl.com/score...rts/20232024/GS020646.HTM
Capiche?
- 21peter

That was pretty much a special teams loss last night

Marner was on ice on 5 goals. 2 for and 3 against. Both for was EV, therefore 2+. Of the 3 against, 2 was on Isles PP, therefore only 1-. 2+ -1 = +1.
Willie was only on ice when Isles scored EV, therefore -1.
https://www.nhl.com/score...rts/20232024/GS020646.HTM
Capiche?
- 21peter

Capiche.
My feeling is if marner was on the ice for 5 goals, 2 for and 3 against, he should be -1...but i guess they take pk's into consideration.

Still not a fan of +/-

Oh damm that doesn’t sound good.

The other thing I thought sucked in the NYI broadcast was they call the blue line “the blue” and the centre line “the red”. I’m like nobody calls it that you pylons. Lol
- Cush29

Pat Quinn called it the blue.

Capiche.
My feeling is if marner was on the ice for 5 goals, 2 for and 3 against, he should be -1...but i guess they take pk's into consideration.

Still not a fan of +/-
- Fakepartofme

I was also unaware of the fact the +/- is not impacted if a player is on the ice and give up a goal when on the PK. Does a player get a + if you they are on the ice and you score a short handed goal?

So anyone who says a player with a crummy +/- isn't because the player is bad it's because they kill penalties is using a false narrative.

Interesting and I guess is some ways makes the +/- more meaningful?

Pat Quinn called it the blue.
- Zezel

Dammit now I don't hate it so much but I somehow doubt Mutt and Jeff the NYI broadcasters are using that term due to Pat Quinn. lol

Dammit now I don't hate it so much but I somehow doubt Mutt and Jeff the NYI broadcasters are using that term due to Pat Quinn. lol
- Cush29

Yeah, (frank) those guys.

I was also unaware of the fact the +/- is not impacted if a player is on the ice and give up a goal when on the PK. Does a player get a + if you they are on the ice and you score a short handed goal?

So anyone who says a player with a crummy +/- isn't because the player is bad it's because they kill penalties is using a false narrative.

Interesting and I guess is some ways makes the +/- more meaningful?
- Cush29

+/- is only an even strength stat.

+/- is only an even strength stat.
- The Law

Yeah, I'll be that guy:

If you score short-handed, that's a +.

If you give up a short-handed goal, that's a -.

Have we signed Perry yet?

I'm assuming MLSE will hold a news conference at the Brunswick House, just before last call.

Yeah, I'll be that guy:

If you score short-handed, that's a +.

If you give up a short-handed goal, that's a -.
- Atomic Wedgie

Sorry ...you're right. The bonus provisions for those hardworking PK'ers.


Also ....is Gio done? He looked a little rough last night.

Yeah, I'll be that guy:

If you score short-handed, that's a +.

If you give up a short-handed goal, that's a -.
- Atomic Wedgie

also empty net goals count.

Sorry ...you're right. The bonus provisions for those hardworking PK'ers.


Also ....is Gio done? He looked a little rough last night.
- The Law

If you are basing your assessment off of last night, let's start with McCabe first.

also empty net goals count.
- senstroll

Yup, technically still even strength (or PK).

-9C this morning on Van Isle 🥶

-9C this morning on Van Isle 🥶
- mr.sir

-45 in the wind here. Sack up a bit

If you are basing your assessment off of last night, let's start with McCabe first.
- Atomic Wedgie

Ignore the OT and McCabe was pretty good.

Rielly n Brodie were great.
McCabe and Benoit were solid.
Lilly was okay.
Gio struggled.

I noticed the Isles were trying to match Horvat's line on Gio whenever they could. When they had the match up Gio struggled.

Isles first PP goal ...Jones with the miss on the blocker save ..but Gio has got to do better in front.

He's been alright but looked out of gas at times last night. I think he ends up being #7 come playoffs.

-45 in the wind here. Sack up a bit
- drexel

Heading to work where it’s-17C
Not including windchill
-23C with

Ignore the OT and McCabe was pretty good.

Rielly n Brodie were great.
McCabe and Benoit were solid.
Lilly was okay.
Gio struggled.

I noticed the Isles were trying to match Horvat's line on Gio whenever they could. When they had the match up Gio struggled.

Isles first PP goal ...Jones with the miss on the blocker save ..but Gio has got to do better in front.

He's been alright but looked out of gas at times last night. I think he ends up being #7 come playoffs.
- The Law

The bad blocker save was weird, and he sorta did it again later in the game.

WTF?