manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: MB Joined: 01.21.2012
|
|
|
Quite the mixed bag. Good bad and fair deals. Myers at 2x2.6 is a great deal I think. Petey at 7x 10.8 is fair. Lindholm at 7x8 is scary. Z at 4x5.1 is ridiculous.
Hronek is a tough call at that estimate. You love having that top pair... but wow... - boonerbuck
A couple of "deals" from the spreadsheet have already gone through (Tippett, Richardinson) and they aren't too bad with an error rate less than 5% except for the Nick Foligno deal being a 4 year deal at 4.25 for an absolute garbage player that would never get that deal anywhere else except for that poop show.
Here's the link if you want to see. I suggest the mid guys sign early honestly because they are the guys that seem to lose out in the summer time after stars are signed and the money dries up.
https://docs.google.com/s...edit?pli=1#gid=1228449332 |
|
boonerbuck
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Not Quesnel, BC Joined: 10.11.2005
|
|
|
No team is offering Mik for an cheaper less term contract unless there is something added by Canucks. No one.
There either has to be a equally unpopular contract coming back or assets added.
So until you give me a trade offer with names he stays on your salary cap. - VANTEL
You have them accepting your trade proposal. Why? Because you said?
I'll leave it up to management to make a deal. I don't buy that Risto is the only trade in the league available for Miky and a 2nd or what ever package they decide to put together. If you think that package can land them a RD, then it would certainly land something else and free up cap space in the summer. Don't be so arrogant.
|
|
boonerbuck
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Not Quesnel, BC Joined: 10.11.2005
|
|
|
I was agreeing with you. I am fine.
Do I next go from struggling again today to being a liar in my next post?
I had seen you said it was a bargain and I said yeah why would he? - VANTEL
Where you go from here is up to you but historically, the weeks and days leading up to the TDL have been difficult for you. You throw so much at the wall hoping for stuff to stick and will defend all of it to the death. Regardless if one idea contradicts the other.
|
|
|
|
You have them accepting your trade proposal. Why? Because you said?
I'll leave it up to management to make a deal. I don't buy that Risto is the only trade in the league available for Miky and a 2nd or what ever package they decide to put together. If you think that package can land them a RD, then it would certainly land something else and free up cap space in the summer. Don't be so arrogantD. - boonerbuck
At least I am not a liar today.
So Tor and Cal are reportedly in the mix also to get Risto but Canucks (seeing we are nice guys) will win the bidding war by giving them an overpaid fourth liners with term.
I am sure Tor or Cgy have nothing better to offer than a Mik straight up type of deal.
Maybe Tor can offer a Reaves straight up for Risto.
|
|
|
|
Where you go from here is up to you but historically, the weeks and days leading up to the TDL have been difficult for you. You throw so much at the wall hoping for stuff to stick and will defend all of it to the death. Regardless if one idea contradicts the other.
- boonerbuck
You are getting into your Booner frame of mind now.
|
|
|
|
boonerbuck
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Not Quesnel, BC Joined: 10.11.2005
|
|
|
At least I am not a liar today.
So Tor and Cal are reportedly in the mix also to get Risto but Canucks (seeing we are nice guys) will win the bidding war by giving them an overpaid fourth liners with term.
I am sure Tor or Cgy have nothing better to offer than a Mik straight up type of deal.
Maybe Tor can offer a Reaves straight up for Risto. - VANTEL
See you are putting word in my mouth. I never said you weren't a liar.
|
|
|
|
See you are putting word in my mouth. I never said you weren't a liar.
- boonerbuck
You did yesterday.
|
|
boonerbuck
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Not Quesnel, BC Joined: 10.11.2005
|
|
|
Boston lose. - VANTEL
The Measuring Stix lose again.
|
|
boonerbuck
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Not Quesnel, BC Joined: 10.11.2005
|
|
|
You did yesterday. - VANTEL
Nope.
|
|
Pacificgem
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Swedish4Ever, BC Joined: 07.01.2007
|
|
|
Canucks wouldn’t touch Rasmus Ristolainen with a ten foot pole…give it up boys, he improved to where he’s now just ok third pairing dman for 5.1 million a year. |
|
boonerbuck
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Not Quesnel, BC Joined: 10.11.2005
|
|
|
Canucks wouldn’t touch Rasmus Ristolainen with a ten foot pole…give it up boys, he improved to where he’s now just ok third pairing dman for 5.1 million a year. - Pacificgem
Boys? One person.
|
|
Pacificgem
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Swedish4Ever, BC Joined: 07.01.2007
|
|
|
Boys? One person.
- boonerbuck
I wasn’t really following the conversation because you’re all nut-jobs, just sayin. |
|
boonerbuck
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Not Quesnel, BC Joined: 10.11.2005
|
|
|
I wasn’t really following the conversation because you’re all nut-jobs, just sayin. - Pacificgem
|
|
|
|
Boys? One person.
- boonerbuck
And two or three GMs.
|
|
|
|
I get to smoke a joint before the game again finally |
|
|
|
Canucks wouldn’t touch Rasmus Ristolainen with a ten foot pole…give it up boys, he improved to where he’s now just ok third pairing dman for 5.1 million a year. - Pacificgem
You do realize we are paying a fourth liner 4.75 mil.
|
|
dbot
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Auckland -Burn it all down Joined: 10.22.2008
|
|
|
golfingsince
|
|
|
Location: This message is Marwood approved! Joined: 11.30.2011
|
|
|
Risto can suck a Richard.
I certainly don't trade Mik for him looking towards next season.
We have enough Big D that aren't the greatest defenders.
If he's available now he's certainly there in the offseason. The extra salary and extra year are a big deal, even if the numbers fit this season. |
|
boonerbuck
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Not Quesnel, BC Joined: 10.11.2005
|
|
|
Pacificgem
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Swedish4Ever, BC Joined: 07.01.2007
|
|
|
You do realize we are paying a fourth liner 4.75 mil. - VANTEL
No need to go full Benning and add more…right? |
|
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: MB Joined: 01.21.2012
|
|
|
Canucks wouldn’t touch Rasmus Ristolainen with a ten foot pole…give it up boys, he improved to where he’s now just ok third pairing dman for 5.1 million a year. - Pacificgem
Only here can a player be talked about after the Canucks #1 rumour source has shut it down completely. |
|
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: MB Joined: 01.21.2012
|
|
|
No need to go full Benning and add more…right? - Pacificgem
Player plays 50% of his time with a top 6 center and once is listed on the 4th line and he's automatically a 4th liner. |
|
golfingsince
|
|
|
Location: This message is Marwood approved! Joined: 11.30.2011
|
|
|
No need to go full Benning and add more…right? - Pacificgem
Between OEL's buyout and Risto's salary we could replace OEL for only 20% more than OEL |
|
|
|
No need to go full Benning and add more…right? - Pacificgem
Just a little off the subject here but I wonder how long it is going to take the fans to turn on PA after he has to sign new contracts for half the team next year.
|
|