Meh, I'm out. Apparently no normal discussion allowed anymore

My style of writing seems to lean toward being read as angry!! I was making a joke by saying what I did. All good here, man!
I try to wipe the slate clean after every conversation, no matter who is involved. Sometimes I can't take the negativity and blow up, but I'm rather mercurial that way. It's vented and gone quickly.
I haven't had a full-on, lasting dislike for anyone here since we saw the end of Dundee.
- Tonybere

I mean when you go after people's religion and use the f word that rhymes with maggot in sense where you actually mean it, yeah I can see why people would dislike him.

No, it wasn't. I always correct my typos. Too OCD to do otherwise.
- Tonybere

Whatever, the point I was joking because the line is do you smell toast when people answer with something that is odd.

the "we didn't deserve to beat Colorado" charts set us back several years
- jimbro83

See, I just see those as saying that despite being outplayed by the opponent in certain areas, we found a way to win - which is all that matters.

I was happy Lafreniere got the empty netter last night because he was robbed about 5 times by that goalie

Kucherov should be the MVP. I despise everything TB, but what he does for that team is nuts. Something like 50.6% (as of a week or two ago) of their goals he’s had a point on. They simply aren’t a playoff team without him
- Slimtj100

Release the Rempage!

See, I just see those as saying that despite being outplayed by the opponent in certain areas, we found a way to win - which is all that matters.
- Tonybere

I'll answer that. In the playoffs, yes if you play a game like that and win: take the win and move on. The point of the charts is, the games vs the Avs, Flyers, and Coyotes is that if you have those kinds of games in the playoffs, teams would normal lose. Also, with Colorado game, I said thank you Igor, because they got to that game and won because Igor was great. No shootouts in the playoffs. (i know you know all of that, just want to enhance what the initial post was after that game.)

See, I just see those as saying that despite being outplayed by the opponent in certain areas, we found a way to win - which is all that matters.
- Tonybere

back in the old days, we'd win a game like that and opposing team fans when come in here tell us we got lucky and didn't deserve it, not our own people

unless the bottom drops out the next 4 games, this is the best Rangers regular season EVER.

EVER

100 years

Im amazed

Release the Rempage!
- Fenrir

Not for nothing..but when he’s on the ice the puck is rarely in the offensive zone and we’re hemmed in the dzone his whole shift. I love the kid but I don’t think he’s helping enough to play regularly. Hes a step slow, but I get why he plays. Just not sure he should be playing playoff games (unless there is a reason to dress him)

The 4th line SHOULD be imo-
goodrow JBrod Vesey. That line has made a lot of good plays recently. They mentioned on the radio a couple times of JBrod being the center on that line and it making a difference, Goodrow being better on the wing

Not for nothing..but when he’s on the ice the puck is rarely in the offensive zone and we’re hemmed in the dzone his whole shift. I love the kid but I don’t think he’s helping enough to play regularly. Hes a step slow, but I get why he plays. Just not sure he should be playing playoff games (unless there is a reason to dress him)

The 4th line SHOULD be imo-
goodrow JBrod Vesey. That line has made a lot of good plays recently. They mentioned on the radio a couple times of JBrod being the center on that line and it making a difference, Goodrow being better on the wing
- Slimtj100

Tj, I love you. 4 out of every 5 shifts I think that.

New blog up

Tj, I love you. 4 out of every 5 shifts I think that.
- blacksheep1

It’s just too risky to play him. I get the whole love affair with him tho. Especially at the game for the fans, but he’s almost like a side show now. Have to be smart with the lineup