Wanna blog? Start your own hockey blog with My HockeyBuzz. Register for free today!
 
Forums :: Blog World :: Brad Lohr: Big Pick in Helenius, Malenstyn get Acquired and we Praise Adams....
Author Message
Buff36
Buffalo Sabres
Joined: 10.13.2019

Jul 6 @ 12:33 PM ET
https://www.expectedbuffalo.com/buffalo-sabres-ryan-mcleods-addition-points-to-a-bet-on-the-data/

>>> One player I would take off of the list is Ehlers. He seems to be what I’ve dubbed “fake available.” The Winnipeg Jets are listening on him, but the price is outrageous. They can tell the story of trying to move him, but the offers weren’t good enough so they’ll keep him.

- kingcong39

Carolina has more to offer anyway
Slump Buster
Buffalo Sabres
Location: GM's are graded based on moves made before June 28th, apparently., NY
Joined: 10.24.2006

Jul 6 @ 12:38 PM ET
The Sabres have a lot of chips left to trade. Like still too many for the number of roster spots.

Removing savoie. We will have

Ostlund
Kulich
Helenius
Rosen
Komarov
Wahlberg
Ryan Johnson (if you want to call him a prospect still)

- Sabretooth9


And next year's first. That's enough to get done pretty much anything that you want to get one.
Stripes77
Referee
Buffalo Sabres
Location: Where ever Matt Ellis allows me to be, NY
Joined: 07.30.2012

Jul 6 @ 12:40 PM ET
I'm right back to not expecting any more moves.

They don't have many chips left. If that's all they could do with Savoie, Rosen isn't worth moving. If Kulich is the unmovable guy, then you're just left with Ostlund. Maybe Johnson, but Joker is on a 1 year and their D pipeline is weak. Trading future picks is the unsustainable approach KA's been preaching against since he's been here. Certainly possibly everything he's said for years vanished in the wind.

- Lunaion


Ostlund Krebs/Greenway and a 2025 top 10 protected 1st can get you a nice piece. But I am with you. I don’t think there’s another move to expect.
Powerslave
Buffalo Sabres
Location: Arriving Somewhere But Not Here
Joined: 02.10.2011

Jul 6 @ 12:40 PM ET
I don't know this McLeod guy from a hole in the wall but from what I'm reading, a decent 3rd line center with a decent 200ft game... Correct?...

If so, this has Lindy's prints all over it as the Sabres continue to put together one of the most boring teams since the 2024 Islanders.

As far as Savoie... By far their most talented offensive prospect. I think this kid could develop into a Brayden Point type player.

This is scary to watch as a Sabre fan. They've had a paradigm shift in philosophy from accumulate highly talented prospects with a run them out of your building type of game to trap/grind em out kind of wins.

Either way... Edmonton absolutely fleeced a GM who is clearly in over his head.

- JYD



THEY'VE TRADED LITERALLY ONE PROSPECT 😂😂😂 Some of you on here act like we just gutted our prospect pool.

This is what everyone wanted. It was the price of doing business for what the Sabres needed. Last time I checked, no one around the league has traded any top 6 forwards (Mangiapane and his 14 goals? Nice try). If this is the price to get a good 3C, what are the prices to get a top 6 F??? Greenway+Krebs+ isn't going to get you Ehlers. If is does, KA should get GM of the year.

They traded for a legitimate NHL player with legitimate NHL attributes. You gave up what? A question mark? A maybe? A prospect? A suspect (as Ted Nolan used to call them)? Someone who might? Well he might be this, he might be that. Who cares?

One piece at a time (and I ripped him pretty good after day 1) he is doing exactly what everyone said this team needed.

kingcong39
Buffalo Sabres
Location: albany, NY
Joined: 02.21.2007

Jul 6 @ 12:41 PM ET
Well we have McLeod now, so flip him for Michkov instead. He's a 50pt 3C that skates like McDavid and was a filthy playmaker in juniors.
- RhinoFan


You didn't even like Savoie, and said he had issues that wouldn't work in the NHL.

You've gone off the deep end the other way.

Then there's also this...

>>> The hype at times was overstated on Savoie. First and foremost, his value around the league was a sign of this. Savoie was the prospect the Sabres were making available in their trade discussions. Other clubs were more interested in other prospects, including 2023 second-round pick Anton Wahlberg, but the Sabres kept coming back to Savoie as the piece.
kingcong39
Buffalo Sabres
Location: albany, NY
Joined: 02.21.2007

Jul 6 @ 12:43 PM ET
Ostlund Krebs/Greenway and a 2025 top 10 protected 1st can get you a nice piece. But I am with you. I don’t think there’s another move to expect.
- Stripes77


>>> Based on discussions I’ve had, I would anticipate the Sabres stepping away from the table for a few weeks. Allow the trade market to settle and then at the end of July see if a winger shakes free from another team.

The Philadelphia Flyers haven’t moved one of their forwards and the Trevor Zegras rumors continue. There are other options for them to consider as well.
Lunaion
Joined: 05.23.2016

Jul 6 @ 12:44 PM ET
The Sabres have a lot of chips left to trade. Like still too many for the number of roster spots.

Removing savoie. We will have

Ostlund
Kulich
Helenius
Rosen
Komarov
Wahlberg
Ryan Johnson (if you want to call him a prospect still)

- Sabretooth9


You skipped over the part where I covered most of that.

Helenius, Kulich, and Wahlberg are their favorites. Extremely unlikely to move. Covered Johnson, Rosen, and Ostlund. Komarov is a B chip.
Powerslave
Buffalo Sabres
Location: Arriving Somewhere But Not Here
Joined: 02.10.2011

Jul 6 @ 12:44 PM ET
>>> Based on discussions I’ve had, I would anticipate the Sabres stepping away from the table for a few weeks. Allow the trade market to settle and then at the end of July see if a winger shakes free from another team.

The Philadelphia Flyers haven’t moved one of their forwards and the Trevor Zegras rumors continue. There are other options for them to consider as well.

- kingcong39



Where are these bullet points coming from? Was this another Lance Q&A?
Stripes77
Referee
Buffalo Sabres
Location: Where ever Matt Ellis allows me to be, NY
Joined: 07.30.2012

Jul 6 @ 12:45 PM ET
>>> Based on discussions I’ve had, I would anticipate the Sabres stepping away from the table for a few weeks. Allow the trade market to settle and then at the end of July see if a winger shakes free from another team.

The Philadelphia Flyers haven’t moved one of their forwards and the Trevor Zegras rumors continue. There are other options for them to consider as well.

- kingcong39


There really hasn’t been a top 6 winger moved this off-season. Does Adams set the market? Doubtful.
DirtyDan
Buffalo Sabres
Location: Why aren't more people interrigent? Rike Me? , ON
Joined: 02.03.2021

Jul 6 @ 12:49 PM ET
Nah, this was a joke of a trade. You mfers related to Adams or something?

WE TRADED SAVOIE FOR EDM 4C FFS!!!

- RhinoFan


An unproven prospect who projects as a winger in the NHL.... how many do we really need?


Lunaion
Joined: 05.23.2016

Jul 6 @ 12:49 PM ET
Ostlund Krebs/Greenway and a 2025 top 10 protected 1st can get you a nice piece. But I am with you. I don’t think there’s another move to expect.
- Stripes77


I don't think they are moving away from all the prospects. Bet they think Kulich will contribute this season.

Not feeling very good about Krebs or Rosen's value. I think there's still room for Krebs at 4C and they kind of need that depth.

I don't think they've anxious to overpay again.
DirtyDan
Buffalo Sabres
Location: Why aren't more people interrigent? Rike Me? , ON
Joined: 02.03.2021

Jul 6 @ 12:50 PM ET
You didn't even like Savoie, and said he had issues that wouldn't work in the NHL.

You've gone off the deep end the other way.

Then there's also this...

>>> The hype at times was overstated on Savoie. First and foremost, his value around the league was a sign of this. Savoie was the prospect the Sabres were making available in their trade discussions. Other clubs were more interested in other prospects, including 2023 second-round pick Anton Wahlberg, but the Sabres kept coming back to Savoie as the piece.

- kingcong39



Strange.... NHL gms are valuing big fast 200 feet centermen.... baffling
Lunaion
Joined: 05.23.2016

Jul 6 @ 12:50 PM ET
Where are these bullet points coming from? Was this another Lance Q&A?
- Powerslave


I'm assuming Chad.
homiedclown
Buffalo Sabres
Location: We want 1, FL
Joined: 02.24.2008

Jul 6 @ 12:57 PM ET
It’s a tough realization to find out our prospects aren’t viewed as high as we think/hope.
- Stripes77

which means adams is really meh at drafting IMO
washedup20
Location: the little apple
Joined: 08.19.2014

Jul 6 @ 12:58 PM ET
Sabretooth9
Buffalo Sabres
Joined: 05.24.2019

Jul 6 @ 12:59 PM ET
And next year's first. That's enough to get done pretty much anything that you want to get one.
- Slump Buster


Exactly. There are no excuses for not landing a top 6 guy.

And no the hurricanes don’t have the same level of prospects we do
Sabretooth9
Buffalo Sabres
Joined: 05.24.2019

Jul 6 @ 1:00 PM ET
Ostlund Krebs/Greenway and a 2025 top 10 protected 1st can get you a nice piece. But I am with you. I don’t think there’s another move to expect.
- Stripes77


100% agree with this
Stripes77
Referee
Buffalo Sabres
Location: Where ever Matt Ellis allows me to be, NY
Joined: 07.30.2012

Jul 6 @ 1:02 PM ET
which means adams is really meh at drafting IMO
- homiedclown


Yes and no. I would say Adams biggest issue when drafting in the first round was he selected too many undersized skilled players. They all have skill, but no size. One or two is fine but all of them? Not ideal.
Buff36
Buffalo Sabres
Joined: 10.13.2019

Jul 6 @ 1:02 PM ET
Exactly. There are no excuses for not landing a top 6 guy.

And no the hurricanes don’t have the same level of prospects we do

- Sabretooth9

It is when Prospects aren't the only thing they want, that's why Winnipeg and Carolina could turn into a trade pair.
Buff36
Buffalo Sabres
Joined: 10.13.2019

Jul 6 @ 1:03 PM ET
Yes and no. I would say Adams biggest issue when drafting in the first round was he selected too many undersized skilled players. They all have skill, but no size. One or two is fine but all of them? Not ideal.
- Stripes77

One track vision
Lunaion
Joined: 05.23.2016

Jul 6 @ 1:05 PM ET
Yes and no. I would say Adams biggest issue when drafting in the first round was he selected too many undersized skilled players. They all have skill, but no size. One or two is fine but all of them? Not ideal.
- Stripes77


He learned the hard way.
Sabretooth9
Buffalo Sabres
Joined: 05.24.2019

Jul 6 @ 1:06 PM ET
which means adams is really meh at drafting IMO
- homiedclown


I don’t think it means he’s bad at drafting. It means he drafted too many of the same type of player

Savoie
Ostlund
Kulich

All extremely skilled and offensive.

Helenius - 2 way forward. Doesn’t have elite skill but still very good. But plays both ends of the ice
Stripes77
Referee
Buffalo Sabres
Location: Where ever Matt Ellis allows me to be, NY
Joined: 07.30.2012

Jul 6 @ 1:09 PM ET
I don’t think it means he’s bad at drafting. It means he drafted too many of the same type of player

Savoie
Ostlund
Kulich

All extremely skilled and offensive.

Helenius - 2 way forward. Doesn’t have elite skill but still very good. But plays both ends of the ice

- Sabretooth9


Helenius is a faster Jochen Hecht type but more skill imo.
Powerslave
Buffalo Sabres
Location: Arriving Somewhere But Not Here
Joined: 02.10.2011

Jul 6 @ 1:17 PM ET
which means adams is really meh at drafting IMO
- homiedclown



C'mon dude. It doesn't mean any of that and you know it. Every prospect in the league is just that, a prospect, until proven otherwise.

That's the prospect they were pushing and they got a deal done for what looks like a good, young, legit 3C.
Sabretooth9
Buffalo Sabres
Joined: 05.24.2019

Jul 6 @ 1:18 PM ET
It is when Prospects aren't the only thing they want, that's why Winnipeg and Carolina could turn into a trade pair.
- Buff36


Carolina doesn’t have prospects and only has necas
Page: Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131  Next