you got absolutely raked to the coals on your hockey posts today, geeez

- cunexttuesdaybro83

Oh yeah sure, because all of you ass clowns who thought we won the Cup once Panarin had signed are chiming in. Like my feelings are hurt.

Your best post was arguing about Panarin getting 124 points and the Rangers winning the Presidents trophy. You really are pathetic.

Oh yeah sure, because all of you ass clowns who thought we won the Cup once Panarin had signed are chiming in. Like my feelings are hurt.

Your best post was arguing about Panarin getting 124 points and the Rangers winning the Presidents trophy. You really are pathetic.
- Brukie

Don’t make me post the tweet again

[quote=NYR11]


So far I've been more right than wrong, keep looking, Cunexttuesdaybro83 just posts so much poop, it will take time to find, but its there

Oh yeah sure, because all of you ass clowns who thought we won the Cup once Panarin had signed are chiming in. Like my feelings are hurt.

Your best post was arguing about Panarin getting 124 points and the Rangers winning the Presidents trophy. You really are pathetic.
- Brukie

Or, you're acting like a (frank)ing lunatic and you are doubling-down on your incorrect claims when multiple people have illustrated your error?

You're always first when no one's on your side.
- Incubus 2001

Oh yeah sure, because all of you ass clowns who thought we won the Cup once Panarin had signed are chiming in. Like my feelings are hurt.

Your best post was arguing about Panarin getting 124 points and the Rangers winning the Presidents trophy. You really are pathetic.
- Brukie

Should we all flag this?

Oh yeah sure, because all of you ass clowns who thought we won the Cup once Panarin had signed are chiming in. Like my feelings are hurt.

Your best post was arguing about Panarin getting 124 points and the Rangers winning the Presidents trophy. You really are pathetic.
- Brukie

This is all you talk about. Day in and day out. You reverberate the same nonsense and never make any relevant hockey points. You throw it in our (meaning all other Ranger fans) faces that our team that we supposedly all root for hasn't won a thing in X amount of years. Everyone sees through you. You serve zero purpose to this blog other than to stir the pot with Jim and to blow Tom whenever you get the chance. I've asked you to explain what you would have done as the Rangers GM this offseason since you want to defend Goodrow.....and no response. Shocking. The only posts you make are trying to insult others or poke fun at the Rangers. It's weird.

President trophy winners, how’d they do that? I feel they let Tanner Jeannot get away, would’ve been what we needed

Ok, you've convinced me. Let's go back in time and instead of signing Panarin, we'll sign Barkov! Oh, wait a tic, that's right!!! He wasn't available at the time, was he? Oh, yeah. He was on one of the best value contracts in the league.

What the (frank) are you talking about, man???????
Do you think for one second you are typing anything about his game or Barkov's game that even one person on here isn't fully aware of?????
On top of that, you're whining about things that no one can change. Circumstances were what they were and they were dealt with in what seemed the best manner at the time. It's been years and we have improved steadily until reaching the point where we were a couple injuries/lucky bounces/better efforts/personnel changes away from the ultimate goal. Has the league changed the way it operates and no one told me? I didn't realize that every team has to release players and start from scratch every season. Why do you act like because we ONLY made it to the Conference Finals, we are done and next year we won't still be one of the better teams in the league? Seriously, I'd like an answer to that one.
- Tonybere

Cunexttuesdaybro83 was saying Barkov and Panarin had similar numbers in the playoffs before Barkov won the Cup this year. As you pointed out we know Barkovs numbers, just not Cunexttuesdaybro83. I pointed out the differences for him.

To answer your (frank)ing question, No I dont think this team, as constructed will win the Cup next year.

[quote=Brukie]

Just like you were right about Goodrow not getting claimed

"IT MAKES NO SENSE!" I believe was what you said. You were dead wrong. Shock.

This is all you talk about. Day in and day out. You reverberate the same nonsense and never make any relevant hockey points. You throw it in our (meaning all other Ranger fans) faces that our team that we supposedly all root for hasn't won a thing in X amount of years. Everyone sees through you. You serve zero purpose to this blog other than to stir the pot with Jim and to blow Tom whenever you get the chance. I've asked you to explain what you would have done as the Rangers GM this offseason since you want to defend Goodrow.....and no response. Shocking. The only posts you make are trying to insult others or poke fun at the Rangers. It's weird.
- NYR11

Post of the year congrats

This is all you talk about. Day in and day out. You reverberate the same nonsense and never make any relevant hockey points. You throw it in our (meaning all other Ranger fans) faces that our team that we supposedly all root for hasn't won a thing in X amount of years. Everyone sees through you. You serve zero purpose to this blog other than to stir the pot with Jim and to blow Tom whenever you get the chance. I've asked you to explain what you would have done as the Rangers GM this offseason since you want to defend Goodrow.....and no response. Shocking. The only posts you make are trying to insult others or poke fun at the Rangers. It's weird.
- NYR11

The problem is any point I make, you dont like so you pass over it. Just like I answered what I would do if I was the GM of the Rangers, read back and you will find it.

That NYI loser chiefs let us know about the “brave” browser the other day. DL that one and it works fine
- picklerick

Yup on brave, zero pop ups

Or, you're acting like a (frank)ing lunatic and you are doubling-down on your incorrect claims when multiple people have illustrated your error?

You're always first when no one's on your side.
- Incubus 2001
- Tonybere

Anthony, he said it. Sorry if you dont remember.

[quote=NYR11]


I did admit that I said it and??

Still makes no sense.

Post of the year congrats
- Slimtj100

Shouldn't you be thinking of some outrageous trade so we all could get a good laugh at it?

[quote=Brukie]

Well you said you were more right than wrong. I was just pointing out a time you were dead wrong.

It's easy to be right by saying the Rangers wont win the cup. 1 team out of 32 wins it every year. That gives them a 3% chance starting the season. Not all that bold of you.

This is all you talk about. Day in and day out. You reverberate the same nonsense and never make any relevant hockey points. You throw it in our (meaning all other Ranger fans) faces that our team that we supposedly all root for hasn't won a thing in X amount of years. Everyone sees through you. You serve zero purpose to this blog other than to stir the pot with Jim and to blow Tom whenever you get the chance. I've asked you to explain what you would have done as the Rangers GM this offseason since you want to defend Goodrow.....and no response. Shocking. The only posts you make are trying to insult others or poke fun at the Rangers. It's weird.
- NYR11

I dont insult others unless they come at me, like you when you just said I blow Tom. When did I insult you? I'm a pessimist, I'm sorry, I dont see things thru Rose colored glasses, you dont like my view, that's ok but Jim has been nothing but a Richard to me since as long as I can remember so I'm kinda done with him so I will post his quotes and remind him of how wrong he has been.

[quote=NYR11]

But I dont post on here as if I'm god as Cunexttuesdaybro83 does and I admit when I'm wrong.

If you are using numbers only, yes 3 percent chance league wide, but I'd say the Rangers are at least top 7 in the league right now, so that number is around 40 percent chance of winning the Cup. Not sure of the exact math though.

Shouldn't you be thinking of some outrageous trade so we all could get a good laugh at it?
- Brukie

I find it fun!!!

Ok I’m out

[quote=Brukie]

Goddamn it Brukie you broke this website with all your cry babying

[quote=Brukie]
That math is not even remotely correct. 40% chance? Lol

I dont insult others unless they come at me, like you when you just said I blow Tom. When did I insult you? I'm a pessimist, I'm sorry, I dont see things thru Rose colored glasses, you dont like my view, that's ok but Jim has been nothing but a Richard to me since as long as I can remember so I'm kinda done with him so I will post his quotes and remind him of how wrong he has been.
- Brukie

Well to be fair, you’re stalking him

[quote=Brukie]

That math is so very wrong lol.

I see a GM that’s inherited a bunch of bad contracts and no cap space to improve our team, he’s added placeholders that have no business on this team, it started when there was no cap, the Rangers always thought they could spend their way out of this while selling their future for temporary fixes. They don’t do to good at drafting, always looking for a coach that will solve the problems of the front office, this model will never succeed. The Rangers will always fill their rink, but this isn’t about fans, it’s about the advertising dollars. Dolan loves money, it’s the force that drives him to be mediocre as an owner, next year guys! It’s always next year. You have the power you just don’t realize it yet, when you stop buying their subs and stop going to games and hurt them in the pocket will things finally change. But I feel this will never happen until you prioritize your values, stop with the constant bickering and name calling, you really are weak people