VanHockeyGuy
|
|
|
Location: “Who are we to think we’re anybody?” - Tocchet. Penticton, BC Joined: 04.26.2012
|
|
|
So a top 6 C and Hog should do it. - Load Management
Uh...okay.
|
|
Load Management
Season Ticket Holder Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Billings Spit, BC Joined: 09.22.2019
|
|
|
Uh...okay. - VanHockeyGuy
Damn rights. |
|
dbot
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Auckland -Burn it all down Joined: 10.22.2008
|
|
|
Someone under team control for a couple of years like Hronek was. - VanHockeyGuy
Garland. |
|
LordHumungous
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Greetings from the Humungous. Ayatollah of rock and rolla! Joined: 08.15.2014
|
|
|
LordHumungous
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Greetings from the Humungous. Ayatollah of rock and rolla! Joined: 08.15.2014
|
|
|
Trade Hoglander - Reubenkincade
24 goals at even strength why the f uck would you do that lol?? |
|
CanuckDon
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Las Vegas Joined: 08.05.2014
|
|
|
Thanks NYN. Hoglander and Podz both suck |
|
CanuckDon
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Las Vegas Joined: 08.05.2014
|
|
|
24 goals at even strength why the fuck would you do that lol?? - LordHumungous
Because he sucks |
|
VanHockeyGuy
|
|
|
Location: “Who are we to think we’re anybody?” - Tocchet. Penticton, BC Joined: 04.26.2012
|
|
|
Because he sucks - CanuckDon
Thank you.
|
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
Someone under team control for a couple of years like Hronek was. - VanHockeyGuy
Ultimately but that’s a tough get any team would like. Costly imo if any out there. Iorio maybe? |
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
So a top 6 C and Hog should do it. - Load Management
Lol |
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
24 goals at even strength why the fuck would you do that lol?? - LordHumungous
Sell high the 1st reason 2nd is the return has to be D.. More F depth this year than last years opening roster. |
|
VanHockeyGuy
|
|
|
Location: “Who are we to think we’re anybody?” - Tocchet. Penticton, BC Joined: 04.26.2012
|
|
|
Sell high the 1st reason 2nd is the return has to be D.. More F depth this year than last years opening roster. - Nighthawk
|
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
- VanHockeyGuy
Hog has to have a good start & idk how much top 6 TOI that’ll be. He tailed off last year but has another level in him to motivate him on his next contract. All up to him. Top 6 or 4th liner is on the line imo. |
|
VanHockeyGuy
|
|
|
Location: “Who are we to think we’re anybody?” - Tocchet. Penticton, BC Joined: 04.26.2012
|
|
|
Hog has to have a good start & idk how much top 6 TOI that’ll be. He tailed off last year but has another level in him to motivate him on his next contract. All up to him. Top 6 or 4th liner is on the line imo. - Nighthawk
The price for a quality D would be much higher than Hoglander.
2 High picks +? Who knows?
What we do know is the D still needs work. |
|
LordHumungous
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Greetings from the Humungous. Ayatollah of rock and rolla! Joined: 08.15.2014
|
|
|
Sell high the 1st reason 2nd is the return has to be D.. More F depth this year than last years opening roster. - Nighthawk
Garland should go first. Hogs upside at even strength. Moving in the right direction. |
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
Garland should go first. Hogs upside at even strength. Moving in the right direction. - LordHumungous
Garland drives play too well but for the contract you’d expect it. That same cap hit would need some fancy maneuvering. Hog would need to make him expendable & he hasn’t shown enough of that yet. |
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
|
|
24 goals at even strength why the fuck would you do that lol?? - LordHumungous
Right? |
|
NewYorkNuck
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: New York, NY Joined: 07.11.2015
|
|
|
Garland drives play too well but for the contract you’d expect it. That same cap hit would need some fancy maneuvering. Hog would need to make him expendable & he hasn’t shown enough of that yet. - Nighthawk
I can see Hoglander being traded if Tocc doesn't believe he can get to the level they want him at. He's one of their best trade chips for a team looking to add someone to their roster right away. It would only happen around the TDL/later in the season, and only if they don't think he's gonna turn out well, plus other players (Sprong, Heinan) are making him more expendable. |
|
LordHumungous
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Greetings from the Humungous. Ayatollah of rock and rolla! Joined: 08.15.2014
|
|
|
Right? - ScotlandVonRickens
Pods should be worried. Lost a spot possibly. Hogs is fine. |
|
|
|
Hoglander+ for Nemec - Nighthawk
Hoglander straight up for Schneider
Rumour before was that NY wanted him. |
|
VanHockeyGuy
|
|
|
Location: “Who are we to think we’re anybody?” - Tocchet. Penticton, BC Joined: 04.26.2012
|
|
|
Hoglander straight up for Schneider
Rumour before was that NY wanted him. - Shuswap Wap
Ideally that's the kind of player you'd like to acquire.
|
|
K-man25
Calgary Flames |
|
|
Location: K town Joined: 09.02.2014
|
|
|
[quote=Shuswap Wap Willander straight up for Schneider
Rumour before was that NY wanted him.
Fixed |
|
|
|
Hoglander straight up for Schneider
Rumour before was that NY wanted him. - Shuswap Wap
|
|