Mailloux? no no, he's good offensively. have to give him that.
we didn,t see it at camp because I think he focussed on defense. but he always was a good offensive dman, big shot, right d. very similar to Bouchard.
- fidopro

not at the NHL level, I don't think so, no. agree to disagree.

not at the NHL level, I don't think so, no. agree to disagree.
- Pat1993

he played 2 games Pat.
look at his record in junior and in Laval.

he played 2 games Pat.
look at his record in junior and in Laval.
- fidopro

I know, that's why I'm saying currently. and we don't have to agree on this, it's fine lol.

I know, that's why I'm saying currently. and we don't have to agree on this, it's fine lol.
- Pat1993

that's when I know you're not AI

that's when I know you're not AI
- fidopro

- Pat1993

what's going on with the beard Marty?

true, but I still don't see Mailloux doing the same thing at this stage in his career.
- Pat1993

me neither, he still has to prove he can play in the best league in the world

the star treck guy is right, they should consider bringing back Savard with a pay cut. Dont think they would get much for him on the market at this point anyway.

me neither, he still has to prove he can play in the best league in the world

the star treck guy is right, they should consider bringing back Savard with a pay cut. Dont think they would get much for him on the market at this point anyway.
- deadpoulet

yup, agreed 100%. unless it's an offer that just can't be refused...

me neither, he still has to prove he can play in the best league in the world

the star treck guy is right, they should consider bringing back Savard with a pay cut. Dont think they would get much for him on the market at this point anyway.
- deadpoulet

Lebrun said the Oilers were interested because he wouldn't cost much.

Chris Johnston implied the Leafs were interested and willing to give up something significant.

So who knows?

Lebrun said the Oilers were interested because he wouldn't cost much.

Chris Johnston implied the Leafs were interested and willing to give up something significant.

So who knows?

- Scabeh

with Matheson and Hutson, there's no room for him in Mtl. pretty sure a team will be interested.

I'm not opposed to keeping Savard ... our right D needs all the help it can get.
Carrier was a huge improvement over Barron.

Lebrun said the Oilers were interested because he wouldn't cost much.

Chris Johnston implied the Leafs were interested and willing to give up something significant.

So who knows?

- Scabeh

I could see teams having interest but they wont get a first round pick for a guy that is a 5th or 6th defenseman at this point. Even if the plays on the pk. Will see I guess.

I'm not opposed to keeping Savard ... our right D needs all the help it can get.
Carrier was a huge improvement over Barron.
- Garfield512

I think they traded for Carrier with the knowledge they were more than likely going to trade Savard at the TDL.

So they were backfilling for that eventuality.

I could see teams having interest but they wont get a first round pick for a guy that is a 5th or 6th defenseman at this point. Even if the plays on the pk. Will see I guess.
- deadpoulet

I can see a 2nd.

with Matheson and Hutson, there's no room for him in Mtl. pretty sure a team will be interested.
- fidopro

Well you need 6 defensemen in your line up, 7 on your team. Also, you named 2 LHD.

Well you need 6 defensemen in your line up, 7 on your team. Also, you named 2 LHD.
- deadpoulet

I named 2 guys who run the PP. if Mailloux is not on the PP he is useless.

wtf??

I think they traded for Carrier with the knowledge they were more than likely going to trade Savard at the TDL.

So they were backfilling for that eventuality.
- Mashadar

They could finish the year with Struble on the third pair, but they might have to figure something out next season if they dont want to be weak on their blue line once again with too many kids and guys in the wrong chair (or wrong league).

wtf??
- pete26

you missed a good game. so date night it is

I named 2 guys who run the PP. if Mailloux is not on the PP he is useless.
- fidopro

We were talking about Savard

We were talking about Savard
- deadpoulet

you maybe, not me
but yes teams will be interested in Savard at the tdl, no doubt

wtf??
- pete26

I knew you would do this and I called you out.

Cue for you : they also play tomorow at 5pm eastern time

you maybe, not me
- fidopro

Then you are talking to yourself, nothing new I guess

Then you are talking to yourself, nothing new I guess
- deadpoulet

yeah, nothing wrong with that.
the real problem is when I start answering back