Wanna blog? Start your own hockey blog with My HockeyBuzz. Register for free today!
 
Forums :: Blog World :: Eklund: Crowdsourcing. Do you want a 10 minute 3-3 OT? And no Backsies
Author Message
powerenforcer
Chicago Blackhawks
Location: Wheeling, IL
Joined: 09.24.2009

Today @ 9:18 AM ET
No one gets a point for losing during team play.
2 points for a win, 1 point only if you lose in the shootout.
I am always surprised that so few people like shootouts. I love them. Only one game that I attended went to a shootout and it was exciting to see. On TV I love the long shootouts where they're running out of players. Love seeing both the individual skills of the shooter and the goalie's skills. Doesn't everyone like seeing penalty shots too?

- ktsparks


One change I would love the league to impliment is allowing the team the choice to get the man advantage or get a penalty shot.
coohill
Pittsburgh Penguins
Location: Louisville, CO
Joined: 03.15.2007

Today @ 9:55 AM ET
No, I want 5on5 if its more than 5min.
3 points for a regulation win
2 for an over time win
1 for an over time loss

- Tom Dusome


Yep, you should not get all the possible standings points for tying a game then winning some 3-on-3 or shootout play. Use the above system.

This puts pressure on teams to win in regulation which is really what we're after.
nyisles7
New York Islanders
Location: Wrong timing, NY
Joined: 01.20.2009

Today @ 10:32 AM ET
Not no but Hell No!
Stop with the gimmicks. Give 3 points for a win. 1 point for a tie and no points for a loss.
What other sport changes the whole dynamics of the game to get a win. 3v3 is not hockey plain and simple.
BINGO!
Carolina Hurricanes
Location: I'll always remember the last words my grandfather ever told me. He said, "A Truck!", SK
Joined: 09.21.2009

Today @ 11:31 AM ET
Not no but Hell No!
Stop with the gimmicks. Give 3 points for a win. 1 point for a tie and no points for a loss.
What other sport changes the whole dynamics of the game to get a win. 3v3 is not hockey plain and simple.

- nyisles7


Nobody wants a game to end in a tie.
nyisles7
New York Islanders
Location: Wrong timing, NY
Joined: 01.20.2009

Today @ 12:09 PM ET
Nobody wants a game to end in a tie.
- BINGO!


If both teams play well and at the end of regulation time the game is tied. I have no problem with that outcome. (So there goes your “nobody”) For me it makes much more sense then giving the loser a point and or changing the whole strategy of the game just to have a winner.
BINGO!
Carolina Hurricanes
Location: I'll always remember the last words my grandfather ever told me. He said, "A Truck!", SK
Joined: 09.21.2009

Today @ 1:14 PM ET
If both teams play well and at the end of regulation time the game is tied. I have no problem with that outcome. (So there goes your “nobody”) For me it makes much more sense then giving the loser a point and or changing the whole strategy of the game just to have a winner.
- nyisles7



It's still nobody.
Cush29
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: Who Owzzzzz da' Chiefs?, ON
Joined: 12.22.2014

Today @ 2:38 PM ET
Nobody wants a game to end in a tie.
- BINGO!


Nobody should want a team to get a point for losing.

Ties were fine from 1917 to 2004-2005 and the NHL survived.

Sven22
Detroit Red Wings
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Joined: 12.24.2007

Today @ 4:24 PM ET
Nobody wants a game to end in a tie.
- BINGO!


With a single 20 minute 3-on-3 system you'd only have about ~1 game in the entire league per year actually go scoreless that long.

Then, pick your poison. That game can end in a tie, NFL style, or you can end it in a shootout. Either way you make both outcomes extremely rare or impossible, without requiring endless regular season OT.
Page: Previous  1, 2