lol

While is dislike President Obama I don't understand why him paying someone a compliment has to be interpreted in a negative way.

While is dislike President Obama I don't understand why him paying someone a compliment has to be interpreted in a negative way.
- dt99999

i didn't see the story.

was it dopps?

i didn't see the story.

was it dopps?
- kicksave856

No.
Obama calls California attorney general to apologize for comment

http://in.reuters.com/art...ogy-idINDEE9340E320130405

No.
Obama calls California attorney general to apologize for comment

http://in.reuters.com/art...ogy-idINDEE9340E320130405
- Doppleganger

For the distraction*

i didn't see the story.

was it dopps?
- kicksave856

Basically Obama said one of his friends, who's a woman was good looking.


BASTARD!

Basically Obama said one of his friends, who's a woman was good looking.


BASTARD!
- Feeling Glucky?

impeach him.

impeach him.
- kicksave856

Also he thinks gays are people.

Also he thinks gays are people.
- Feeling Glucky?

good lord, what have we done?!

good lord, what have we done?!
- kicksave856

Get this: He's against killing civilians en-masse.

Guy's a (frank)ing joke.

Get this: He's against killing civilians en-masse.

Guy's a (frank)ing joke.
- Feeling Glucky?

and to think i just chuckled at a romney bumper sticker like last week..

and to think i just chuckled at a romney bumper sticker like last week..
- kicksave856

That man's a hero.

That man's a hero.
- Feeling Glucky?

He pumps his own gas!


















(sometimes)

Also he thinks gays are people.
- Feeling Glucky?

حيطفي النار اللي في خرئاتهم

Basically Obama said one of his friends, who's a woman was good looking.


BASTARD!
- Feeling Glucky?

I thought you worshipped the ground he walks on??


BTW, she's not "a friend" she's the California Attorney General Kamala Harris, who is quite good looking.

Get this: He's against killing civilians en-masse.

Guy's a (frank)ing joke.
- Feeling Glucky?

Well, no he's for killing en-mass, He's just not letting you know about it, and the left wing progressive media is on board with this, and don't report it either.

http://www.policymic.com/...wants-to-up-drone-warfare
Despite claims from the administration that drone strikes have killed very few civilians, multiple independent reports confirm that Obama is severely downplaying the wreckage that these drone strikes inflict. It is ultimately impossible to get exact numbers, but a new study from Columbia Law School’s Human Rights Institute finds that the number of Pakistani civilians killed in drone strikes are “significantly and consistently underestimated” by tracking organizations which are trying to take the place of government estimates on casualties.

http://www.cnn.com/2012/0...pakistan-us-drone-strikes

(CNN) -- U.S. drone strikes in Pakistan have killed far more people than the United States has acknowledged, have traumatized innocent residents and largely been ineffective, according to a new study released Tuesday.

The study by Stanford Law School and New York University's School of Law calls for a re-evaluation of the practice, saying the number of "high-level" targets killed as a percentage of total casualties is extremely low -- about 2%.

The report accuses Washington of misrepresenting drone strikes as "a surgically precise and effective tool that makes the U.S. safer," saying that in reality, "there is significant evidence that U.S. drone strikes have injured and killed civilians."

Well, no he's for killing en-mass, He's just not letting you know about it, and the left wing progressive media is on board with this, and don't report it either.

http://www.policymic.com/...wants-to-up-drone-warfare
Despite claims from the administration that drone strikes have killed very few civilians, multiple independent reports confirm that Obama is severely downplaying the wreckage that these drone strikes inflict. It is ultimately impossible to get exact numbers, but a new study from Columbia Law School’s Human Rights Institute finds that the number of Pakistani civilians killed in drone strikes are “significantly and consistently underestimated” by tracking organizations which are trying to take the place of government estimates on casualties.

http://www.cnn.com/2012/0...pakistan-us-drone-strikes

(CNN) -- U.S. drone strikes in Pakistan have killed far more people than the United States has acknowledged, have traumatized innocent residents and largely been ineffective, according to a new study released Tuesday.

The study by Stanford Law School and New York University's School of Law calls for a re-evaluation of the practice, saying the number of "high-level" targets killed as a percentage of total casualties is extremely low -- about 2%.

The report accuses Washington of misrepresenting drone strikes as "a surgically precise and effective tool that makes the U.S. safer," saying that in reality, "there is significant evidence that U.S. drone strikes have injured and killed civilians."


- Doppleganger

Dop, I gave you your thread back, please keep this boring poop off this thread.

Dop, I gave you your thread back, please keep this boring poop off this thread.
- nfph

Clearly you are part of the conspiracy of silence

Dop, I gave you your thread back, please keep this boring poop off this thread.
- nfph

ya stick to subjectifying women and dellio like the rest of us

ya stick to subjectifying women and dellio like the rest of us
- the_cause2000

Objectifying?

Objectifying?
- nfph

ass

ass
- the_cause2000

- Mike Komisarek