Wanna blog? Start your own hockey blog with My HockeyBuzz. Register for free today!
 
Forums :: Misc. Lounge :: Things You Like 3
Author Message
kicksave856
Philadelphia Flyers
Location: i love how not saying dumb things on the internet was never an option.
Joined: 09.29.2005
Dec 16 @ 8:53 AM ET
They deserve each other.
- dt99999

you shut your mouth.
dt99999
Montreal Canadiens
Location: wow, hope that's sarcasim
Joined: 11.18.2008
Dec 16 @ 8:54 AM ET
you shut your mouth.
- kicksave856



on some chips?

for sure!
kicksave856
Philadelphia Flyers
Location: i love how not saying dumb things on the internet was never an option.
Joined: 09.29.2005
Dec 16 @ 8:54 AM ET
chips
- dt99999

OMG! you are such a bastard right now!
kicksave856
Philadelphia Flyers
Location: i love how not saying dumb things on the internet was never an option.
Joined: 09.29.2005
Dec 16 @ 8:55 AM ET
on some chips?

for sure!
- dt99999

you have to go back to bed right now and then get up on the other side.
Mike Komisarek
Location: we all appreciate and value the touch of class you bring to this site, mike.
Joined: 02.14.2007
Dec 16 @ 8:56 AM ET
you shut your mouth.
- kicksave856
dt99999
Montreal Canadiens
Location: wow, hope that's sarcasim
Joined: 11.18.2008
Dec 16 @ 9:03 AM ET
Hey Guys,

Can we get the attention of the higher powers here? I have a suggestion regarding the Rating system. Currently it sucks, we need more depth, there are way too many women on this site getting beautiful ratings. Now of course many of you may think that they have beautiful feet and thats fine but there are many I believe who simply use the 5 star because they like the feet and they believe they are better than 4 stars which = (Nice). We need a deeper system. Often I find myself in a dilemma when rating feet. For example -

Selena Gomez vs Bella Thorne. Now although I do find both to have beautiful feet I would like to give the edge to one or the other and with the current system I cannot, because both have better than nice feet. See the problem?

I'd like to ask for a 1-10 rating system with .5 numbers included as well adding even more depth when it comes to differentiating the quality of the feet.

Bella Thorne 9.
Selena Gomez 8.5

As you an see I can now give proper ratings based on who I think deserves the better rating, rather than just giving the 5 to both. Here are the number definitions..

1 - Ugly, 2 - Really Bad, 3 - Bad, 4 - Below average, 5 - Average,
6 - Above average, 7 - Good, 8 - Really Good, 9 - Great, 10 - Gorgeous/Elite

Now of course with the .5 system you can also get in between these definitions and be more precise with your ratings.

What do you think guys & girls? Would you like to see a better deeper rating system?
Mike Komisarek
Location: we all appreciate and value the touch of class you bring to this site, mike.
Joined: 02.14.2007
Dec 16 @ 9:31 AM ET
Hey Guys,

Can we get the attention of the higher powers here? I have a suggestion regarding the Rating system. Currently it sucks, we need more depth, there are way too many women on this site getting beautiful ratings. Now of course many of you may think that they have beautiful feet and thats fine but there are many I believe who simply use the 5 star because they like the feet and they believe they are better than 4 stars which = (Nice). We need a deeper system. Often I find myself in a dilemma when rating feet. For example -

Selena Gomez vs Bella Thorne. Now although I do find both to have beautiful feet I would like to give the edge to one or the other and with the current system I cannot, because both have better than nice feet. See the problem?

I'd like to ask for a 1-10 rating system with .5 numbers included as well adding even more depth when it comes to differentiating the quality of the feet.

Bella Thorne 9.
Selena Gomez 8.5

As you an see I can now give proper ratings based on who I think deserves the better rating, rather than just giving the 5 to both. Here are the number definitions..

1 - Ugly, 2 - Really Bad, 3 - Bad, 4 - Below average, 5 - Average,
6 - Above average, 7 - Good, 8 - Really Good, 9 - Great, 10 - Gorgeous/Elite

Now of course with the .5 system you can also get in between these definitions and be more precise with your ratings.

What do you think guys & girls? Would you like to see a better deeper rating system?
- dt99999


We just want to see more sluts on this (frank)ing site, sir.

(frank) the ratings.
Streit2ThePoint
Seattle Kraken
Location: it's disgusting how good you are at hockeybuzz.
Joined: 09.20.2013
Dec 16 @ 9:38 AM ET

- Mike Komisarek
Streit2ThePoint
Seattle Kraken
Location: it's disgusting how good you are at hockeybuzz.
Joined: 09.20.2013
Dec 16 @ 9:40 AM ET
Hey Guys,

Can we get the attention of the higher powers here? I have a suggestion regarding the Rating system. Currently it sucks, we need more depth, there are way too many women on this site getting beautiful ratings. Now of course many of you may think that they have beautiful feet and thats fine but there are many I believe who simply use the 5 star because they like the feet and they believe they are better than 4 stars which = (Nice). We need a deeper system. Often I find myself in a dilemma when rating feet. For example -

Selena Gomez vs Bella Thorne. Now although I do find both to have beautiful feet I would like to give the edge to one or the other and with the current system I cannot, because both have better than nice feet. See the problem?

I'd like to ask for a 1-10 rating system with .5 numbers included as well adding even more depth when it comes to differentiating the quality of the feet.

Bella Thorne 9.
Selena Gomez 8.5

As you an see I can now give proper ratings based on who I think deserves the better rating, rather than just giving the 5 to both. Here are the number definitions..

1 - Ugly, 2 - Really Bad, 3 - Bad, 4 - Below average, 5 - Average,
6 - Above average, 7 - Good, 8 - Really Good, 9 - Great, 10 - Gorgeous/Elite

Now of course with the .5 system you can also get in between these definitions and be more precise with your ratings.

What do you think guys & girls? Would you like to see a better deeper rating system?
- dt99999


Love going deeper
kicksave856
Philadelphia Flyers
Location: i love how not saying dumb things on the internet was never an option.
Joined: 09.29.2005
Dec 16 @ 9:48 AM ET

- Streit2ThePoint

please don't encourage this type of behavior.
Streit2ThePoint
Seattle Kraken
Location: it's disgusting how good you are at hockeybuzz.
Joined: 09.20.2013
Dec 16 @ 10:25 AM ET
please don't encourage this type of behavior.
- kicksave856


That usage of a gif deserved two laughy emoticons, sir.
Crimsoninja
Philadelphia Flyers
Location: Dude, I am so sorry about whatever made you like this. Take it easy.
Joined: 07.06.2007
Dec 16 @ 10:29 AM ET
Hey Guys,

Can we get the attention of the higher powers here? I have a suggestion regarding the Rating system. Currently it sucks, we need more depth, there are way too many women on this site getting beautiful ratings. Now of course many of you may think that they have beautiful feet and thats fine but there are many I believe who simply use the 5 star because they like the feet and they believe they are better than 4 stars which = (Nice). We need a deeper system. Often I find myself in a dilemma when rating feet. For example -

Selena Gomez vs Bella Thorne. Now although I do find both to have beautiful feet I would like to give the edge to one or the other and with the current system I cannot, because both have better than nice feet. See the problem?

I'd like to ask for a 1-10 rating system with .5 numbers included as well adding even more depth when it comes to differentiating the quality of the feet.

Bella Thorne 9.
Selena Gomez 8.5

As you an see I can now give proper ratings based on who I think deserves the better rating, rather than just giving the 5 to both. Here are the number definitions..

1 - Ugly, 2 - Really Bad, 3 - Bad, 4 - Below average, 5 - Average,
6 - Above average, 7 - Good, 8 - Really Good, 9 - Great, 10 - Gorgeous/Elite

Now of course with the .5 system you can also get in between these definitions and be more precise with your ratings.

What do you think guys & girls? Would you like to see a better deeper rating system?
- dt99999

i will never understand you feet freaks
Crimsoninja
Philadelphia Flyers
Location: Dude, I am so sorry about whatever made you like this. Take it easy.
Joined: 07.06.2007
Dec 16 @ 10:38 AM ET
wienerheads attempting to post star wars spoilers on reddit to the point of PMing spoilers to anyone who complains about spoilers
daeth
Colorado Avalanche
Location: 43 points, ON
Joined: 09.15.2005
Dec 16 @ 10:42 AM ET
wienerheads attempting to post star wars spoilers on reddit to the point of PMing spoilers to anyone who complains about spoilers
- Crimsoninja

i'd rather watch it at home and not have to endure popcorn farts and everyone laughing at everything that isn't funny but it's poop like that that'll get me into the theatre. for sure some bumhole will ruin it for me if i don't.
twiztedmike
Toronto Maple Leafs
Joined: 10.06.2007
Dec 16 @ 11:05 AM ET
wienerheads attempting to post star wars spoilers on reddit to the point of PMing spoilers to anyone who complains about spoilers
- Crimsoninja

haha u love weiners
Feeling Glucky?
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: Tanktown, ON
Joined: 10.08.2008
Dec 16 @ 11:37 AM ET
i'd rather watch it at home and not have to endure popcorn farts and everyone laughing at everything that isn't funny but it's poop like that that'll get me into the theatre. for sure some bumhole will ruin it for me if i don't.
- daeth
daeth
Colorado Avalanche
Location: 43 points, ON
Joined: 09.15.2005
Dec 16 @ 11:54 AM ET

- Feeling Glucky?

exactly

people love doing that with mega popular things like this. i'd normally have no problem waiting a year for it to come out on blu ray but i can't really risk it with this.
watsonnostaw
Atlanta Thrashers
Location: Dude has all the personality of a lump of concrete. Just a complete lizard.
Joined: 06.26.2006
Dec 16 @ 2:25 PM ET
Trump has no idea what America's Nuclear Triad is
watsonnostaw
Atlanta Thrashers
Location: Dude has all the personality of a lump of concrete. Just a complete lizard.
Joined: 06.26.2006
Dec 16 @ 4:26 PM ET
Mistrial declared in trial of Officer William Porter in death of Freddie Gray
dt99999
Montreal Canadiens
Location: wow, hope that's sarcasim
Joined: 11.18.2008
Dec 16 @ 4:34 PM ET
Mistrial declared in trial of Officer William Porter in death of Freddie Gray
- watsonnostaw

Nice knowing you Baltimore
twiztedmike
Toronto Maple Leafs
Joined: 10.06.2007
Dec 16 @ 4:36 PM ET
Trump has no idea what America's Nuclear Triad is
- watsonnostaw

Me neither which automatically makes me the best GOP candidate
Shutdown
Carolina Hurricanes
Location: a fat guy sitting on a toilet with no back and his head resting on his balls pic, NC
Joined: 04.06.2008
Dec 16 @ 5:26 PM ET
Nice knowing you Baltimore
- dt99999

bye desi
watsonnostaw
Atlanta Thrashers
Location: Dude has all the personality of a lump of concrete. Just a complete lizard.
Joined: 06.26.2006
Dec 16 @ 5:31 PM ET
chips
- dt99999
Feeling Glucky?
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: Tanktown, ON
Joined: 10.08.2008
Dec 16 @ 5:34 PM ET
Me neither which automatically makes me the best GOP candidate
- twiztedmike

It's the combination of nuclear weapons in the submarine fleet, the air force, and in hardened launch sites.

Makes it so that no matter what you do to the states, there's still a way for them to (frank) your poop up with nukes. Submarine fleet alone can leave the planet inhospitable... and the location of those submarines is confidential.

Then you've got the crazy ICBMs, that can carry multiple warheads each, with the ability to deploy them against different targets... which are guarded by security so tight that a pizza delivery guy got inside one to wake up the (lone) guard who had ordered a pizza.

And then you have the old-as-poop b52s that have been known to break apart mid flight and drop nukes in populated areas.
twiztedmike
Toronto Maple Leafs
Joined: 10.06.2007
Dec 16 @ 5:52 PM ET
It's the combination of nuclear weapons in the submarine fleet, the air force, and in hardened launch sites.

Makes it so that no matter what you do to the states, there's still a way for them to (frank) your poop up with nukes. Submarine fleet alone can leave the planet inhospitable... and the location of those submarines is confidential.

Then you've got the crazy ICBMs, that can carry multiple warheads each, with the ability to deploy them against different targets... which are guarded by security so tight that a pizza delivery guy got inside one to wake up the (lone) guard who had ordered a pizza.

And then you have the old-as-poop b52s that have been known to break apart mid flight and drop nukes in populated areas.
- Feeling Glucky?

This has been highly informative - TY sir
Page: Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157, 158, 159, 160, 161, 162, 163, 164, 165, 166, 167, 168, 169, 170, 171, 172, 173, 174, 175, 176, 177, 178, 179, 180, 181, 182, 183, 184, 185, 186, 187, 188, 189, 190, 191, 192, 193, 194, 195, 196, 197, 198, 199, 200, 201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208, 209, 210, 211, 212, 213, 214, 215, 216, 217, 218, 219, 220, 221, 222, 223, 224, 225, 226, 227, 228, 229, 230, 231, 232, 233, 234, 235, 236, 237, 238, 239, 240, 241, 242, 243, 244, 245, 246, 247, 248, 249, 250, 251, 252, 253, 254, 255, 256, 257, 258, 259, 260, 261, 262, 263, 264, 265, 266, 267, 268, 269, 270, 271, 272, 273, 274, 275, 276, 277, 278, 279, 280, 281, 282, 283, 284, 285, 286, 287, 288, 289, 290, 291, 292, 293, 294, 295, 296, 297, 298, 299, 300, 301, 302, 303, 304, 305, 306, 307, 308, 309, 310, 311, 312, 313, 314, 315, 316, 317, 318, 319, 320, 321, 322, 323, 324, 325, 326, 327, 328, 329, 330, 331, 332, 333, 334, 335, 336, 337, 338, 339, 340, 341, 342, 343, 344, 345, 346, 347, 348, 349, 350, 351, 352, 353, 354, 355, 356, 357, 358, 359, 360, 361, 362, 363, 364, 365, 366, 367, 368, 369, 370, 371, 372, 373, 374, 375, 376, 377, 378, 379, 380, 381, 382, 383, 384, 385, 386, 387, 388, 389, 390, 391, 392, 393, 394, 395, 396, 397, 398, 399, 400, 401, 402, 403, 404, 405, 406, 407, 408, 409, 410, 411, 412, 413, 414, 415, 416, 417, 418, 419, 420, 421, 422, 423, 424, 425, 426, 427, 428, 429, 430, 431, 432, 433, 434, 435, 436, 437, 438, 439, 440, 441, 442, 443, 444, 445, 446, 447, 448, 449, 450, 451, 452, 453, 454, 455, 456, 457, 458, 459, 460, 461, 462, 463, 464, 465, 466, 467, 468, 469, 470, 471, 472, 473, 474, 475, 476, 477, 478, 479, 480, 481, 482, 483, 484, 485, 486, 487, 488, 489, 490, 491, 492, 493, 494, 495, 496, 497, 498, 499, 500, 501, 502, 503, 504, 505, 506, 507, 508, 509, 510, 511, 512, 513, 514, 515, 516, 517, 518, 519, 520, 521, 522, 523, 524, 525, 526, 527, 528, 529, 530, 531, 532, 533, 534, 535, 536, 537, 538, 539, 540, 541, 542, 543, 544, 545, 546, 547, 548, 549, 550, 551, 552, 553, 554, 555, 556, 557, 558, 559, 560, 561, 562, 563, 564, 565, 566, 567, 568, 569, 570, 571, 572, 573, 574, 575, 576, 577, 578, 579, 580, 581, 582, 583, 584, 585, 586, 587, 588, 589, 590, 591, 592, 593, 594, 595, 596, 597, 598, 599, 600, 601, 602, 603, 604, 605, 606, 607, 608, 609, 610, 611, 612, 613, 614, 615, 616, 617, 618, 619, 620, 621, 622, 623, 624, 625, 626, 627, 628, 629, 630, 631, 632, 633, 634, 635, 636, 637, 638, 639, 640, 641, 642, 643, 644, 645, 646, 647, 648, 649, 650, 651, 652, 653, 654, 655, 656, 657, 658, 659, 660, 661, 662, 663, 664, 665, 666, 667, 668, 669, 670, 671, 672, 673, 674, 675, 676, 677, 678, 679, 680, 681, 682, 683, 684, 685, 686, 687, 688, 689, 690, 691, 692, 693, 694, 695, 696, 697, 698, 699, 700, 701, 702, 703, 704, 705, 706, 707, 708, 709, 710, 711, 712, 713, 714, 715, 716, 717, 718, 719, 720, 721, 722, 723, 724, 725, 726, 727, 728, 729, 730, 731, 732, 733, 734, 735, 736, 737, 738, 739, 740, 741, 742, 743, 744, 745, 746, 747, 748, 749, 750, 751, 752, 753, 754, 755, 756, 757, 758, 759, 760, 761, 762, 763, 764, 765, 766, 767, 768, 769, 770, 771, 772, 773, 774, 775, 776, 777, 778, 779, 780, 781, 782, 783, 784, 785, 786, 787, 788, 789, 790, 791, 792, 793, 794, 795, 796, 797, 798, 799, 800, 801, 802, 803, 804, 805, 806, 807, 808, 809, 810, 811, 812, 813, 814, 815, 816, 817, 818, 819, 820, 821, 822, 823, 824, 825, 826, 827, 828, 829, 830, 831, 832, 833, 834, 835, 836, 837, 838, 839, 840, 841, 842, 843, 844, 845, 846, 847, 848, 849, 850, 851, 852, 853, 854, 855, 856, 857, 858, 859, 860, 861, 862, 863, 864, 865, 866, 867, 868, 869, 870, 871, 872, 873, 874, 875, 876, 877, 878, 879, 880, 881, 882, 883, 884, 885, 886, 887, 888, 889, 890, 891, 892, 893, 894, 895, 896, 897, 898, 899, 900, 901, 902, 903, 904, 905, 906, 907, 908, 909, 910, 911, 912, 913, 914, 915, 916, 917, 918, 919, 920, 921, 922, 923, 924, 925, 926, 927, 928, 929, 930, 931, 932, 933, 934, 935, 936, 937, 938, 939, 940, 941, 942, 943, 944, 945, 946, 947, 948, 949, 950, 951, 952, 953, 954, 955, 956, 957, 958, 959, 960, 961, 962, 963, 964, 965, 966, 967, 968, 969, 970, 971, 972, 973, 974, 975, 976, 977, 978, 979, 980, 981, 982, 983, 984, 985, 986, 987, 988, 989, 990, 991, 992, 993, 994, 995, 996, 997, 998, 999, 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 1010, 1011, 1012, 1013, 1014, 1015, 1016, 1017, 1018, 1019, 1020, 1021, 1022, 1023, 1024, 1025, 1026, 1027, 1028, 1029, 1030, 1031, 1032, 1033, 1034, 1035, 1036, 1037, 1038, 1039, 1040, 1041, 1042, 1043, 1044, 1045, 1046, 1047, 1048, 1049, 1050, 1051, 1052, 1053, 1054, 1055, 1056, 1057, 1058, 1059, 1060, 1061, 1062, 1063, 1064, 1065, 1066, 1067, 1068, 1069, 1070, 1071, 1072, 1073, 1074, 1075, 1076, 1077, 1078, 1079, 1080, 1081, 1082, 1083, 1084, 1085, 1086, 1087, 1088, 1089, 1090, 1091, 1092, 1093, 1094, 1095, 1096, 1097, 1098, 1099, 1100, 1101, 1102, 1103, 1104, 1105, 1106, 1107, 1108, 1109, 1110, 1111, 1112, 1113, 1114, 1115, 1116, 1117, 1118, 1119, 1120, 1121, 1122, 1123, 1124, 1125, 1126, 1127, 1128, 1129, 1130, 1131, 1132, 1133, 1134, 1135, 1136, 1137, 1138, 1139, 1140, 1141, 1142, 1143, 1144, 1145, 1146, 1147, 1148, 1149, 1150, 1151, 1152, 1153, 1154, 1155, 1156, 1157, 1158, 1159, 1160, 1161, 1162, 1163  Next