Flyskippy
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Location: Ignoreland, GA Joined: 11.04.2005
|
|
|
eayost
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Location: Into the Void, PA Joined: 04.14.2010
|
|
|
In any event, let's get a PP goal here and tighten up the rest of the game. Two in a row without Mez and Kimmo would be pretty amazing |
|
FlyerGuy
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
Location: PA Joined: 06.18.2007
|
|
|
come on, boys ... give me a goal here. |
|
Flyskippy
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Location: Ignoreland, GA Joined: 11.04.2005
|
|
|
come on, boys ... give us a goal here. - FlyerGuy
Fixed. |
|
bigmookalookie
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
Location: Mookie you are a wing nut, In , LS Joined: 02.27.2011
|
|
|
Pfft. He hasn't played as long as rockychocbill.
- Flyskippy
|
|
rockychocbill
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Location: The Off Season Joined: 07.04.2008
|
|
|
Are you kidding me? You need to look at the replay again. Jake's head is nowhere near that low. Kronwall is shorter than Jake, and standing almost upright when he hits him and his shoulder hit him in the face. Watch it again. You're dead wrong with this. - BringBack25
If Kronwall's shorter, which he is, then one of two things had to happen for Kronwall's shoulder to hit Jake in the visor. Either Kronwall jumped up, or Jake was leaning forward and down. What did you see? I know what I saw. |
|
rockychocbill
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Location: The Off Season Joined: 07.04.2008
|
|
|
Pfft. He hasn't played as long as rockychocbill.
- Flyskippy
Still a clean hit. |
|
MBFlyerfan
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Location: Be nice from now on, NJ Joined: 03.17.2006
|
|
|
Giroux needs to stop doing that. Dazzling move as Jackson calls it. Sure, a dazzling move that ends up a turnover at the blue line.
Come on Klode.
|
|
Lexington Flyer
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Location: NoHockeyTown , KY Joined: 04.02.2008
|
|
|
Power play is pathetic. |
|
flyerscup2011
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Location: Future lottery winner Joined: 06.21.2010
|
|
|
i'm sorry, but i can't see how any knowledgeable hockey fan, in particular a flyers fan could think that hit by kronwall was clean. it was a cheap shot as he used trickery to lure his opponent into a vulnerable position, lined him up and to me it looked like his elbow followed through voracek's head. how is this type of play exactly what the nhl has been trying to rid itself of? |
|
hammarby31
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Location: it's been 84 years, AZ Joined: 01.02.2007
|
|
|
2 stunning powerplays tonight. stunning. |
|
FlyerGuy
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
Location: PA Joined: 06.18.2007
|
|
|
#48 with an ENG.
|
|
Giroux_Is_God
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Location: CLASS DISMISSED Joined: 12.15.2011
|
|
|
Giroux needs to stop doing that. Dazzling move as Jackson calls it. Sure, a dazzling move that ends up a turnover at the blue line.
Come on Klode. - MBFlyerfan
Yup- beat the first guy, then tried to pull a Jagr.
Just gain the red line, send it in, and then hit everything in white. |
|
Flyskippy
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Location: Ignoreland, GA Joined: 11.04.2005
|
|
|
i'm sorry, but i can't see how any knowledgeable hockey fan, in particular a flyers fan could think that hit by kronwall was clean. it was a cheap shot as he used trickery to lure his opponent into a vulnerable position, lined him up and to me it looked like his elbow followed through voracek's head. how is this type of play exactly what the nhl has been trying to rid itself of? - flyerscup2011
Oh boy |
|
hammarby31
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Location: it's been 84 years, AZ Joined: 01.02.2007
|
|
|
Giroux needs to stop doing that. Dazzling move as Jackson calls it. Sure, a dazzling move that ends up a turnover at the blue line.
Come on Klode. - MBFlyerfan
agreed. just go wide, and get it deep. |
|
Duran76
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Location: Calmer than you are dude, PA Joined: 07.25.2010
|
|
|
Who gets the EN? Simmonds? |
|
MBFlyerfan
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Location: Be nice from now on, NJ Joined: 03.17.2006
|
|
|
If Kronwall's shorter, which he is, then one of two things had to happen for Kronwall's shoulder to hit Jake in the visor. Either Kronwall jumped up, or Jake was leaning forward and down. What did you see? I know what I saw. - rockychocbill
|
|
Duran76
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Location: Calmer than you are dude, PA Joined: 07.25.2010
|
|
|
hammarby31
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Location: it's been 84 years, AZ Joined: 01.02.2007
|
|
|
BRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRYYYYYYYYYYYYYYZ |
|
rockychocbill
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Location: The Off Season Joined: 07.04.2008
|
|
|
Looks like his head is up? He's certainly leaning forward because he is skating... his head being down effected his ability to see Kronwall well before the hit, but it doesn't really effect the point of contact. That's what I see anyways. - eayost
He did raise it up at the last split second. Just soon enough to absorb the brunt of it with his visor. If he wasn't wearing a visor he'd have a broken nose. The ice would have been red. |
|
FlyerGuy
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
Location: PA Joined: 06.18.2007
|
|
|
Bryz!
|
|
Flyskippy
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Location: Ignoreland, GA Joined: 11.04.2005
|
|
|
HumONgous Beeg save dere! |
|
Giroux_Is_God
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Location: CLASS DISMISSED Joined: 12.15.2011
|
|
|
FlyerGuy
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
Location: PA Joined: 06.18.2007
|
|
|
Who gets the EN? Simmonds? - Duran76
Mr. Scoring Drought. |
|
BringBack25
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Location: deep lurk Joined: 01.03.2007
|
|
|
If Kronwall's shorter, which he is, then one of two things had to happen for Kronwall's shoulder to hit Jake in the visor. Either Kronwall jumped up, or Jake was leaning forward and down. What did you see? I know what I saw. - rockychocbill
My point was in rebuttal to the claim that ANY hit would have contacted Voracek in the head because it was Soooo low. It wasn't that low. A hip check, or simply dropping his own shoulder a little would have avoided the hit. That's what the video, and your still shots show. There is clearly room for Kronwall to have picked another spot to hit him. He didn't HAVE to hit him in the head.
And with that I'm done on this subject. Moving on.... |
|