Eklund: So Who Wants Him?
- Eklund

Nash for Luongo ++

No thanks....overpayment IMO....Canucks are not in the drivers seat on this one so I don't think it would take Kessel...but the $$$ would fit with the Cap implications
- JIMI-JAMES

Wait until July first, prepare the offer in the meantime, then offer sheet Schneider they day of the 1st for 4 million per year for 2-3 years...Over paying, yes, but if the Canucks don't match, all we give up is a 2013 1st rounder, and a 3rd.

They won't need to trade Kessel or Lupul IMO. Trade us Schenn and Kulemin and we'll give you Luongo and Raymond or something like that. Adjust accordingly with picks if I'm being a homer.
- nucks_94

pass.

Nash for Luongo ++
- Alexzanki

That makes zero sense.

"NJ. Yes, NJ. i talked to a source at length yesterday about this. you heard it here first."

No I didn't. I read about it yesterday in multiple locations. Here is just one:

http://www.vancouversun.c...luongo/6508190/story.html
- isles10289

ok! sorry bout that. I will correct.

Would be a pretty sick line, but Kessel is not going anywhere (until he is UFA )

Seriously, Lupul's value will never be higher... trade him and get your #1 goalie for the next 7-10 years....

Then pick Galychuk (no idea how to spell it)...
- riceroni

If the cost for Lou is Lupul ...pass

It starts with Van taking one of Komi, Connolly, Army or Lombo...and then add in what you think it takes

Why would Washington look at Luongo when they have Neuvirth and Holtby?
- nhindian

They wont...

If the cost for Lou is Lupul ...pass

It starts with Van taking one of Komi, Connolly, Army or Lombo...and then add in what you think it takes
- senstroll

Here here.....

Luongo will be a Capital and Wash will include either Avs 1st or their own 1st to get him....his $$$ will replace Semin's $$$.....if Brodeur retires, NJ will def be in play...maybe Parise's right's?....best case scenario for Gillis is trade Lou to the eastern conference and NOT to the Leafs....

I don't understand how you don't understand.
- burn

It's worse than the Leaf thread in here.

Here here.....
- burn

I believe that would be, "hear, hear."

No thanks....overpayment IMO....Canucks are not in the drivers seat on this one so I don't think it would take Kessel...but the $$$ would fit with the Cap implications
- JIMI-JAMES

There are about 10 teams looking for a top notch goalie this season. There are about 7 decent goalies available .Sellers are in the driver seat.

Fleury + Martin for Luongo
- brianb0422

That's not bad but "Couver" wins that trade since MAF is better than Lu.

People seem to forget about the Halak trade. Remember that? When everyone was ready to give up on Price, and Halak was a God, only to get traded away in the off season?

Schnider has proven nothing yet. He has proven to be a good back up.

Want to hinge your hopes and dreams on a kid that could be the next Toskola????????

Have fun with that.

My point is maybe Lou isn't even being thought about, when it comes to which goalie they trade.

Something I thought would be interesting is:

Kessel

for

Luongo + ?

Sedin-Sedin-Kessel

Could you imagine that line?
- mfreedman

That line would be softer than wet cardboard.

Nash for Luongo ++
- Alexzanki

I think it will be Luongo and Raymond for Nash.

That's not bad but "Couver" wins that trade since MAF is better than Lu.
- LamontSanford

But they lose because Paul Martin is a cancer with his $5 mil locked in for 4 years.

Komisarek for Luongo

Lupul for Crosby

Lombardi for Malkin

Kadri for Giroux

Schenn for Stamkos

Done...

I think it will be Luongo and Raymond for Nash.
- VANTEL

Bobby Lou would never EVAH go to CLB.

Komisarek for Luongo

Lupul for Crosby

Lombardi for Malkin

Kadri for Giroux

Schenn for Stamkos

Done...
- Tee-Dot

Put the Lucky down.

Komisarek for Luongo

Lupul for Crosby

Lombardi for Malkin

Kadri for Giroux

Schenn for Stamkos

Done...
- Tee-Dot

Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaand......our 5th overall for RICHARD PARK!!

I think it will be Luongo and Raymond for Nash.
- VANTEL

I think it'll take a lot more than that IMO.

Luongo, Booth, Tanev and a 1st would be the asking price from Columbus i think

In my opinion it would be a mistake trading Luongo instead of Schneider. This is a guy that won 15 playoff games last year, and they would trade him instead of the guy that has 1 playoff victory and is 0-11 in O.T. playoff games in his professional career (NHL & AHL)? Also add to the fact that Schneider was 27-7 against non-playoff teams in 2 seasons, but only 10-7-3 against playoff teams.
Also add to the fact that they pretty much killed Luongo's market value by having him sit on the bench the last 3 games of the series. Luongo was not the problem this series, it was Kesler, Burrows, Edler, Raymond, Higgins, Lapierre, Bieksa, & Booth. All no shows. A couple of those 8 is who they should be looking to move.

In my opinion it would be a mistake trading Luongo instead of Schneider. This is a guy that won 15 playoff games last year, and they would trade him instead of the guy that has 1 playoff victory and is 0-11 in O.T. playoff games in his professional career (NHL & AHL)? Also add to the fact that Schneider was 27-7 against non-playoff teams in 2 seasons, but only 10-7-3 against playoff teams.
Also add to the fact that they pretty much killed Luongo's market value by having him sit on the bench the last 3 games of the series. Luongo was not the problem this series, it was Kesler, Burrows, Edler, Raymond, Higgins, Lapierre, Bieksa, & Booth. All no shows. A couple of those 8 is who they should be looking to move.
- scootty

Agreed...Canucks playoff exit this year had nothing to do with Luongo

i would think he wouldnt want to stay with a canadian team...didnt his wife not want to move to vancouver (i could be totally wrong there)...i dont know why she would want to go to any other canadian market...my guess is he goes somewhere like Tampa...