jaymster790
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: Elsewhere, QC Joined: 03.16.2009
|
|
|
trust me. this one is not like that and it is totally hockey related. - Habssuperfan77
I can confirm this. |
|
Habssuperfan77
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: Brain Tumor survivor...wish they would have at least provide me with a brain after the surgery. : ( Joined: 07.26.2007
|
|
|
Hopefully he took them between the periods - Fredobface
Gives new meaning to time Log!!
|
|
number_23
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: Euuuuh, un porc-épic? Joined: 10.15.2008
|
|
|
I can confirm this. - jaymster790
and I can confirm that there's nothing worth seeing using that link.
EDIT: upon further review... |
|
jaymster790
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: Elsewhere, QC Joined: 03.16.2009
|
|
|
and I can confirm that there's nothing worth seeing using that link.
EDIT: upon further review... - number_23
If your avatar was covered in poop it represent you better.
Edit: Sorry, had to post it. |
|
Habssuperfan77
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: Brain Tumor survivor...wish they would have at least provide me with a brain after the surgery. : ( Joined: 07.26.2007
|
|
|
and I can confirm that there's nothing worth seeing using that link.
EDIT: upon further review... - number_23
|
|
_nay_
Boston Bruins |
|
|
Location: "aaaargh my leg!!!" -Max Pacioretty Joined: 04.06.2011
|
|
|
If your avatar was covered in poop it represent you better.
Edit: Sorry, had to post it. - jaymster790
I still haven't clicked (and won't), but are you talking about Symba or sodomy? |
|
Symba007
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: No, ON Joined: 02.26.2007
|
|
|
Is CBB's name James Leopold? |
|
Fan2
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Joined: 02.27.2009
|
|
|
The image I get when I hear Gauthier and hockey in the same sentence is this:
- stinger67
PROBABLY STILL BETTER THAN DION PHANEUF! LOL
SAM! GET IT???? |
|
jaymster790
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: Elsewhere, QC Joined: 03.16.2009
|
|
|
I still haven't clicked (and won't), but are you talking about Symba or sodomy? - _nay_
Yeah I just realized that my joke was poorly executed.
Oh well, certainly not the first time and definitely not the last. |
|
|
|
Is CBB's name James Leopold? - Symba007
yep |
|
Habssuperfan77
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: Brain Tumor survivor...wish they would have at least provide me with a brain after the surgery. : ( Joined: 07.26.2007
|
|
|
Is CBB's name James Leopold? - Symba007
nope.
edit : yep.
|
|
Symba007
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: No, ON Joined: 02.26.2007
|
|
|
PROBABLY STILL BETTER THAN DION PHANEUF! LOL
SAM! GET IT???? - Fan2
Good point Lasagne, good point! |
|
Symba007
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: No, ON Joined: 02.26.2007
|
|
|
_nay_
Boston Bruins |
|
|
Location: "aaaargh my leg!!!" -Max Pacioretty Joined: 04.06.2011
|
|
|
PROBABLY STILL BETTER THAN DION PHANEUF! LOL
SAM! GET IT???? - Fan2
Dion > Dion |
|
|
|
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/story/2012/05/15/ns-james-leopold-laura-lee-robertson.html - Symba007
DONT BLOW MY COVER |
|
jaymster790
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: Elsewhere, QC Joined: 03.16.2009
|
|
|
Dion > Dion - _nay_
|
|
|
|
nope.
edit : yep.
- Habssuperfan77
|
|
_nay_
Boston Bruins |
|
|
Location: "aaaargh my leg!!!" -Max Pacioretty Joined: 04.06.2011
|
|
|
[quote=jaymster790]
Is that another poorly executed joke? |
|
Feeling_Glucky
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: 2024 Stanley Cup Champion, AZ Joined: 08.18.2010
|
|
|
21. A little insight into the McDonagh trade: Right around the 2009 draft, it's believed the Canadiens struck out for the second time on Vincent Lecavalier. (There was disagreement in Tampa about whether or not it really made sense to deal him.) Glen Sather saw an opening and let Montreal know Scott Gomez was available. He pointed out, correctly, that there wasn't much out there and the Canadiens could not go without trying to fill the No. 1 centre position. They were in a weak spot and Sather exploited it.
22. When Sather realized he had a shot at making the deal, he went to Director of player personnel Gordie Clark and asked, "Who should we get?" Both Clark and assistant GM Jeff Gorton had McDonagh No. 1. The Rangers really liked him going back to the NHL combine of his draft year and always kept an eye on him. (He was taken before New York selected the late Alexei Cherepanov.) Who was No. 2 if Montreal said no? "It never got that far," Clark said.
23. Clark explained how the Rangers (and presumably every other team) keep an updated list of about four/five players from all other organizations they'd target in a deal. "We're not talking about guys like [Steven] Stamkos," he said. "Everybody wants him. It's about prospects or lesser-known players. You watch everyone else's like you watch your own." That way, when Sather needs an answer, he gets one quickly.
24. Clark added the Rangers liked McDonagh for the same reason they noticed Chris Kreider and Dylan McIlrath at their comebines. "Physically, it was like men amongst boys," he said. "You have to be careful to make certain they have the hockey sense to play the way they need to, but they really stood out." |
|
Feeling_Glucky
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: 2024 Stanley Cup Champion, AZ Joined: 08.18.2010
|
|
|
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/story/2012/05/15/ns-james-leopold-laura-lee-robertson.html - Symba007
dumb (frank)er should have called 911 and said it then, not dumped her body! |
|
|
|
21. A little insight into the McDonagh trade: Right around the 2009 draft, it's believed the Canadiens struck out for the second time on Vincent Lecavalier. (There was disagreement in Tampa about whether or not it really made sense to deal him.) Glen Sather saw an opening and let Montreal know Scott Gomez was available. He pointed out, correctly, that there wasn't much out there and the Canadiens could not go without trying to fill the No. 1 centre position. They were in a weak spot and Sather exploited it.
22. When Sather realized he had a shot at making the deal, he went to Director of player personnel Gordie Clark and asked, "Who should we get?" Both Clark and assistant GM Jeff Gorton had McDonagh No. 1. The Rangers really liked him going back to the NHL combine of his draft year and always kept an eye on him. (He was taken before New York selected the late Alexei Cherepanov.) Who was No. 2 if Montreal said no? "It never got that far," Clark said.
23. Clark explained how the Rangers (and presumably every other team) keep an updated list of about four/five players from all other organizations they'd target in a deal. "We're not talking about guys like - Feeling_Glucky[Steven] Stamkos," he said. "Everybody wants him. It's about prospects or lesser-known players. You watch everyone else's like you watch your own." That way, when Sather needs an answer, he gets one quickly.
24. Clark added the Rangers liked McDonagh for the same reason they noticed Chris Kreider and Dylan McIlrath at their comebines. "Physically, it was like men amongst boys," he said. "You have to be careful to make certain they have the hockey sense to play the way they need to, but they really stood out."
That was the greatest day in Engles thread history. |
|
jaymster790
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: Elsewhere, QC Joined: 03.16.2009
|
|
|
Says Bob Mac:
The Canadiens are in the process of touching base with potential head coach candidates including Michel Therrien, Guy Carbonneau, Marc Crawford, and Bob Hartley. Interviews have not been set up and the process is in the early stages.
Says jaymster790:
mother(frank)ing poop |
|
_nay_
Boston Bruins |
|
|
Location: "aaaargh my leg!!!" -Max Pacioretty Joined: 04.06.2011
|
|
|
21. A little insight into the McDonagh trade: Right around the 2009 draft, it's believed the Canadiens struck out for the second time on Vincent Lecavalier. (There was disagreement in Tampa about whether or not it really made sense to deal him.) Glen Sather saw an opening and let Montreal know Scott Gomez was available. He pointed out, correctly, that there wasn't much out there and the Canadiens could not go without trying to fill the No. 1 centre position. They were in a weak spot and Sather exploited it.
22. When Sather realized he had a shot at making the deal, he went to Director of player personnel Gordie Clark and asked, "Who should we get?" Both Clark and assistant GM Jeff Gorton had McDonagh No. 1. The Rangers really liked him going back to the NHL combine of his draft year and always kept an eye on him. (He was taken before New York selected the late Alexei Cherepanov.) Who was No. 2 if Montreal said no? "It never got that far," Clark said.
23. Clark explained how the Rangers (and presumably every other team) keep an updated list of about four/five players from all other organizations they'd target in a deal. "We're not talking about guys like - Feeling_Glucky[Steven] Stamkos," he said. "Everybody wants him. It's about prospects or lesser-known players. You watch everyone else's like you watch your own." That way, when Sather needs an answer, he gets one quickly.
24. Clark added the Rangers liked McDonagh for the same reason they noticed Chris Kreider and Dylan McIlrath at their comebines. "Physically, it was like men amongst boys," he said. "You have to be careful to make certain they have the hockey sense to play the way they need to, but they really stood out."
|
|
|
|
Says Bob Mac:
The Canadiens are in the process of touching base with potential head coach candidates including Michel Therrien, Guy Carbonneau, Marc Crawford, and Bob Hartley. Interviews have not been set up and the process is in the early stages.
Says jaymster790:
mother(frank)ing poop - jaymster790
weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee |
|
jaymster790
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: Elsewhere, QC Joined: 03.16.2009
|
|
|
Is that another poorly executed joke? - _nay_
That was supposed to be a laughie, I'm on fire today. |
|
Page: Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114 Next |