muffin_man
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: no problem, as s hole - Eric Engels, NY Joined: 02.10.2007
|
|
|
Waste???
Please read my above post, there are WAY more chances for the pick to be wasted by picking Galchenyuk than by picking Forsberg. - PRICEless
as long as you're sure. |
|
PRICEless
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: On sait JAMAIS!!! Faut pas jet, QC Joined: 10.11.2007
|
|
|
I read that Galchenyuk was compared to Hossa skill wise and i have an hard time comparing Forsberg with Alfredsson since they are quite different physically. Where did you read that Forsberg is #2 overall talent? First time i hear it seriously. - Habsody
He's #2/#3 on the ISS' list that regroups both Euros and NA players. |
|
muffin_man
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: no problem, as s hole - Eric Engels, NY Joined: 02.10.2007
|
|
|
I read that Galchenyuk was compared to Hossa skill wise and i have an hard time comparing Forsberg with Alfredsson since they are quite different physically. Where did you read that Forsberg is #2 overall talent? First time i hear it seriously. - Habsody
there are 693 different ranking systems out there. someone has him number 2. a month ago he wasnt top 5 anywhere i dont think.
For the record I think either would be a fine pick and am just being argumentative for the sake of it |
|
muffin_man
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: no problem, as s hole - Eric Engels, NY Joined: 02.10.2007
|
|
|
He's #2/#3 on the ISS' list that regroups both Euros and NA players. - PRICEless
wait, is he "the number 2 talent" or is he #3? |
|
PRICEless
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: On sait JAMAIS!!! Faut pas jet, QC Joined: 10.11.2007
|
|
|
as long as you're sure. - muffin_man
Bergy just called me, he said he agrees with what i was saying on the forums.
He also said "who the (frank) calls himself muffin man anyway?!?". |
|
PRICEless
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: On sait JAMAIS!!! Faut pas jet, QC Joined: 10.11.2007
|
|
|
wait, is he "the number 2 talent" or is he #3? - muffin_man
it's been changing but the last time they updated it (1-2 weeks ago) he was at #2. |
|
PRICEless
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: On sait JAMAIS!!! Faut pas jet, QC Joined: 10.11.2007
|
|
|
there are 693 different ranking systems out there. someone has him number 2. a month ago he wasnt top 5 anywhere i dont think.
For the record I think either would be a fine pick and am just being argumentative for the sake of it - muffin_man
There are a lot of rankings its true but the NHL's central and the ISS' are probably the biggest/most recognized ones. |
|
muffin_man
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: no problem, as s hole - Eric Engels, NY Joined: 02.10.2007
|
|
|
muffin_man
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: no problem, as s hole - Eric Engels, NY Joined: 02.10.2007
|
|
|
There are a lot of rankings its true but the NHL's central and the ISS' are probably the biggest/most recognized ones. - PRICEless
Please, tell me more. |
|
dt99999
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: wow, hope that's sarcasim Joined: 11.18.2008
|
|
|
We should offer Budaj + Bourque + 2nd for Crosby. - PRICEless
trade doesn't go down unless they add a 3rd |
|
Habsody
Montreal Canadiens |
|
Location: 3-Rivières, QC Joined: 12.16.2007
|
|
|
There are a lot of rankings its true but the NHL's central and the ISS' are probably the biggest/most recognized ones. - PRICEless
They also put Grigorenko over Murray which makes me wonder how accurate their analysis are...by the way, i have nothing against Forsberg; he will be a good player but from what i've seen Galchenyuk has a lot more offensive upsides. |
|
PRICEless
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: On sait JAMAIS!!! Faut pas jet, QC Joined: 10.11.2007
|
|
|
They also put Grigorenko over Murray which makes me wonder how accurate their analysis are...by the way, i have nothing against Forsberg; he will be a good player but from what i've seen Galchenyuk has a lot more offensive upsides. - Habsody
Nope grigs at #4 and Murray at #3. |
|
PRICEless
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: On sait JAMAIS!!! Faut pas jet, QC Joined: 10.11.2007
|
|
|
lol @ galchenyuk at 14
http://www.hockeysfuture..../14204/iss_top30_may2012/ - muffin_man
Galch is #4 on the NHL's NA players only draft list... That IS pretty low (all things relative, lol), puts him at 5th or 6th when you add in the euros.
Now tell me again how the habs should pick an injured #5 draftee with the #3 pick?
For the record i agree that both guys are good picks (they're top 5 after all) but my point still holds that Forsberg has the better ratio risk:reward. |
|
|
|
Russia gonna cakewalk through the rest of this tourny. |
|
Habsody
Montreal Canadiens |
|
Location: 3-Rivières, QC Joined: 12.16.2007
|
|
|
Nope grigs at #4 and Murray at #3. - PRICEless
No, Murray 4th and Trouba 5th. Whatever...their rankings are a mess. |
|
PRICEless
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: On sait JAMAIS!!! Faut pas jet, QC Joined: 10.11.2007
|
|
|
Habsody
Montreal Canadiens |
|
Location: 3-Rivières, QC Joined: 12.16.2007
|
|
|
_nay_
Boston Bruins |
|
|
Location: "aaaargh my leg!!!" -Max Pacioretty Joined: 04.06.2011
|
|
|
Phil Kessel?
- ShafterBenRaide
Mike Brown |
|
|
|
Mike Brown - _nay_
is that real? |
|
_nay_
Boston Bruins |
|
|
Location: "aaaargh my leg!!!" -Max Pacioretty Joined: 04.06.2011
|
|
|
is that real? - Cape Breton Bruins
nyes |
|
|
|
nyes - _nay_
I would choose James Riemer. |
|
Flyfreaky
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Joined: 07.20.2011
|
|
|
I would choose James Riemer. - Cape Breton Bruins
You're pretty good at this game...Too good... |
|
|
|
You're pretty good at this game...Too good... - Flyfreaky
I am a homosexual. |
|
Flyfreaky
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Joined: 07.20.2011
|
|
|
I am a homosexual. - Cape Breton Bruins
That's gay... |
|
dt99999
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: wow, hope that's sarcasim Joined: 11.18.2008
|
|
|
Russia gonna cakewalk through the rest of this tourny. - Cape Breton Bruins
going down to czech $10 |
|
Page: Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82 Next |