What about Vanek and Roy
- gibby111

I'd do it if we had an option for a center on the top 3 lines
Not sold on Flynn yet, and I do not want Goose on the third line

Vanek + for Nash
- gibby111

That makes no sense. You move out a guy that produces the same amount as the guy you're bringing in but increasing the cap hit associated. Thanks, but no thanks.

I don't need anything back other than Coyle. For us, it's a salary dump.
- HonkFortheGoose

the padawan likes the clutterbuck, as does the clown

add a second and a mid prospect to get him

That makes no sense. You move out a guy that produces the same amount as the guy you're bringing in but increasing the cap hit associated. Thanks, but no thanks.
- HonkFortheGoose

but Nash does not take dumb penalties in a 1 goal game

he is a much better all around player IMO
Vanek is one dimensional, and gets cold for long stretches

I don't need anything back other than Coyle. For us, it's a salary dump.
- HonkFortheGoose

It would have to be a "mike Richards" Deal for me

Cal Clutterbuck ( Simmonds) .Charlie Coyle ( Brayden Schenn )

but Nash does not take dumb penalties in a 1 goal game

he is a much better all around player IMO
Vanek is one dimensional, and gets cold for long stretches
- homiedclown

Nash must get cold for long stretches as well if his production is the same. The way I look at it, if you're shaking things up you're not bringing in exactly the same guy as you're shipping out. Just doesn't make sense.

Vanek to Minnesota for Coyle sends a message to the team and the rest of the league IMO.

It would have to be a "mike Richards" Deal for me

Cal Clutterbuck ( Simmonds) .Charlie Coyle ( Brayden Schenn )
- gerbe75pts

That's not a bad way to look at it. I don't know that Minnesota will part with either of them though, let alone both.

Nash must get cold for long stretches as well if his production is the same. The way I look at it, if you're shaking things up you're not bringing in exactly the same guy as you're shipping out. Just doesn't make sense.

Vanek to Minnesota for Coyle sends a message to the team and the rest of the league IMO.
- HonkFortheGoose

I guess it comes down to changing the face of the team and trying to move forward this year or rebuilding on the fly

The Sabres have the pieces to do either.

Do they have the balls to do it though?

Lets move him to the sharks
Roy , Vanek for clowe, Pavelski
- gerbe75pts

Done

I have some dumb felling we are going to get douglas Murray

I guess it comes down to changing the face of the team and trying to move forward this year or rebuilding on the fly

The Sabres have the pieces to do either.

Do they have the balls to do it though?
- homiedclown

The only way to change the face of the team is to move Miller. That's the guy that's considered the face of the team. Vanek is probably a close 2nd though.

The GM is too attached to "his" guys to do anything like this though.

The only way to change the face of the team is to move Miller. That's the guy that's considered the face of the team. Vanek is probably a close 2nd though.

The GM is too attached to "his" guys to do anything like this though.
- HonkFortheGoose

"If" Homer is right, maybe there is an overhaul in store.

I am sure most of us would like to see that happen, moving forward.

I have some dumb felling we are going to get douglas Murray
- gerbe75pts

Rivet 3.0!

The only way to change the face of the team is to move Miller. That's the guy that's considered the face of the team. Vanek is probably a close 2nd though.

The GM is too attached to "his" guys to do anything like this though.
- HonkFortheGoose

you can't Disrupt that family

"If" Homer is right, maybe there is an overhaul in store.

I am sure most of us would like to see that happen, moving forward.
- homiedclown

I think the problem at this point is that because nothing has ever been won with this group of guys, everyone's ready to try something new. They're not all bad hockey players, we're just all sick of the same result year after year. Same goes for the coach. They need to bring in a new one.

I have some dumb felling we are going to get douglas Murray
- gerbe75pts

I fear Riley falls in the draft and Darcy grabs him with our first pick

Rivet 3.0!
- CaptainRivet

2nd round pick to the sharks

2nd round pick to the sharks
- gerbe75pts

like every year

I fear Riley falls in the draft and Darcy grabs him with our first pick
- homiedclown

I would love that pick tbh

I think the problem at this point is that because nothing has ever been won with this group of guys, everyone's ready to try something new. They're not all bad hockey players, we're just all sick of the same result year after year. Same goes for the coach. They need to bring in a new one.
- HonkFortheGoose

I respect the hell out of ruff

I wish they would fire darcy and get lindy a job in the front office

then again the coach I wanted got a job recently

I think the problem at this point is that because nothing has ever been won with this group of guys, everyone's ready to try something new. They're not all bad hockey players, we're just all sick of the same result year after year. Same goes for the coach. They need to bring in a new one.
- HonkFortheGoose

"Lindy ain't goin nowhere."-Terry Pegula

I would love that pick tbh
- gerbe75pts

how many d prospects do we need though

we need to get to an ecf before we worry about suiting up a 12th d man

"Lindy ain't goin nowhere."-Terry Pegula



- CaptainRivet

quit killing my buzz

how many d prospects do we need though

we need to get to an ecf before we worry about suiting up a 12th d man
- homiedclown

You are a huge karlsson fan .

there's no doubt in my mind that you will love this pick then

"Lindy ain't goin nowhere."-Terry Pegula



- CaptainRivet

...must be nice knowing mediocrity brings that kind of job security