We're still here. I think the other guy got it.

- EKolb13

5 of his 7 copies of that post are gone.

I agree, can't see why Montreal would do it...unless Bergevin has other big moves cooking.
- Ogilthorpe2

Or a 2-3 year plan in place to re-tool the Habs thats approved by the powers that be......

I'd say that's why they signed Prust.
Moen, Cole, Pacioretty, Bourque, Eller, White, Blunden aren't small either.
- Pecafan Fan

So it's more of a thing where they're small up the middle then?

We're still here. I think the other guy got it.

- EKolb13

If you're still reading...sorry other guy.

5 of his 7 copies of that post are gone.
- NewToHockey

You kept count?

So it's more of a thing where they're small up the middle then?
- EKolb13

Yeah, in the top 6 at least. Desharnais and Plekanec aren't big and or physical.

In the Montreal rumor, even though Kane is the best player in the speculated deal...I don't see why Monteal would make the trade??

Maybe Habs fans can enlighten me...

Also if Bowman is going to give up a big name like Kane I think he will also try to get a 2nd/3rd rounder back that he spent on Oduya.

On Twitter@AlCimaglia

You kept count?
- EKolb13

I was going for a snarky response, but was too late by the time I caught up to the thread.

He's from London...Kane used to play there you know? You should just bow and kiss his ring to honor his superior Kane knowledge.
- Ogilthorpe2

C'mon Ogi...

Don't you realize that watching Kane for 1 year as an 18yo playing against kids is comparable to watching him play 5 seasons of NHL hockey against the world's best players.

Jeez...get a grip.