Eklund
Commissioner |
|
|
Joined: 09.15.2005
|
|
|
PrinceLH
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Belleville, ON Joined: 07.06.2007
|
|
|
Dislike: Get rid of the trapazoid. What's next? Europian sized ice surfaces?
Like: Not allowing them to not change the faceoff man. Taking away the placeholder winger, to buy time, is long overdue. |
|
Flyfreaky
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Joined: 07.20.2011
|
|
|
|
|
I really don't like if a team causes puck to go out of play in offensive zone, the puck stays in same zone. if it's your fault that the puck went out of play, it should benefit the defensive team and move face-off to neutral zone. However, i did play goalie, so my opinion might be a little biased. and I've been saying that spin o rama should have been illegal forever. |
|
RonPielep
|
|
|
Location: "Welcome to HockeyBuzz. Come for the rumors. Stay for the idiots." - Feds91Stammer Joined: 08.21.2014
|
|
|
Hawksfan74
Chicago Blackhawks |
|
Location: IL Joined: 05.08.2013
|
|
|
Penalizing diving with fines will have the Sedin sisters crying poor by the end of the year. |
|
Flyfreaky
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Joined: 07.20.2011
|
|
|
Penalizing diving with fines will have the Sedin sisters crying poor by the end of the year. - Hawksfan74
|
|
RobitailleFAN20
Los Angeles Kings |
|
|
Location: LA Kings fan since 1996. Favorite palyers Luc Robitaille & Rob Blake, CA Joined: 06.22.2014
|
|
|
Hopefully the expansion of replay, reviews ALL pucks that hit the netting that protects the puck from going out of bounds (LAvDET)... Absolutely BS of a non call that clearly showed puck hitting off net and into the goal, it's almost laughable.
Actually, it is laughable |
|
Muskwa
|
|
Location: Somewhere down the lazy river Joined: 03.26.2013
|
|
|
Like the changes for the most part but the fines for diving don't go far enough. They need to add a zero to make it worth more than a cup of coffee to these guys. |
|
jnwood2517
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Toronto Joined: 01.27.2009
|
|
|
Rule 85 – Puck Out of Bounds
There have been further rule changes made relating to face-off location to
avoid penalizing teams for plays intended to create bona fide scoring
opportunities. Specifically, the following are "categories of plays” where
face-offs will remain in the attacking zone despite the fact that the
attacking team was technically responsible for the stoppage in play: Shots
at the net by a player on the attacking team where: (i) the shot breaks
the glass; (ii) the shot goes off the side of the net and deflects out of
play; (iii) the shot goes off the dasher boards or glass and deflects out
of play; (iv) the shot is tipped or deflected out of play by a teammate;
and (v) the shot becomes wedged in or on the exterior of the goal net.
Well, that's sort of a big deal... |
|
jaumiller
Buffalo Sabres |
|
|
Location: Ask not what Matt Ellis can do for you, ask what can you do for Matt Ellis. , NY Joined: 12.06.2012
|
|
|
Well, that's sort of a big deal... - jnwood2517
That's going to be tough to judge in my opinion. |
|
|
|
Like the changes for the most part but the fines for diving don't go far enough. They need to add a zero to make it worth more than a cup of coffee to these guys. - Muskwa
And if it helps the team win, the organization will gladly pay the fine under the table. |
|
|
|
Dislike: Get rid of the trapazoid. What's next? Europian sized ice surfaces?
Like: Not allowing them to not change the faceoff man. Taking away the placeholder winger, to buy time, is long overdue. - PrinceLH
Getting rid of the trapezoid and widening the ice surface would both be good things. There would be more offense in both situations IMO. |
|
Streit2ThePoint
Seattle Kraken |
|
|
Location: it's disgusting how good you are at hockeybuzz. Joined: 09.20.2013
|
|
|
Streit2ThePoint
Seattle Kraken |
|
|
Location: it's disgusting how good you are at hockeybuzz. Joined: 09.20.2013
|
|
|
Getting rid of the trapezoid and widening the ice surface would both be good things. There would be more offense in both situations IMO. - McGallagher
So every arena will need to be reconstructed? Sounds like a plan. |
|
carcus
St Louis Blues |
|
|
Location: #Winnington Joined: 02.12.2009
|
|
|
That's going to be tough to judge in my opinion. - jaumiller
I don't understand.
If there is a shot at the net and it is tipped over the glass, the faceoff will now stay in the offensive zone regardless of who tipped it.
What is going to be tough about that? |
|
Flyfreaky
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Joined: 07.20.2011
|
|
|
Yes. - Streit2ThePoint
i hate it when you get straight to the point |
|
Tumbleweed
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: avid reader of the daily douche news Joined: 03.14.2014
|
|
|
Flyfreaky
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Joined: 07.20.2011
|
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xrWDhxbVypU - Tumbleweed
|
|
|
|
like? - Flyfreaky
Where is the button...
I'm apathetic about these polls... |
|
Flyfreaky
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Joined: 07.20.2011
|
|
|
Where is the button...
I'm apathetic about these polls... - Fruitcakenipple
i'm really sorry about all of this
|
|
|
|
i'm really sorry about all of this - Flyfreaky
I'm apathetic about this reply... |
|
Flyfreaky
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Joined: 07.20.2011
|
|
|
|
|
Strombone @strombone1
Can we keep the spin-o-rama and ban the shootout instead @NHL ? |
|
Tumbleweed
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: avid reader of the daily douche news Joined: 03.14.2014
|
|
|
- Flyfreaky
Don't like the new diving fines? |
|