Paul Berthelot: Blue Jackets Win One of Three Lotteries Will Select 3rd in 2016 Draft Blue Jackets win one of the lotteries will pick 3rd in 2016 draft.

Take Tkachuk/Nylander/Dubois or a D-man

You don't want Puljujarvi, bust written all over him.

Puljujarvi will be great for CBJ

Paul Berthelot: Blue Jackets Win One of Three Lotteries Will Select 3rd in 2016 Draft
Blue Jackets win one of the lotteries will pick 3rd in 2016 draft.
- Paul Berthelot

Puljarvi it is then , the face when Chiarelli realized he was out of the top 3

Puljujarvi across from Saad is absolutely lethal.

Puljarvi it is then , the face when Chiarelli realized he was out of the top 3
- Alexzanki

Like thank god I'm not expected to take one of those poopty Finnish busts. I'd rather take the true #1 in Dubois.

Good job, now all you need is a #1 C

Dubois has more bust written over him than the Finnish power houses, trust me I see them play every week.

Congrats Jackets. Was hoping they would win the lottery but moving up to 3 is big, at least that's what the wonks say. .......Wonder if someone has the Fin rated so high they'll give a bunch for the pick?

Good job, now all you need is a #1 C

Dubois has more bust written over him than the Finnish power houses, trust me I see them play every week.
- DutchSenators

How does seeing the Finns every week indicate you have anymore knowledge on Dubois being a bust?

Either way, it was clearly a joke..

Not to rain on everyone's parade here, but do we really need another winger?

With all the introductions to the NHL young players got at the end of last season, where are we going to put our big time #1 pick? Even assuming that we buy out Jared Boll or hide him in Cleveland, and David Clarkson goes on LTIR, that's only two open spots with a ton of people in line to play. Do we trade Matt Calvert?

After trading #19 everyone says we are weakest down the middle. If we are then what does a wing player do for us? Since there seem to be no defensemen worthy of the #3 pick, is it possible the CBJ might be willing to offer the pick plus something else for a 1st line center, a #2 or #3 d-man, or something else? It's something to think about.

Like thank god I'm not expected to take one of those poopty Finnish busts. I'd rather take the true #1 in Dubois.
- RonPielep

99 pts in the Q is something to sneeze about , that league is valued by many for being inferior to the WHL and OHL . As for those poopty Finns , they played amongst men.

Not to rain on everyone's parade here, but do we really need another winger?

With all the introductions to the NHL young players got at the end of last season, where are we going to put our big time #1 pick? Even assuming that we buy out Jared Boll or hide him in Cleveland, and David Clarkson goes on LTIR, that's only two open spots with a ton of people in line to play. Do we trade Matt Calvert?

After trading #19 everyone says we are weakest down the middle. If we are then what does a wing player do for us? Since there seem to be no defensemen worthy of the #3 pick, is it possible the CBJ might be willing to offer the pick plus something else for a 1st line center, a #2 or #3 d-man, or something else? It's something to think about.
- jkumpire

Nuge + ?

99 pts in the Q is something to sneeze about , that league is valued by many for being inferior to the WHL and OHL . As for those poopty Finns , they played amongst men.
- Alexzanki

It was a joke

I'd love to see this kid play forTorts