Paul Berthelot
Columbus Blue Jackets |
|
Location: Peterborough, ON Joined: 07.14.2015
|
|
|
MBFlyerfan
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Location: Be nice from now on, NJ Joined: 03.17.2006
|
|
|
As you said, some of your best prospects are IN the NHL and still very young. Its not the emergency like it would be if you were the Red Wings from a few years back. |
|
Alexzanki
Columbus Blue Jackets |
|
|
Location: Montreal, QC Joined: 06.03.2008
|
|
|
As you said, some of your best prospects are IN the NHL and still very young. Its not the emergency like it would be if you were the Red Wings from a few years back. - MBFlyerfan
This , not the first time an article like this pops up , but it seems a constant that prospect guru's overlook the team's avg age in correlation with the pipeline. I mean if Dubois and Werensky didn't pan out as teenagers and required more development, pretty sure the cbj would be much higher on that list.
I would say the hockey news takes that factor into account when they do a pipeline ranking. |
|
Raven33
Ottawa Senators |
|
|
Location: Jenn, stop copying me as I copy Garth myself! - Andrew S. Joined: 11.12.2008
|
|
|
Abramov! |
|
leafsfann
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
Location: Phoenix, AZ Joined: 05.11.2014
|
|
|
Don't put too much stock in the first article.. they had the Canucks pipeline rated at #3? Really? A team that looked to finally have started a long needed rebuild this summer, only to sign a bunch of depth players to contracts with term and have Linden leave. |
|
|
|
Don't put too much stock in the first article.. they had the Canucks pipeline rated at #3? Really? A team that looked to finally have started a long needed rebuild this summer, only to sign a bunch of depth players to contracts with term and have Linden leave. - leafsfann
A prospect pool featuring 4 blue chip players (Demko, Juolevi, Pettersson and Hughes) and quality depth (Lind, DiPietro, Gadjovich, Woo, Gaudette, etc) deserves that high of a ranking. Who else would you put ahead of them? |
|
MarcN
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
Location: London, ON Joined: 02.28.2011
|
|
|
UFA signings (poor or not) and Linden leaving have nothing to do with the quality of their pipeline. |
|
Misterbator
Calgary Flames |
|
|
Location: Monkeytown, NB Joined: 10.13.2014
|
|
|
A prospect pool featuring 4 blue chip players (Demko, Juolevi, Pettersson and Hughes) and quality depth (Lind, DiPietro, Gadjovich, Woo, Gaudette, etc) deserves that high of a ranking. Who else would you put ahead of them? - MaximumBone
The jury is still out on Demko and Juolevi being "blue chippers." |
|
Misterbator
Calgary Flames |
|
|
Location: Monkeytown, NB Joined: 10.13.2014
|
|
|
Misterbator
Calgary Flames |
|
|
Location: Monkeytown, NB Joined: 10.13.2014
|
|
|
This , not the first time an article like this pops up , but it seems a constant that prospect guru's overlook the team's avg age in correlation with the pipeline. I mean if Dubois and Werensky didn't pan out as teenagers and required more development, pretty sure the cbj would be much higher on that list.
I would say the hockey news takes that factor into account when they do a pipeline ranking. - Alexzanki
Exactly right, so in essence organizational health isn't a single measure based on prospects coming up the pipeline, which, in turn, should prompt concerned readers to relax and look at the bigger picture. |
|
BrainSap
Chicago Blackhawks |
|
Location: Toronto, ON Joined: 05.19.2016
|
|
|
Well panarin can be traded for a farm system in New York. Looks like the jackets need center depth so the rangers should be able help that out |
|
leafsfann
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
Location: Phoenix, AZ Joined: 05.11.2014
|
|
|
My thoughts exactly. I would put the Canucks prospect pool as middle of the road.. 10-15 or so. Most of these kids don't have that much proximity to the NHL. Isn't that what defines a deep prospect pool? |
|
Alexzanki
Columbus Blue Jackets |
|
|
Location: Montreal, QC Joined: 06.03.2008
|
|
|
Well panarin can be traded for a farm system in New York. Looks like the jackets need center depth so the rangers should be able help that out - BrainSap
dubois , wennberg, nash , sedlak/dubinsky give or take, I think they will fine and Foligno can always pitch in if needed. |
|
birdie03
Columbus Blue Jackets |
|
Joined: 07.01.2011
|
|
|
dubois , wennberg, nash , sedlak/dubinsky give or take, I think they will fine and Foligno can always pitch in if needed. - Alexzanki
Looking through those rose colored glasses again ??
You're hoping Dubois doesn't hit the sophomore slump; Wennberg is more like he was in '16-17, not what he was in '17-18; Nash steps up for solid 2nd/3rd line minutes/points; Sedlak takes a BIG step forward; and Dubi . . . ?, well I guess he can't get worse, so he has to be better. (But I would try to include him in a trade.)
Atkinson bounces back and gets 60 pts again.
Foligno proves that '14-15, and '16-17 weren't flukes, and that he can put up points.
Bjorkstrand will probably be about the same. If he can consistently light it up, that will be a HUGE boost to the offense.
Jenner contributes something from the start of the season, and not just the last 6 weeks !
After Panarin there's not much scoring from the forward group.
Get Panarin signed - or trade him !! I know JK hates to trade within conference, but of teams that Panarin would sign with, or sign & trade with, Florida has the best combination of players/prospects that would fit CBJ needs. |
|