Just an observation. Sometimes your opening statement on a fresh piece is confusing when you reference your previous article. Case in point, it led me to believe you were opening with the inference that Evgeni Svechnikov had talent, but was toxic. It wasn’t until the next paragraph where you stated that Svechnikov had a good attitude and deserved a shot elsewhere that I realized you were only trying to generate interest in the previous “Coffee with Carley” article in your opening. No disrespect, just a little constructive criticism. Love your articles. Probably the best on the site. Keep up the great work.
- danimal6777
That’s really good input, thanks! It may not always be necessary for me to promote that way. Let me play with the format this coming week. Thanks for taking some time and letting me know! Thanks, too, for the compliment. I screen shot these sometimes and send to my wife. It’s a blessing and I’m very grateful!