Colin Dambrauskas: Toronto Maple Leafs: 5, Halak's Blocker: 0

incredible second period by the leafs

tough game for isles, looks like they are missing Grabovski

*roll* all four lines not role them

Colin Dambrauskas: Toronto Maple Leafs: 5, Halak's Blocker: 0
- Colin_Dambrauskas

Nice to see the Leafs come back after being down... the comeback isn't really their best quality.
The third line looks sharp, Clarkson is playing good hockey!!

*roll* all four lines not role them
- BlowMonkey

ty

Also added a few extra comments re: Clarkson, Kessel, JVR.

*roll* all four lines not role them
- BlowMonkey

But the bottom two lines should have role players playing their roles as you roll the lines.

Holland played 11:40 last night.
komarov are Clarkson played 16 plus while Kessel only played 17mins.


several penaltis played a role, as did the game being over in the 2nd period, but that's the most evenly ice,time has been,distributed among forwards yet this season.

ty

Also added a few extra comments re: Clarkson, Kessel, JVR.
- Colin_Dambrauskas

Its not your fault, you're used to blogging for the flames and not having anyone read your blogs

Holland played 11:40 last night.
komarov are Clarkson played 16 plus while Kessel only played 17mins.


several penaltis played a role, as did the game being over in the 2nd period, but that's the most evenly ice,time has been,distributed among forwards yet this season.
- Badge

When you have a shot like Kessel's 17min a night might be enough

incredible second period by the leafs

tough game for isles, looks like they are missing Grabovski
- Lucas Neilson

*high fives*

Its not your fault, you're used to blogging for the flames and not having anyone read your blogs
- Cfser

incredible second period by the leafs

tough game for isles, looks like they are missing Grabovski
- Lucas Neilson

Leafs obviously aren't.

Leafs obviously aren't.
- Feeling Glucky?

- eichiefs9

*high fives*
- Yeti1181

Leafs obviously aren't.
- Feeling Glucky?

oh snap!

So if a puck is kicked towards the net and deflects off someone else its a no goal?

Makes sense i guess - just never encountered that before.

Good job guys Schooling 'em

So if a puck is kicked towards the net and deflects off someone else its a no goal?

Makes sense i guess - just never encountered that before.
- Joel_Eh

It's been encountered before. It's just usually counted as a good goal.

It's been encountered before. It's just usually counted as a good goal.
- Feeling Glucky?

That goal definitely should have counted, it was kicked yes, but not towards
the open goal, was just a fluke, but none the less, it should have counted.

When you have a shot like Kessel's 17min a night might be enough
- eichiefs9

and when you are up 5-2, playing back to back and dressing 12 forwards...give him a rest

and when you are up 5-2, playing back to back and dressing 12 forwards...give him a rest
- senstroll

11

11
- Feeling Glucky?

right
thanks

That goal definitely should have counted, it was kicked yes, but not towards
the open goal, was just a fluke, but none the less, it should have counted.
- nascarguy

according to the NHL rule book, it's not a goal. You scored 5, complaining about one that was kicked in seems a wee bit douchey to me.

according to the NHL rule book, it's not a goal. You scored 5, complaining about one that was kicked in seems a wee bit douchey to me.
- Isles_since_6

It's only not a goal if it's kicked directly in. If it hits anything else on the way in, it is a goal. According to the rule book, anyways.