Wanna blog? Start your own hockey blog with My HockeyBuzz. Register for free today!
 
Forums :: Blog World :: Paul Stewart: Two-Red System: Dividing Duties & Communicating Clearly
Author Message
Paul Stewart
Joined: 10.14.2013

Feb 19 @ 10:07 AM ET
Paul Stewart: Two-Red System: Dividing Duties & Communicating Clearly
dansmail26
Buffalo Sabres
Location: Burt, NY
Joined: 07.22.2012

Feb 19 @ 10:48 AM ET
I wish the culture though was that if the one ref positively knows the other ref is wrong that they don't automatically go along with it. As a former ref (but for swimming and basketball) I know you always want to back up your 'brother', but when there isn't any doubt...
Up2nuthun
Buffalo Sabres
Location: Amherst, NY
Joined: 04.01.2013

Feb 19 @ 12:47 PM ET
"Even so, I had no choice but to go along with it. One of the cardinal rules of hockey -- and this goes for both players and officials -- is that you never throw a teammate under the bus by showing him up."

This should have no place in hockey. Even NFL officials discuss most calls after a flag is thrown, and collectively, try to make the correct call even if this results in picking up a flag and declaring no foul occured on a play. The correct call should be the only thing that matters - not the "cardinal rules of hockey"

Additionally, the off-sides challenge should be looked at and overhauled or thrown out altogether after the season. It makes no sense that only the defending team can challenge a call to overturn a goal being scored.

Just recently, a Sabre player shot the puck from the blueline that resulted in a goal, but the linesman blew the play dead on an off-side ruling. The play could not be challenged even though replays show it was close enough to be looked at further.

I thought the whole reason for the off-sides challenge is to get the correct call on the ice. What gives?