Carol Schram: Vancouver Canucks Game Review: Limping to the Finish Line in Alberta Canucks fans turn their attention to hot NCAA prospects Thatcher Demko and Brock Boeser after their team endures two of its worst losses of the year against Edmonton and Calgary.

Bring the Bo's together

Well done Carol.

That baerstchi your "second line winger" isn't going to get 30 points and when everyone is saying he is the future he is so good all I said was chill out and look at it realistically and everyone flips out, troll troll troll we have a troll!!! The shink thing got blown right up. All I said was van should have given him a chance because he has looked pretty good, pushes the play and gets in front of the net. Granlund is what he is, a safe two way centre who in his prime should be around 25 points a year. Van doesn't need another 2 way player like that, they have tons of them. So why give up on a scoring winger without even giving him a solid chance. In a losing year why not see what you have in a guy instead of just saying screw it. We have a troll!!! This guy is a troll! When I say virtanen and McCann probably shouldn't have been in the nhl this year and should have developed a bit more. Troll!! Omg we have a troll!!

Just because someone outside of the hopeful dreams you guys conjure up tells you a more realistic expectations and possibilities you all flip out and call it trolling.

If you honestly disagree with any of this things in that paragraph please enlighten me instead of writing it all of and calling people trolls because you don't like what will most likely come to fruition. (From the old blog)

and Hunter Shinkaruk's only assist came when he tipped the Tryamkin puck past Joni Ortio into the Calgary net

Very subtle jab Carol

That baerstchi your "second line winger" isn't going to get 30 points and when everyone is saying he is the future he is so good all I said was chill out and look at it realistically and everyone flips out, troll troll troll we have a troll!!! The shink thing got blown right up. All I said was van should have given him a chance because he has looked pretty good, pushes the play and gets in front of the net. Granlund is what he is, a safe two way centre who in his prime should be around 25 points a year. Van doesn't need another 2 way player like that, they have tons of them. So why give up on a scoring winger without even giving him a solid chance. In a losing year why not see what you have in a guy instead of just saying screw it. We have a troll!!! This guy is a troll! When I say virtanen and McCann probably shouldn't have been in the nhl this year and should have developed a bit more. Troll!! Omg we have a troll!!

Just because someone outside of the hopeful dreams you guys conjure up tells you a more realistic expectations and possibilities you all flip out and call it trolling.

If you honestly disagree with any of this things in that paragraph please enlighten me instead of writing it all of and calling people trolls because you don't like what will most likely come to fruition. (From the old blog)
- Bigalow

Why are you still posting in here?

Go away to your own teams blog.

Why are you still posting in here?

Go away to your own teams blog.
- SRam19

I'll post where I want thanks for the help though 👍

And this is my blog as much as the flames. I go to about 20 van games a year

Yay, almost over!

That baerstchi your "second line winger" isn't going to get 30 points and when everyone is saying he is the future he is so good all I said was chill out and look at it realistically and everyone flips out, troll troll troll we have a troll!!! The shink thing got blown right up. All I said was van should have given him a chance because he has looked pretty good, pushes the play and gets in front of the net. Granlund is what he is, a safe two way centre who in his prime should be around 25 points a year. Van doesn't need another 2 way player like that, they have tons of them. So why give up on a scoring winger without even giving him a solid chance. In a losing year why not see what you have in a guy instead of just saying screw it. We have a troll!!! This guy is a troll! When I say virtanen and McCann probably shouldn't have been in the nhl this year and should have developed a bit more. Troll!! Omg we have a troll!!

Just because someone outside of the hopeful dreams you guys conjure up tells you a more realistic expectations and possibilities you all flip out and call it trolling.

If you honestly disagree with any of this things in that paragraph please enlighten me instead of writing it all of and calling people trolls because you don't like what will most likely come to fruition. (From the old blog)
- Bigalow

It's not what you say it's the way you say it. I can't disagree with most of what you posted but what I really disagree with is you, please leave!

That baerstchi your "second line winger" isn't going to get 30 points and when everyone is saying he is the future he is so good all I said was chill out and look at it realistically and everyone flips out, troll troll troll we have a troll!!! The shink thing got blown right up. All I said was van should have given him a chance because he has looked pretty good, pushes the play and gets in front of the net. Granlund is what he is, a safe two way centre who in his prime should be around 25 points a year. Van doesn't need another 2 way player like that, they have tons of them. So why give up on a scoring winger without even giving him a solid chance. In a losing year why not see what you have in a guy instead of just saying screw it. We have a troll!!! This guy is a troll! When I say virtanen and McCann probably shouldn't have been in the nhl this year and should have developed a bit more. Troll!! Omg we have a troll!!

Just because someone outside of the hopeful dreams you guys conjure up tells you a more realistic expectations and possibilities you all flip out and call it trolling.

If you honestly disagree with any of this things in that paragraph please enlighten me instead of writing it all of and calling people trolls because you don't like what will most likely come to fruition. (From the old blog)
- Bigalow

Honestly, I think for most its just that they dont care about your comments. It isnt like yours dont have some merit, but we have already talked incessantly over these topics. We have covered Sven his first half and second, we talked at christmas time over the rookies being kept or returned to Jrs, every minor trade gets 10 pages, both JB's mistakes and how long this rebuild is going to take have been talked about on a weekly basis. Everyone here knows the team is bad, the prospects that are coming bring some hope, but having an outsider bring up these topics again is tiresome.

Personally, I dont really care, I skip over comments and ignore ones I dont care to respond to but others here dislike the disruption. All it takes is one person to reply to your "troll" to get a debate going again on something thats been beaten to death

It's not what you say it's the way you say it. I can't disagree with most of what you posted but what I really disagree with is you, please leave!
- A_SteamingLombardi

Sorry but you stuck with the ugly truth forever

I'll post where I want thanks for the help though 👍

And this is my blog as much as the flames. I go to about 20 van games a year
- Bigalow

You should spend more time in The Flames blog worrying about your roster. The fact Shink is on your top line is hilarious. Playoffs are a long way away little fella

Sorry but you stuck with the ugly truth forever
- Bigalow

No I think we're just stuck with you forever.

Ignore Bigot Slow

You should spend more time in The Flames blog worrying about your roster. The fact Shink is on your top line is hilarious. Playoffs are a long way away little fella
- CanuckDon

I know it's funny how he's looked better then almost every Canuck winger

I'll post where I want thanks for the help though 👍

And this is my blog as much as the flames. I go to about 20 van games a year
- Bigalow

guessing they would rather you weren't around either?

WL does have a point, everything you say isn't wrong

however, it does get tiresome when you talk about your opinion as being fact and truth

That baerstchi your "second line winger" isn't going to get 30 points and when everyone is saying he is the future he is so good all I said was chill out and look at it realistically and everyone flips out, troll troll troll we have a troll!!! The shink thing got blown right up. All I said was van should have given him a chance because he has looked pretty good, pushes the play and gets in front of the net. Granlund is what he is, a safe two way centre who in his prime should be around 25 points a year. Van doesn't need another 2 way player like that, they have tons of them. So why give up on a scoring winger without even giving him a solid chance. In a losing year why not see what you have in a guy instead of just saying screw it. We have a troll!!! This guy is a troll! When I say virtanen and McCann probably shouldn't have been in the nhl this year and should have developed a bit more. Troll!! Omg we have a troll!!

Just because someone outside of the hopeful dreams you guys conjure up tells you a more realistic expectations and possibilities you all flip out and call it trolling.

If you honestly disagree with any of this things in that paragraph please enlighten me instead of writing it all of and calling people trolls because you don't like what will most likely come to fruition. (From the old blog)
- Bigalow

Well you can post something semi legible and intelligent...although your interpretation of your "all I said was" is completely BS. If you actually tried to post the above, most here would be in agreement and even engaged in a hockey discussion with you. Let me show you what in reality you really post;

You Van fans seem a little butt hurt about shinkaruk

Whatever helps you guys justify it clearly you traded a scoring winger for another defensive 4th line centre. I'm not sure why banning picks up these joke reclaim projects. Etem is a complete joke good luck with the future boys

See the difference between reality over your perceived fantasy interpretations.

So everyone here is correct that you were and are trolling...and that brings it back to me.

Excellent post from the last blog WhiteTruth. (Wow, racist name)

You should spend more time in The Flames blog worrying about your roster. The fact Shink is on your top line is hilarious. Playoffs are a long way away little fella
- CanuckDon

We suck, its the end of the season and he's played, yep, 6 whole games in the NHL... We had Derek Grant on the power play. Who you may ask? Exactly...
I liked Sven, and glad he's getting a chance with the Nucks. Shink's looked good but...6 games...

Well you can post something semi legible and intelligent...although your interpretation of your "all I said was" is completely BS. If you actually tried to post the above, most here would be in agreement and even engaged in a hockey discussion with you. Let me show you what in reality you really post;

You Van fans seem a little butt hurt about shinkaruk

Whatever helps you guys justify it clearly you traded a scoring winger for another defensive 4th line centre. I'm not sure why banning picks up these joke reclaim projects. Etem is a complete joke good luck with the future boys

See the difference between reality over your perceived fantasy interpretations.

So everyone here is correct that you were and are trolling...and that brings it back to me.
- Makita

Even that at best is such minimal trolling. People literally said that trade gives me a bad taste that was a bad trade blah blah so I said sounds like you guys are butt hurt. That's trolling... Honestly I've never seen a thread so sensitive

Even that at best is such minimal trolling. People literally said that trade gives me a bad taste that was a bad trade blah blah so I said sounds like you guys are butt hurt. That's trolling... Honestly I've never seen a thread so sensitive
- Bigalow

Try the Leafs blog...you'd be banned by now, right makita?

Sorry but you stuck with the ugly truth forever
- Bigalow

See the problem is when you post this crap then yes you are trolling.

As for your points you are making them to poke the bear, not bring any discussion. In other words if not trolling you are being an ass.

So...should our to youngsters have played in Jr again? I'm not sure they would have gained anything...but they have gained from being with the team.

Bae is doing good why bash him? Oh wait, that's right we got him from Calgary...I'm sorry we are happy with him, get over it.

Try the Leafs blog...you'd be banned by now, right makita?
- geta02it

Yes he would and I've had enough...as Alice Cooper said, No More Mr. Nice Guy