Jan Levine: Barclay Goodrow claimed off waivers as originally reported by San Jose Solid leader goes back to where he started his career

Jan Levine: Barclay Goodrow claimed off waivers as originally reported by San Jose
Solid leader goes back to where he started his career
- airjan23

The Rangers put Othmann on waivers too? That last paragraph scared me

The Rangers put Othmann on waivers too? That last paragraph scared me
- TPC

Updated to avoid heart attacks...

Trouba (25% retainment) for Petry. Then we’re free of a buyout and only 2 million on the books next year. Not a bad compromise? Petry would be serviceable 6-7 guy

Sign Kane for one year, 5 mill AAV

Sign Tanev, Lindgren and Schneider

Promote Othmann (3LW), Keep Kakko (hope for the breakout)

4th liners game to game Cuylle w/Vesey, JBrod, Edstrom and Rempe

23 man roster

Trouba (25% retainment) for Petry. Then we’re free of a buyout and only 2 million on the books next year. Not a bad compromise? Petry would be serviceable 6-7 guy

Sign Kane for one year, 5 mill AAV

Sign Tanev, Lindgren and Schneider

Promote Othmann (3LW), Keep Kakko (hope for the breakout)

4th liners game to game- Vesey, JBrod, Cuylle, Edstrom and Rempe

23
- Slimtj100

Now we're cooking with GAS.

Now we're cooking with GAS.
- blacksheep1

I noticed us not scoring enough didn’t you?

47 pts in 50 games is bad, yes

I noticed us not scoring enough didn’t you?

47 pts in 50 games is bad, yes
- Slimtj100

(frank) Tom and (frank) Patrick Kane

(frank) Tom and (frank) Patrick Kane
- picklerick

It’s sensible lol they really need to be careful because laf and Shesty are gonna get big time money. As in long term contracts at forward. Especially with Perrault coming soon

Doesn’t have to be Kane, but one year guy is probably the best course of action imo

Wow. If San Jose was on his no trade list I can’t see how the players union doesn’t get involved. It’s blatant contract circumventing.

Wow. If San Jose was on his no trade list I can’t see how the players union doesn’t get involved. It’s blatant contract circumventing.
- ChrisMS

Teams do it all the time. Look at Vegas and Tampa every season putting players on LTIR until the playoffs start. Its a loophole, nothing illegal at all

Wow. If San Jose was on his no trade list I can’t see how the players union doesn’t get involved. It’s blatant contract circumventing.
- ChrisMS

Just don’t be a (frank)in narc about it guy

Wow. If San Jose was on his no trade list I can’t see how the players union doesn’t get involved. It’s blatant contract circumventing.
- ChrisMS

This wasn’t a trade brah

Teams do it all the time. Look at Vegas and Tampa every season putting players on LTIR until the playoffs start. Its a loophole, nothing illegal at all
- TPC

Your loophole example benefits the players as well as the teams. This could be (I stress could cause San Jose very well may not have been on his list though if they wernt not sure why they didn’t just move a 7th round pick in 2026 or something) something that only hurts the player. It’s a loophole that the union might get its panties in a bunch over.

Please fix last paragraph!!! Having Neil Smith nightmares!!!

Teams do it all the time. Look at Vegas and Tampa every season putting players on LTIR until the playoffs start. Its a loophole, nothing illegal at all
- TPC

Remember the Marc Staal loophole? He had a NTC, but had to submit a no trade team list by July 1st. He forgot to (or was late doing so) and breached his clause; causing him to get traded to Detroit.

This wasn’t a trade brah
- jimbro83

No. But it’s a team telling a player when they signed him he could choose places not to get moved to. The same team then works out a deal to move him to a team on that list then back doors him. Most dudes don’t like being backdoored. Hence the union.

Remember the Marc Staal loophole? He had a NTC, but had to submit a no trade team list by July 1st. He forgot to (or was late doing so) and breached his clause; causing him to get traded to Detroit.
- mames11

Not sure that’s a loophole but blatant negligence by his agent.

No. But it’s a team telling a player when they signed him he could choose places not to get moved to. The same team then works out a deal to move him to a team on that list then back doors him. Most dudes don’t like being backdoored. Hence the union.
- ChrisMS

Never been to Manhattan, eh?

(frank) Tom and (frank) Patrick Kane
- picklerick

I'll boogie down to this.

No. But it’s a team telling a player when they signed him he could choose places not to get moved to. The same team then works out a deal to move him to a team on that list then back doors him. Most dudes don’t like being backdoored. Hence the union.
- ChrisMS

The union is well aware of the waiver process and how a 15 team NTC doesn’t mean anything when it comes to waivers.

They negotiated and signed the CBA

Never been to Manhattan, eh?
- mames11

😂

Not sure that’s a loophole but blatant negligence by his agent.
- ChrisMS

Goodrow may have had SJ on the list anyway. He played there for 6 freakin years. He knows where the local Pizza Hut is and that alone tempts guys

The union is well aware of the waiver process and how a 15 team NTC doesn’t mean anything when it comes to waivers.

They negotiated and signed the CBA
- jimbro83

Pretty sure they didn’t intend the waiver process to be able to void a players contract. Not sure they could actually do anything about it though. But if they do have their feathers ruffled it’s something that probably gets renegotiated in the next cba.

I noticed us not scoring enough didn’t you?

47 pts in 50 games is bad, yes
- Slimtj100

Ill take a health Kane, Good RW who was here before, nothing given up, only 2 more years of Panarin so they need to do something.

Goodrow may have had SJ on the list anyway. He played there for 6 freakin years. He knows where the local Pizza Hut is and that alone tempts guys
- Slimtj100

Definitely possible. But again then why do this waiver thing. Could have sent over a prospect that is in the outs whose contract was expiring. If a stink is raised I think we will find out.