Wanna blog? Start your own hockey blog with My HockeyBuzz. Register for free today!
 
Forums :: Vancouver Canucks :: HB Thinktank - Socialism vs. Capitalism: a false dichotomy
Author Message
boonerbuck
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Not Quesnel, BC
Joined: 10.11.2005

Jul 24 @ 7:58 PM ET
Imagine trying to tell me to chill after I tried to disengage the conversation on the same page that you responded to me with the link to the article, or telling me to chill out when you have engaged for 9 pages, arguments with all of these posters.

I've said it once and I'll say it again, you are one dramatic twat

- Codes1087


You kiss Marwoods ass so deep you are smoking his poopty bud every time he lights up. He's the undisputed #1 drama queen on HB. 7/8ths of the long running beefs or people who left here have one thing in common... war with Marwood. Once again, an example of you opposing something from one person but admiring a much bigger example of that kind of person.

There's less shame in drama on HB than being a liar. Show me where I called you a racist and a homophobic?

Waits for the rewrite.
golfingsince
Location: This message is Marwood approved!
Joined: 11.30.2011

Jul 24 @ 7:59 PM ET
If I ever let my friends publish my writing, it would be about the people I knew and came across in those years on the streets. The Punkers, Mods, Skins, gangsters, the bands, the druggies and street dealers, the cops good and bad, the bums and panhandlers, the insane and ultra violent, the people with hearts larger than life. I would. There are a lot of great stories that go along with 15 or so kids who take over building like Theaters and old apartment buildings as a home or a base and the freedom of it all. There would obviously be some background story about why I ended up living in squats, storage units and stairwells by the time I was 14 but the actual "book" would be about the interesting people and absolutely crazy stories that come with being in the downtown street culture in Canada.

So what I'm saying is it would be less about me than the people on the streets. You wouldnt understand.

winky face

- boonerbuck


Ruler of the streets, victim of the internet.

You're welcome, i expect 5% royalties based on the name.
Codes1087
Vancouver Canucks
Joined: 09.24.2014

Jul 24 @ 8:03 PM ET
You kiss Marwoods ass so deep you are smoking his poopty bud every time he lights up. He's the undisputed #1 drama queen on HB. 7/8ths of the long running beefs or people who left here have one thing in common... war with Marwood. Once again, an example of you opposing something from one person but admiring a much bigger example of that kind of person.

There's less shame in drama on HB than being a liar. Show me where I called you a racist and a homophobic?

Waits for the rewrite.

- boonerbuck


The one thing I'll admit, is that your incomplete sentences had me confused, as I didnt realize it was someone else you were calling a racist, homophobic and nasty (probably a good tip for your upcoming book).

For that, I apologize, your sentence fragments were poop and i misunderstood.

What does marwood have to do with anything? When did he suddenly get involved? This was between you and I, the people that jumped in against you did so on their own accord. Again, probably says something where no one has jumped in to double down on any of your claims about me, but the cavalry has come with plenty of ammo against you, you whiny dramatic twat
boonerbuck
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Not Quesnel, BC
Joined: 10.11.2005

Jul 24 @ 8:07 PM ET
I'll address some of this fiction inside the quote.

Nah, nobody questioned his credentials. We just questioned the article and that it was all based on theory. As I'm sure you're aware a scientist of any nature can come up with 100 theories before they prove any one of them. Theory is just theory until proven otherwise.

I agree and I didnt argue his theory. Once my opinion was decided for me, I started arguing about Codes horrible dishonest habit.

Again, that article was more than a month old. The date was right under the title. On a hot topic such as covid19 don't you think if there was any evidence we'd have heard more? The whole where there's smoke there's fire analogy.

I admit I didnt check the date. This little bit of honesty is sure foreign to you guys I'm sure. I never prepared for an argument because I wasnt sold on it. I think people with his credentials have a say worth listening to though. Again, I'm the only one who researched his credentials and cross searched the MSN report. I was still interested in other opinions though... just not expecting to have mine dictated.

We all dismissed it originally, except for you. Clearly there was no substance to it, it just took you longer to get there. No big deal, except you took the opportunity to jump on one of the most even keeled posters we have because of a past feud or conceived one.

Again, you take yourself too seriously. Just man up that you were wrong and move on.

- golfingsince


I love this act. I'll tell you what your opinion is then the onus is on the person to man up that they were wrong.

This never gets old.


boonerbuck
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Not Quesnel, BC
Joined: 10.11.2005

Jul 24 @ 8:10 PM ET
The one thing I'll admit, is that your incomplete sentences had me confused, as I didnt realize it was someone else you were calling a racist, homophobic and nasty (probably a good tip for your upcoming book).

For that, I apologize, your sentence fragments were poop and i misunderstood.

What does marwood have to do with anything? When did he suddenly get involved? This was between you and I, the people that jumped in against you did so on their own accord. Again, probably says something where no one has jumped in to double down on any of your claims about me, but the cavalry has come with plenty of ammo against you, you whiny dramatic twat

- Codes1087


I'll credit you with your first sliver of honesty today. thumbs up

You brought all kinds of people's names into this. You don't have any problem with the people you are ass kissing jumping in either. Yet another example of hypocrisy. Again, it depends who and not what they are doing. You have the blind bias of a child.

thumbs down
Codes1087
Vancouver Canucks
Joined: 09.24.2014

Jul 24 @ 8:13 PM ET
You brought all kinds of people's names into this. You don't have any problem with the people you are ass kissing jumping in either. Yet another example of hypocrisy. Again, it depends who and not what they are doing. You have the blind bias of a child.
- boonerbuck


I absolutely did. It was a comparison of how people can have differences of opinions on this site while still being civil and respected. I know the concept is foreign to you, because your interactions with people's opinion who differ from yours always ends up with you playing the sob story victim. Funny how the people I named have all had disagreements with me but still respect me, yet none of the people who have taken this opportunity to call you out on your dramatic bullpoop can say the same? Give your head a shake booner, you will forever have the title of being hockeybuzzs drama queen. Wear it with pride.
golfingsince
Location: This message is Marwood approved!
Joined: 11.30.2011

Jul 24 @ 8:13 PM ET
He just tried selling a story about Vantel not being like that. I lolled my winky face off. Vantel will be the first to admit that he flies off the handle if he's pressed in an argument. He quickly becomes a heartless bastard. Racism, homophobic and just downright nasty. Then he drops it and moves on and doesnt bring it up again unless he's pursued. I dont cross those lines at all but codes credibility is falling pretty fast with these narratives. One day he likes people with racist tendencies, next day he hates them depending on the person. It has more to do with who that what they say. He's a phony. A flip flopper.
- boonerbuck


Really? I can go months without arguing with Vantel but he doesn't just drop things. He doesn't hold onto them like you do, nobody does. I'm probably actually one of the next worse ones.

The victim act is getting old though. We all just witnessed everything written today yet you're trying to re-create what happened to suit your own purpose. It's nothing we haven't seen before.

It's pretty simple, your objective was to start something with Codes. Next objective is to point to the 'gang, minions, sheep, lemmings' whatever the (frank) you decide to call us now. Mission accomplished. As a side note, you can also point to the side threads and say 'see, they're not inclusive'.

Of course, that might not happen for months or years when you figure people have forgotten. Today is July 24th 2020. For easy reference for anybody in the future it's the blog written before today.

You got your fight in, something you've wanted since I've known you're persona. Can you move on now or is this something that will get drug up every time you disagree with Codes or any of us.

Recap: You posted something controversial. You posted a BS link. Everybody that commented either dismissed it or called it BS. You kept going after Codes about some other time. Eventually, you dismissed it yourself but insinuated you were the hero for looking at credentials then debunking through CDC. Nobody else that read the article needed that much research to debunk it. I think that pretty much covers it ?
Codes1087
Vancouver Canucks
Joined: 09.24.2014

Jul 24 @ 8:14 PM ET
I'll credit you with your first sliver of honesty today. thumbs up

You brought all kinds of people's names into this. You don't have any problem with the people you are ass kissing jumping in either. Yet another example of hypocrisy. Again, it depends who and not what they are doing. You have the blind bias of a child.

thumbs down

- boonerbuck


Should we get into re-writes or?
Codes1087
Vancouver Canucks
Joined: 09.24.2014

Jul 24 @ 8:16 PM ET
Really? I can go months without arguing with Vantel but he doesn't just drop things. He doesn't hold onto them like you do, nobody does. I'm probably actually one of the next worse ones.

The victim act is getting old though. We all just witnessed everything written today yet you're trying to re-create what happened to suit your own purpose. It's nothing we haven't seen before.

It's pretty simple, your objective was to start something with Codes. Next objective is to point to the 'gang, minions, sheep, lemmings' whatever the (frank) you decide to call us now. Mission accomplished. As a side note, you can also point to the side threads and say 'see, they're not inclusive'.

Of course, that might not happen for months or years when you figure people have forgotten. Today is July 24th 2020. For easy reference for anybody in the future it's the blog written before today.

You got your fight in, something you've wanted since I've known you're persona. Can you move on now or is this something that will get drug up every time you disagree with Codes or any of us.

Recap: You posted something controversial. You posted a BS link. Everybody that commented either dismissed it or called it BS. You kept going after Codes about some other time. Eventually, you dismissed it yourself but insinuated you were the hero for looking at credentials then debunking through CDC. Nobody else that read the article needed that much research to debunk it. I think that pretty much covers it ?

- golfingsince



golfingsince
Location: This message is Marwood approved!
Joined: 11.30.2011

Jul 24 @ 8:21 PM ET
I'll address some of this fiction inside the quote.



I love this act. I'll tell you what your opinion is then the onus is on the person to man up that they were wrong.

This never gets old.

- boonerbuck


There's no fiction.

We all know you're an avid conspiracy theorist. Is Kaaptan your alt? Just asking.

So all theories are true? If not they must be proven or do you just get to pick which ones are true without real data.

The 2nd bolded. Yikes, there goes the conspiracy theory again. Question everything but your own stupidity.

The 3rd. Yeah man, it's all Codes fault for not wanting to destroy Carol's thread. At least you came in here this time instead of hijacking another thread. Look at you, rambling on about poop for pages in circles. The only person that can't see that you don't make any sense is you.
golfingsince
Location: This message is Marwood approved!
Joined: 11.30.2011

Jul 24 @ 8:43 PM ET
I absolutely did. It was a comparison of how people can have differences of opinions on this site while still being civil and respected. I know the concept is foreign to you, because your interactions with people's opinion who differ from yours always ends up with you playing the sob story victim. Funny how the people I named have all had disagreements with me but still respect me, yet none of the people who have taken this opportunity to call you out on your dramatic bullpoop can say the same? Give your head a shake booner, you will forever have the title of being hockeybuzzs drama queen. Wear it with pride.
- Codes1087



The real housewives of hockeybuzz.
Marwood
Location: Cumberland, BC
Joined: 03.18.2010

Jul 24 @ 8:53 PM ET
You kiss Marwoods ass so deep you are smoking his poopty bud every time he lights up. He's the undisputed #1 drama queen on HB. 7/8ths of the long running beefs or people who left here have one thing in common... war with Marwood. Once again, an example of you opposing something from one person but admiring a much bigger example of that kind of person.

There's less shame in drama on HB than being a liar. Show me where I called you a racist and a homophobic?

Waits for the rewrite.

- boonerbuck

golfingsince
Location: This message is Marwood approved!
Joined: 11.30.2011

Jul 24 @ 8:58 PM ET

- Marwood


Data has been gathered by the Trump science academy.

Marwood
Location: Cumberland, BC
Joined: 03.18.2010

Jul 24 @ 9:10 PM ET
Data has been gathered by the Trump science academy.
- golfingsince

His persistence is impressive I guess.
Codes1087
Vancouver Canucks
Joined: 09.24.2014

Jul 24 @ 9:10 PM ET
His persistence is impressive I guess.
- Marwood


Impressive isnt the word that I would have used
Marwood
Location: Cumberland, BC
Joined: 03.18.2010

Jul 24 @ 9:12 PM ET
Impressive isnt the word that I would have used
- Codes1087

Troubling?
golfingsince
Location: This message is Marwood approved!
Joined: 11.30.2011

Jul 24 @ 9:14 PM ET
His persistence is impressive I guess.
- Marwood


I've seen Boonerpassthebuck post for a dozen years. He's never been wrong once that I can remember. I've seen everyone else at least once say they stand corrected or I was wrong/mistaken etc. It's absolutely insane.
boonerbuck
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Not Quesnel, BC
Joined: 10.11.2005

Jul 24 @ 9:16 PM ET
I absolutely did. It was a comparison of how people can have differences of opinions on this site while still being civil and respected. I know the concept is foreign to you, because your interactions with people's opinion who differ from yours always ends up with you playing the sob story victim. Funny how the people I named have all had disagreements with me but still respect me, yet none of the people who have taken this opportunity to call you out on your dramatic bullpoop can say the same? Give your head a shake booner, you will forever have the title of being hockeybuzzs drama queen. Wear it with pride.
- Codes1087


What I find funny about this whole narrative of yours is when I posted the BCTV report a couple of weeks back... even though I only tried to clarify what was in the report and was on the same page as the expert you said you respected, you projected otherwise. You ignored vantel downplaying covid and tried to change the context of what I was saying instead.

I did not get mouthy or condescending which you had already started. I didnt peruse you in here where you came to whine about it. There was no beef. We dont have a history of beefs outside a few short skirmishes that we dint take seriously. So what is your big trip really about? You talk about me not being able to handle a difference of opinion over and over but I dint express one... yet here you are spewing hate over someone rejecting your assumptions of opinions.. Clearly you are a major narcissist. Without an argument you took our first conversation personal and blame me for you not going in the main thread. Now you inform me you hated me before this argument. It certainly doesnt hurt my feelings but it underlines who really has a problem with different opinions or you wouldnt fabricate peoples intentions and opinions or keep expressing in here how much you hate the opinions and topics people discuss in the main thread.

You are deflecting everything about your narcissism on others. It's a joke that you run to the politics thread to hide from political talk. It's hilarious that you hide in the same thread from Kap that he is most likely to hang around. Now you've adopted Marwoods and Bloated's narrative about me and this is something you denied being capable in the past.

This is all about you seething from opinions and topics you cant control. You are little control freak. Its out in the open. All one has to do is read through your contradictions.


Codes1087
Vancouver Canucks
Joined: 09.24.2014

Jul 24 @ 9:18 PM ET
What I find funny about this whole narrative of yours is when I posted the BCTV report a couple of weeks back... even though I only tried to clarify what was in the report and was on the same page as the expert you said you respected, you projected otherwise. You ignored vantel downplaying covid and tried to change the context of what I was saying instead.

I did not get mouthy or condescending which you had already started. I didnt peruse you in here where you came to whine about it. There was no beef. We dont have a history of beefs outside a few short skirmishes that we dint take seriously. So what is your big trip really about? You talk about me not being able to handle a difference of opinion over and over but I dint express one... yet here you are spewing hate over someone rejecting your assumptions of opinions.. Clearly you are a major narcissist. Without an argument you took our first conversation personal and blame me for you not going in the main thread. Now you inform me you hated me before this argument. It certainly doesnt hurt my feelings but it underlines who really has a problem with different opinions or you wouldnt fabricate peoples intentions and opinions or keep expressing in here how much you hate the opinions and topics people discuss in the main thread.

You are deflecting everything about your narcissism on others. It's a joke that you run to the politics thread to hide from political talk. It's hilarious that you hide in the same thread from Kap that he is most likely to hang around. Now you've adopted Marwoods and Bloated's narrative about me and this is something you denied being capable in the past.

This is all about you seething from opinions and topics you cant control. You are little control freak. Its out in the open. All one has to do is read through your contradictions.

- boonerbuck


Honesty, this is too long and I dont care enough to listen to you or give you the time. I dont like you and dont respect you. Best for you, me, the rest of the posters and Carol that we ignore eachother. /end.
Marwood
Location: Cumberland, BC
Joined: 03.18.2010

Jul 24 @ 9:20 PM ET
What I find funny about this whole narrative of yours is when I posted the BCTV report a couple of weeks back... even though I only tried to clarify what was in the report and was on the same page as the expert you said you respected, you projected otherwise. You ignored vantel downplaying covid and tried to change the context of what I was saying instead.

I did not get mouthy or condescending which you had already started. I didnt peruse you in here where you came to whine about it. There was no beef. We dont have a history of beefs outside a few short skirmishes that we dint take seriously. So what is your big trip really about? You talk about me not being able to handle a difference of opinion over and over but I dint express one... yet here you are spewing hate over someone rejecting your assumptions of opinions.. Clearly you are a major narcissist. Without an argument you took our first conversation personal and blame me for you not going in the main thread. Now you inform me you hated me before this argument. It certainly doesnt hurt my feelings but it underlines who really has a problem with different opinions or you wouldnt fabricate peoples intentions and opinions or keep expressing in here how much you hate the opinions and topics people discuss in the main thread.

You are deflecting everything about your narcissism on others. It's a joke that you run to the politics thread to hide from political talk. It's hilarious that you hide in the same thread from Kap that he is most likely to hang around. Now you've adopted Marwoods and Bloated's narrative about me and this is something you denied being capable in the past.

This is all about you seething from opinions and topics you cant control. You are little control freak. Its out in the open. All one has to do is read through your contradictions.

- boonerbuck

You really need to shut the f*ck up. No one gives a sh*t about your mental breakdown. Your hallucinations are no longer amusing. Save the drama for your book launch. F*ck off.
boonerbuck
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Not Quesnel, BC
Joined: 10.11.2005

Jul 24 @ 9:23 PM ET
Really? I can go months without arguing with Vantel but he doesn't just drop things. He doesn't hold onto them like you do, nobody does. I'm probably actually one of the next worse ones.

The victim act is getting old though. We all just witnessed everything written today yet you're trying to re-create what happened to suit your own purpose. It's nothing we haven't seen before.

It's pretty simple, your objective was to start something with Codes. Next objective is to point to the 'gang, minions, sheep, lemmings' whatever the (frank) you decide to call us now. Mission accomplished. As a side note, you can also point to the side threads and say 'see, they're not inclusive'.

Of course, that might not happen for months or years when you figure people have forgotten. Today is July 24th 2020. For easy reference for anybody in the future it's the blog written before today.

You got your fight in, something you've wanted since I've known you're persona. Can you move on now or is this something that will get drug up every time you disagree with Codes or any of us.

Recap: You posted something controversial. You posted a BS link. Everybody that commented either dismissed it or called it BS. You kept going after Codes about some other time. Eventually, you dismissed it yourself but insinuated you were the hero for looking at credentials then debunking through CDC. Nobody else that read the article needed that much research to debunk it. I think that pretty much covers it ?

- golfingsince


Dont even dare talk about me keeping things going for ever. The poop about my childhood was mentioned to Lefty in a discussion three years ago that involved no one else and was a single post and we dropped it. I left it alone after that. It had nothing to do with you guys... but three years later it's your battle banner still. This is just another piece of fiction. No one here keeps an old beef going like you guys then you run in here when people get sick of it and keep it going.
golfingsince
Location: This message is Marwood approved!
Joined: 11.30.2011

Jul 24 @ 9:24 PM ET
What I find funny about this whole narrative of yours is when I posted the BCTV report a couple of weeks back... even though I only tried to clarify what was in the report and was on the same page as the expert you said you respected, you projected otherwise. You ignored vantel downplaying covid and tried to change the context of what I was saying instead.

I did not get mouthy or condescending which you had already started. I didnt peruse you in here where you came to whine about it. There was no beef. We dont have a history of beefs outside a few short skirmishes that we dint take seriously. So what is your big trip really about? You talk about me not being able to handle a difference of opinion over and over but I dint express one... yet here you are spewing hate over someone rejecting your assumptions of opinions.. Clearly you are a major narcissist. Without an argument you took our first conversation personal and blame me for you not going in the main thread. Now you inform me you hated me before this argument. It certainly doesnt hurt my feelings but it underlines who really has a problem with different opinions or you wouldnt fabricate peoples intentions and opinions or keep expressing in here how much you hate the opinions and topics people discuss in the main thread.

You are deflecting everything about your narcissism on others. It's a joke that you run to the politics thread to hide from political talk. It's hilarious that you hide in the same thread from Kap that he is most likely to hang around. Now you've adopted Marwoods and Bloated's narrative about me and this is something you denied being capable in the past.

This is all about you seething from opinions and topics you cant control. You are little control freak. Its out in the open. All one has to do is read through your contradictions.

- boonerbuck


I can recommend a therapist.
golfingsince
Location: This message is Marwood approved!
Joined: 11.30.2011

Jul 24 @ 9:26 PM ET
Dont even dare talk about me keeping things going for ever. The poop about my childhood was mentioned to Lefty in a discussion three years ago that involved no one else and was a single post and we dropped it. I left it alone after that. It had nothing to do with you guys... but three years later it's your battle banner still. This is just another piece of fiction. No one here keeps an old beef going like you guys then you run in here when people get sick of it and keep it going.
- boonerbuck


You keep things going forever!

Who the (frank) mentioned your childhood? Oh right, you.

No matter how good you think your drugs are, they aren't good enough.
boonerbuck
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Not Quesnel, BC
Joined: 10.11.2005

Jul 24 @ 9:27 PM ET
You really need to shut the f*ck up. No one gives a sh*t about your mental breakdown. Your hallucinations are no longer amusing. Save the drama for your book launch. F*ck off.
- Marwood


Poor Marwood. I imagine you'll lose sleep tonight because you didnt get your way again.

You guys are always trying to bait me into here for a pile on and when I come in and show defiance... you completely fall apart.

I've known people like you in the past. All mouth, all lies, all full of self importance.

love emoticon


boonerbuck
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Not Quesnel, BC
Joined: 10.11.2005

Jul 24 @ 9:28 PM ET
I can recommend a therapist.
- golfingsince


With the job this person has done with you, I may as well call a 1-800 psychic.

laughy face
Page: Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157, 158, 159, 160, 161, 162, 163, 164, 165, 166, 167, 168, 169, 170, 171, 172, 173, 174, 175, 176, 177, 178, 179, 180, 181, 182, 183, 184, 185, 186, 187, 188, 189, 190, 191, 192, 193, 194, 195, 196, 197, 198, 199, 200, 201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208, 209, 210, 211, 212, 213, 214, 215, 216, 217, 218, 219, 220, 221, 222, 223, 224, 225, 226, 227, 228, 229, 230, 231, 232, 233, 234, 235, 236, 237, 238, 239, 240, 241, 242, 243, 244, 245, 246, 247, 248, 249, 250, 251, 252, 253, 254, 255, 256, 257, 258, 259, 260, 261, 262, 263, 264, 265, 266, 267, 268, 269, 270, 271, 272, 273, 274, 275, 276, 277, 278, 279, 280, 281, 282, 283, 284, 285, 286, 287, 288, 289, 290, 291, 292, 293, 294  Next