mdw7413
New York Rangers |
|
|
Location: I would rather see a dudes hairy balls than his hairy feet-Jimbro Joined: 12.13.2013
|
|
|
Thats much better, petterson can be our forsberg - tbreinold
No way they trade Petterson though. I wouldn't |
|
Tonybere
New York Rangers |
|
|
Location: ON Joined: 02.04.2016
|
|
|
Burger King ANYTHING - Fenrir
FIFY |
|
TommyGTrain
New York Rangers |
|
Location: Part of NJ where its Taylor Ham not pork roll Joined: 05.19.2017
|
|
|
I think he's a guy that would be off limits to them
I'd prefer Boesner over Horvat though - jimbro83
Usually we are on the same page, disagree here. I like Horvat better, true center that would slot in perfectly on 2nd line for us. Has leadership qualities too. Also signed for 4 more years at reasonable cap. All a pipe dream anyway......... |
|
jimbro83
New York Rangers |
|
|
Location: Lets Go Rangers!, NY Joined: 12.25.2009
|
|
|
Usually we are on the same page, disagree here. I like Horvat better, true center that would slot in perfectly on 2nd line for us. Has leadership qualities too. Also signed for 4 more years at reasonable cap. All a pipe dream anyway......... - TommyGTrain
yeah I could see that, I do think Boeser will be more of a scorer, but he needs a new contract, he could be looking at 7 mil a year |
|
tomburton99
New York Rangers |
|
|
Location: NYR distrust, NJ Joined: 07.13.2009
|
|
|
Usually we are on the same page, disagree here. I like Horvat better, true center that would slot in perfectly on 2nd line for us. Has leadership qualities too. Also signed for 4 more years at reasonable cap. All a pipe dream anyway......... - TommyGTrain
|
|
Harambe
Columbus Blue Jackets |
|
|
Location: Cincinatti Zoo - Gorilla Enclosure, OH Joined: 07.28.2016
|
|
|
No way they trade Petterson though. I wouldn't - mdw7413
|
|
Tonybere
New York Rangers |
|
|
Location: ON Joined: 02.04.2016
|
|
|
Let’s say the Devils take Kakko and VAN offers Horvat and 10 for the #2, you doing it? - nyrangers9479
You don't disappoint, that's for sure. |
|
Slimtj100
New York Rangers |
|
Location: Panarins NYC apt Joined: 03.04.2013
|
|
|
- Harambe
Lmao 😂 that’s a good gif |
|
mdw7413
New York Rangers |
|
|
Location: I would rather see a dudes hairy balls than his hairy feet-Jimbro Joined: 12.13.2013
|
|
|
- Harambe
Go back to stroking off Mayfield |
|
Slimtj100
New York Rangers |
|
Location: Panarins NYC apt Joined: 03.04.2013
|
|
|
Go back to stroking off Mayfield - mdw7413
I’d at least consider Elias and the 10 lol. But I’m to excited to get Kakko or Hughes, I can’t trade the two pick for pretty much anyone not named Conner McDavid |
|
tomburton99
New York Rangers |
|
|
Location: NYR distrust, NJ Joined: 07.13.2009
|
|
|
You don't disappoint, that's for sure. - Tonybere
Jack Hughes, no points at this WC. Makes you think... |
|
|
|
You don't disappoint, that's for sure. - Tonybere
Rule #1 of a hockey rumor site, never talk about hockey hypotheticals.
Rule #2 of a hockey rumor site, never propose a hockey related question to spark a conversation.
Rule #3 of a hockey rumor site, follow rules #1 and 2. |
|
tomburton99
New York Rangers |
|
|
Location: NYR distrust, NJ Joined: 07.13.2009
|
|
|
Rule #1 of a hockey rumor site, never talk about hockey hypotheticals.
Rule #2 of a hockey rumor site, never propose a hockey related question to spark a conversation.
Rule #3 of a hockey rumor site, follow rules #1 and 2. - nyrangers9479
|
|
Slimtj100
New York Rangers |
|
Location: Panarins NYC apt Joined: 03.04.2013
|
|
|
Rule #1 of a hockey rumor site, never talk about hockey hypotheticals.
Rule #2 of a hockey rumor site, never propose a hockey related question to spark a conversation.
Rule #3 of a hockey rumor site, follow rules #1 and 2. - nyrangers9479
Haha you tell em! |
|
|
|
I’d at least consider Elias and the 10 lol. But I’m to excited to get Kakko or Hughes, I can’t trade the two pick for pretty much anyone not named Conner McDavid - Slimtj100
If it’s Kakko at #1 I would consider trading the #2 pick (Hughes). Get a young center in return ++.
Domi 15+
Horvat 10+
Etc |
|
|
|
Eklund says panarin to Florida is unlikely. Faaaaaack he’ll be a Panther - Slimtj100
I still wanna go with having his ex-coach who didn't use him properly the first time is not a lot of incentive... |
|
Slimtj100
New York Rangers |
|
Location: Panarins NYC apt Joined: 03.04.2013
|
|
|
If it’s Kakko at #1 I would consider trading the #2 pick (Hughes). Get a young center in return ++.
Domi 15+
Horvat 10+
Etc - nyrangers9479
You don’t like Hughes size I assume? I’m not worried about it. I do think it’ll take a year or two to see his full potential tho, Kakko should be a first liner with that production opening night. |
|
mdw7413
New York Rangers |
|
|
Location: I would rather see a dudes hairy balls than his hairy feet-Jimbro Joined: 12.13.2013
|
|
|
Rule #1 of a hockey rumor site, never talk about hockey hypotheticals.
Rule #2 of a hockey rumor site, never propose a hockey related question to spark a conversation.
Rule #3 of a hockey rumor site, follow rules #1 and 2. - nyrangers9479
You literally get a bunch of responses to whenever you post a hypothetical, then say you aren't allowed to talk about it. I have to ask, are you on medication? |
|
Blueshirts16
New York Rangers |
|
Location: Rangers Sweep Icelanders...go , NY Joined: 07.28.2009
|
|
|
It’s absurd to think someone would be disappointed if we get Hughes.
I think that all along we have felt that Hughes goes #1, therefore we’ve done all the research, watched the highlights, and have become really excited about getting Kakko. That said, if the Devils take him, I can see the fan base overwhelmingly happy about getting an American elite talent to be our #1 Center for many years to come |
|
tomburton99
New York Rangers |
|
|
Location: NYR distrust, NJ Joined: 07.13.2009
|
|
|
It’s absurd to think someone would be disappointed if we get Hughes.
I think that all along we have felt that Hughes goes #1, therefore we’ve done all the research, watched the highlights, and have become really excited about getting Kakko. That said, if the Devils take him, I can see the fan base overwhelmingly happy about getting an American elite talent to be our #1 Center for many years to come - Blueshirts16
Hughes = RNH-lite. Change my mind. |
|
Harambe
Columbus Blue Jackets |
|
|
Location: Cincinatti Zoo - Gorilla Enclosure, OH Joined: 07.28.2016
|
|
|
Rule #1 of a hockey rumor site, never talk about hockey hypotheticals.
Rule #2 of a hockey rumor site, never propose a hockey related question to spark a conversation.
Rule #3 of a hockey rumor site, follow rules #1 and 2. - nyrangers9479
Rule #4: Make a set of strawman/inaccurate rules because people give negative feedback to your bad ideas |
|
jimbro83
New York Rangers |
|
|
Location: Lets Go Rangers!, NY Joined: 12.25.2009
|
|
|
Hughes = RNH-lite. Change my mind. - tomburton99
all we really have to do is look up your posts all year long desperate for the Rangers to lose on purpose so they can get Jack Hughes.
|
|
tomburton99
New York Rangers |
|
|
Location: NYR distrust, NJ Joined: 07.13.2009
|
|
|
all we really have to do is look up your posts all year long desperate for the Rangers to lose on purpose so they can get Jack Hughes. - jimbro83
Yeah but do you people want Kakko? Plus Hughes has a lot of skill, maybe too much skill. Not enough jam. |
|
jimbro83
New York Rangers |
|
|
Location: Lets Go Rangers!, NY Joined: 12.25.2009
|
|
|
Yeah but do you people want Kakko? Plus Hughes has a lot of skill, maybe too much skill. Not enough jam. - tomburton99
I think both are potentially elite, I prefer Kakko, but I'd be quite happy with Hughes |
|
Slimtj100
New York Rangers |
|
Location: Panarins NYC apt Joined: 03.04.2013
|
|
|
You literally get a bunch of responses to whenever you post a hypothetical, then say you aren't allowed to talk about it. I have to ask, are you on medication? - mdw7413
Every trade no matter who or what is coming or going is negative tho, or can’t ever possibly happen like using Kreider to move up couldn’t possibly happen in a million years |
|