Wanna blog? Start your own hockey blog with My HockeyBuzz. Register for free today!
 
Forums :: Blog World :: Michael Pachla: Is this $72.5M Sabres roster playoff-worthy?
Author Message
Michael Pachla
Buffalo Sabres
Location: solid!!!
Joined: 09.05.2007

Sep 11 @ 1:15 PM ET
If TP and Co are that serious on slashing costs and creating an internal cap, I wouldn't be shocked at all if they're secretly dangling Eichel already. For Buffalo fans sake I hope not but when it comes to shrewd business moves, I wouldn't be surprised at all!
- NewfieStud

it's speculation at this point...this blog was an exercise in building a roster in a worst-case scenario
SabresFaninIndiana
Buffalo Sabres
Location: Bananaville, IN
Joined: 12.16.2009

Sep 11 @ 1:17 PM ET
@TFP
ยท
15m
Golden Knights, Lehner agree to 5-year, $25M contract

- GilPerreault11

thats a good contract for both
Michael Pachla
Buffalo Sabres
Location: solid!!!
Joined: 09.05.2007

Sep 11 @ 1:24 PM ET
thats a good contract for both
- SabresFaninIndiana

i don't know...he could very well falter, even behind that team and the way it plays team-d
GilPerreault11
Buffalo Sabres
Location: IL
Joined: 07.21.2011

Sep 11 @ 1:31 PM ET
i don't know...he could very well falter, even behind that team and the way it plays team-d
- Michael Pachla


Behind a pretty weak Sabres team and all his issues he still had a 920 save percentage one year and 924 another year and his career average is 918. I think he deserves that contract and I always liked him more than the masses.
bikeguy99
New Jersey Devils
Joined: 09.05.2017

Sep 11 @ 1:51 PM ET
No. Olosfson isn't a 1LW, and Skinner is a fringe 2LW. DeMelo is a solid RD, but in no way is he top pairing material. You need a 1RD, and a true 1LW. Cozens will certainly be an x-factor and you would need some serious results out of the prospect in his rookie season to help with these deficiencies.

IF you are able to acquire a true 1LW (Hall/Hoffman/Dadanov), then you'd be looking at a much more stable top 3 lines.
RhinoFan
Buffalo Sabres
Location: Visionville
Joined: 10.12.2015

Sep 11 @ 2:04 PM ET
No. Olosfson isn't a 1LW, and Skinner is a fringe 2LW. DeMelo is a solid RD, but in no way is he top pairing material. You need a 1RD, and a true 1LW. Cozens will certainly be an x-factor and you would need some serious results out of the prospect in his rookie season to help with these deficiencies.

IF you are able to acquire a true 1LW (Hall/Hoffman/Dadanov), then you'd be looking at a much more stable top 3 lines.

- bikeguy99


Olo just played his rookie year with 42pts in 54g. I'd give him at least a couple years in the league before we say he doesn't have top line talent, he's certainly got the goal scoring ability.

Agreed on DeMelo and Cozens. Skinner is better than a fringe 2LW though.
NewfieStud
Toronto Maple Leafs
Joined: 03.04.2013

Sep 11 @ 2:13 PM ET
it's speculation at this point...this blog was an exercise in building a roster in a worst-case scenario
- Michael Pachla



For sure. Would be crappy to see Buffalo turn into another Ottawa situation where the fans have turned on there owner.
SabresFaninIndiana
Buffalo Sabres
Location: Bananaville, IN
Joined: 12.16.2009

Sep 11 @ 2:16 PM ET
i don't know...he could very well falter, even behind that team and the way it plays team-d
- Michael Pachla

the only thing that would bother me if i were a VGK fan would be the years.. i know he isn't old but goalies are a weird group and sometimes things change quickly
Michael Pachla
Buffalo Sabres
Location: solid!!!
Joined: 09.05.2007

Sep 11 @ 2:16 PM ET
No. Olosfson isn't a 1LW, and Skinner is a fringe 2LW. DeMelo is a solid RD, but in no way is he top pairing material. You need a 1RD, and a true 1LW. Cozens will certainly be an x-factor and you would need some serious results out of the prospect in his rookie season to help with these deficiencies.

IF you are able to acquire a true 1LW (Hall/Hoffman/Dadanov), then you'd be looking at a much more stable top 3 lines.

- bikeguy99


i don't think jack needs one of those you mentioned for his line to be successful:

2018-19--skinner 40 goals (career high,) eichel 82 points, reinhart 65 points (career high)
2019-20--rookie olofsson 20 goals/42 points (54 games,) eichel 78 points (68 games) reinhart 50 points (69 games)

Michael Pachla
Buffalo Sabres
Location: solid!!!
Joined: 09.05.2007

Sep 11 @ 2:17 PM ET
Olo just played his rookie year with 42pts in 54g. I'd give him at least a couple years in the league before we say he doesn't have top line talent, he's certainly got the goal scoring ability.

Agreed on DeMelo and Cozens. Skinner is better than a fringe 2LW though.

- RhinoFan

am of the opinion that a top-notch d-man doesn't need a top-notch #2 next to him...

any of demelo, miller, joker or montour will do
warsawkid
Buffalo Sabres
Location: west seneca, NY
Joined: 07.02.2006

Sep 11 @ 2:28 PM ET
by the way Mike, i did like the roster, would love that trade spending to the cap or having an internal cap if indeed that happens.
navinrjohnson
Buffalo Sabres
Location: We are finally good, NY
Joined: 12.08.2009

Sep 11 @ 2:46 PM ET
thats a good contract for both
- SabresFaninIndiana

unless he hits the sauce again
navinrjohnson
Buffalo Sabres
Location: We are finally good, NY
Joined: 12.08.2009

Sep 11 @ 2:48 PM ET
it's speculation at this point...this blog was an exercise in building a roster in a worst-case scenario
- Michael Pachla

trade johansson for a third rd pick

put tage in his slot, just saved another 3.6 mil


navinrjohnson
Buffalo Sabres
Location: We are finally good, NY
Joined: 12.08.2009

Sep 11 @ 2:51 PM ET
Skinner is a fringe 2LW.
- bikeguy99




https://www.quanthockey.c...easons-players-stats.html

the guy is 8th in even strength goals for the last 5 years, but a fringe 2nd line player
navinrjohnson
Buffalo Sabres
Location: We are finally good, NY
Joined: 12.08.2009

Sep 11 @ 2:51 PM ET
the only thing that would bother me if i were a VGK fan would be the years.. i know he isn't old but goalies are a weird group and sometimes things change quickly
- SabresFaninIndiana

barasso and murray both went into funks


as well as many others
Lunaion
Joined: 05.23.2016

Sep 11 @ 2:58 PM ET
Cutting budget and trading 8 is such a giant conflict.

Bit disappointed that you had to resort to a straight salary dump on Montour. Was looking forward to seeing you squirm a little harder to get down to that number. I think getting value on that kind of move is almost impossible this year. Not to say he can't be moved, but that it would bring back salary.
Pegullaville
Buffalo Sabres
Location: Toronto
Joined: 03.16.2011

Sep 11 @ 3:09 PM ET
it's speculation at this point...this blog was an exercise in building a roster in a worst-case scenario
- Michael Pachla


I also had us moving Risto and Montour in a cost cutting exercise, even if its simply shuffling the chairs with money in and money out deals as you specified in the Monahan deal.

I like the roster but just worry about the goaltending still.

Hopefully we could replace moving 8th OA however with Mitts/Thompson and the 2021 first
GERBE!!!75PTS
San Jose Sharks
Location: Show me a good loser, and I'll show you a loser." - Jack Eichel-, CA
Joined: 02.11.2009

Sep 11 @ 3:12 PM ET
Not worried
Michael Pachla
Buffalo Sabres
Location: solid!!!
Joined: 09.05.2007

Sep 11 @ 3:15 PM ET
trade johansson for a third rd pick

put tage in his slot, just saved another 3.6 mil



- navinrjohnson

i could get behind that if we needed to shed more salary...however, i'd really like cozens surrounded by competent vets or in he case of bennett, a young vet
Michael Pachla
Buffalo Sabres
Location: solid!!!
Joined: 09.05.2007

Sep 11 @ 3:16 PM ET
by the way Mike, i did like the roster, would love that trade spending to the cap or having an internal cap if indeed that happens.
- warsawkid

thx...me too
Michael Pachla
Buffalo Sabres
Location: solid!!!
Joined: 09.05.2007

Sep 11 @ 3:20 PM ET
Cutting budget and trading 8 is such a giant conflict.

Bit disappointed that you had to resort to a straight salary dump on Montour. Was looking forward to seeing you squirm a little harder to get down to that number. I think getting value on that kind of move is almost impossible this year. Not to say he can't be moved, but that it would bring back salary.

- Lunaion

moving no. 8 really hurts the farm system and it is a conflict...however, if they could get two picks back for montour (especially a 2nd and 3rd) it helps that loss a bit
Michael Pachla
Buffalo Sabres
Location: solid!!!
Joined: 09.05.2007

Sep 11 @ 3:20 PM ET
Not worried
- GERBE!!!75PTS
about?
SDSabre
Buffalo Sabres
Joined: 02.05.2014

Sep 11 @ 3:25 PM ET
No. Olosfson isn't a 1LW, and Skinner is a fringe 2LW. DeMelo is a solid RD, but in no way is he top pairing material. You need a 1RD, and a true 1LW. Cozens will certainly be an x-factor and you would need some serious results out of the prospect in his rookie season to help with these deficiencies.

IF you are able to acquire a true 1LW (Hall/Hoffman/Dadanov), then you'd be looking at a much more stable top 3 lines.

- bikeguy99


Hall is barely better then Skinner, and is about to sign the same contract. And when I say barely I'm not even certain that's true
Lunaion
Joined: 05.23.2016

Sep 11 @ 3:26 PM ET
moving no. 8 really hurts the farm system and it is a conflict...however, if they could get two picks back for montour (especially a 2nd and 3rd) it helps that loss a bit
- Michael Pachla


I don't think you can move him for picks. I think that's why the rumor of non-tendering him came up.

If 17 teams are working on restricted budgets, and 10 more already have cap problems (just a guess), then there's almost no money left. If you have it, you can use it on better things than Montour.
SDSabre
Buffalo Sabres
Joined: 02.05.2014

Sep 11 @ 3:27 PM ET



https://www.quanthockey.c...easons-players-stats.html

the guy is 8th in even strength goals for the last 5 years, but a fringe 2nd line player

- navinrjohnson


Play Skinner with Jack and VO on the first PP. This isn't hard.
Page: Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86  Next