Wanna blog? Start your own hockey blog with My HockeyBuzz. Register for free today!
 

Ducks should look to take bad contracts for future assets

August 8, 2021, 3:34 PM ET [6 Comments]
Ben Shelley
Anaheim Ducks Blogger • RSSArchiveCONTACT
Follow me on Twitter: @BenShelley_20
Follow HockeyBuzz Ducks on Twitter: @HB_Ducks


The Anaheim Ducks have stayed quiet so far this offseason and while it’s unlikely they’ll make any major additions, they shouldn’t be afraid to leverage their cap flexibility.

The team has about $17.5 million in cap space – not even including potential LTIR space from Ryan Kesler’s contract. Many teams around the league would likely still love to offload salary and Anaheim should recognize this and look to capitalize on it, considering the Ducks aren’t going to be competitive anytime soon. While trading some of their veterans could kickstart a full rebuild, the team shouldn’t hesitate to take on bad contracts as well, in exchange for future assets.

Just look at what the Arizona Coyotes have done. This offseason, they've acquired Loui Eriksson, Andrew Ladd, Anton Stralman, Jay Beagle, Antoine Roussel and Shayne Gostisbehere, in order to stockpile future assets. In taking on these bad contracts (along with dealing some roster players), the Coyotes have acquired a significant amount of assets, to the point where they’re now stocked with two first-round picks next year, as well as five second-round picks.

Now look at the New York Islanders, as an example. The Islanders would certainly be interested in getting rid of Thomas Hickey or Leo Komarov and if they were willing to give up a draft pick to do it, why wouldn’t the Ducks take advantage?

So far, Anaheim hasn’t really engaged in deals like this, with the David Backes trade being the only recent example. While we don’t know whether the team has an internal cap and there are also a couple restricted free agents still in need of contracts, the team isn’t anywhere near the salary cap and could likely afford to take on a couple contracts.

Cap space isn’t going to be a concern for the Ducks in the coming years, which is one of the few blessings of their current situation. If they’re able to take on some bad contracts in exchange for assets, they should certainly capitalize on the opportunity.



***NOTE: We've launched a HockeyBuzz Ducks Twitter account! For anyone interested, you can follow @HB_Ducks for updates on articles, Ducks news, etc.***

Do you think the Ducks should be willing to acquire bad contracts to add future assets?
Yes
No



Created with QuizMaker


OTHER ARTICLES FROM AUGUST

Looking at the Ducks' defense group after Haydn Fleury's departure
Sam Steel must take big step forward with Ducks next season
Ducks re-sign Isac Lundestrom and Sam Steel
Join the Discussion: » 6 Comments » Post New Comment
More from Ben Shelley
» Ducks register 39 shots but fall short against Blackhawks
» Ducks wrap up road trip with OT loss to Penguins
» Lukas Dostal and improved power play lead Ducks to win over Islanders
» Ducks lose both games of weekend back-to-back vs. Rangers and Devils
» Ducks’ four-game road trip will serve as good test