Interesting blog in light of Zach Rinaldo getting a ten minute misconduct on a "reputation call" during last nights Flyers/Sabres game.
Ive always felt that a ref making a call like that (IE a reputation call) is akin to a ref "diving". They are saying something happened that wasn't there in an attempt to make make the game easier for them.
- MBFlyerfan
It seems to me that Rinaldo and the Flyers were actually cut a break on the call when the ref elected to give him a
ten minute misconduct penalty under
Rule 75.4(iii) for approaching and attempting to
incite the Sabres' bench after Buffalo's
Ville Leino and the Flyers'
Jay Rosehill had already been sent off for concurrent minors when he could have just as easily given him a
two-minute minor for
Unportsmanlike Conduct under
Rule 75.2(i) which would have resulted in a
power-play for Buffalo. At the time the penalty was called the Flyers were only leading the game
2-1 in the third -- a period that has been their bĂȘte noire all season -- and the Sabres had already scored on an earlier power play. As a fourth line player Rinaldo only played
6:21 in the game in nine shifts so his sitting in the penalty box for ten minutes without forcing the Flyers to kill a third period penalty in a one goal game was both a break for the Flyers and the correct call for what Rinaldo had actually done.