Edler for Skinner. Then Edler can rub Staals leg for him.
- poisondhearts37

I like this trade talk. Like the old HB.

If the nucks move Edler it better be for a frickin scorer. Somebody who can put the puck in the net on the PP and in a shootout.

But if Edler goes it seems to me there's a hole in the D. Not much depth without him. And not any exciting prospects on the way, unless you think Kent Huskins can still play in the NHL (spoiler - he can't)

I like this trade talk. Like the old HB.

If the nucks move Edler it better be for a frickin scorer. Somebody who can put the puck in the net on the PP and in a shootout.

But if Edler goes it seems to me there's a hole in the D. Not much depth without him. And not any exciting prospects on the way, unless you think Kent Huskins can still play in the NHL (spoiler - he can't)
- Troutback

We need a top six player on that second line, or, we're (frank)ed!!!

Where's that #3 guy? SD advanced, rushing for nearly 200 yds. Apparently they're good again since they fired Turner.

We need a top six player on that second line, or, we're (frank)ed!!!
- LeftCoaster

Yeah, a legit top 6 guy that can shoot and pass. Problem is, there aren't too many of them available and will likely be soft.

Where's that #3 guy? SD advanced, rushing for nearly 200 yds. Apparently they're good again since they fired Turner.
- golfingsince

Did I not say they might win a game?

I did say they are the only team IMO that isn't good enough to run the table. And I'll stand by that

Did I not say they might win a game?

I did say they are the only team IMO that isn't good enough to run the table. And I'll stand by that
- Bieksa#3

It is unlikely they'll run the table. It is also unlikely that anybody outside Carolina, Seattle, SF, Denver or maybe NE do.

We need a top six player on that second line, or, we're (frank)ed!!!
- LeftCoaster

The team that has the top 6 depth and has serious needs elsewhere is the Oilers. The problem is that once again they're all soft.

It is unlikely they'll run the table. It is also unlikely that anybody outside Carolina, Seattle, SF, Denver or maybe NE do.
- golfingsince

As I said yesterday, I think SD was the only team that couldn't. Nobody is really that amazing. Hell look at ingys numbers against the playoff teams. If we are looking at actual seasons numbers they could be as scary as anybody

As I said yesterday, I think SD was the only team that couldn't. Nobody is really that amazing. Hell look at ingys numbers against the playoff teams. If we are looking at actual seasons numbers they could be as scary as anybody
- Bieksa#3

Sure, I guess GB could get hot too. Then again, so can SD. After all, they are the only remaining playoff team that beat the Colts this year.

That weather is one hell of a home field advantage.

Sure, I guess GB could get hot too. Then again, so can SD. After all, they are the only remaining playoff team that beat the Colts this year.
- golfingsince

SD played great today but what the hell was Dalton doing. A couple of those ints were just awful. Even last week against Baltimore was the same.
They said he now has 1 TD and 8int in the playoffs

We need a top six player on that second line, or, we're (frank)ed!!!
- LeftCoaster

No worries, our saviour Ben Ferriero has been called up from Utica.

Why not call up Jensen and play him with the Sedins can't be any worse than Hansen.

SD played great today but what the hell was Dalton doing. A couple of those ints were just awful. Even last week against Baltimore was the same.
They said he now has 1 TD and 8int in the playoffs
- Bieksa#3

Good gameplan by the Chargers too. Run the ball, take away from the strength of that Bengals D. Chargers improved to 6-2 against playoff teams.

2 time outs and a field goal. nice.

SD played great today but what the hell was Dalton doing. A couple of those ints were just awful. Even last week against Baltimore was the same.
They said he now has 1 TD and 8int in the playoffs
- Bieksa#3

It looked like he had money on SD.

2 time outs and a field goal. nice.
- poisondhearts37

They probably just wanted to get over to the heaters.

Yeah, but if he is set on FA then it won't matter if he's traded or not, he's still an UFA at season's end.

I just wonder what the market will be like for him. Been a while since he was ppg.
- 1970vintage

This is why I think we become sellers at TDL . Teams are looking for top forwards. Booth and Burrows can be dealt and make some room for youth.

He needs some sort of Swedish connection, Detroit or Colorado. I'll be disappointed if Gillis does nothing, on the other hand, his past moves have been crap, so nothing is probably better.
- LeftCoaster

TB

So if Edler would waive to go to Winnipeg, what else do you include? I think they'd want Lack.

We need a top six player on that second line, or, we're (frank)ed!!!
- LeftCoaster

That may be true but Gillis just gave out 4 NTC s and 2 NMC s since last year. He is not noted for reneging contracts.

I think he will buyout or trade Booth and at TDL ask a general question to his troops if anyone wants to be traded to a contender

So if Edler would waive to go to Winnipeg, what else do you include? I think they'd want Lack.
- golfingsince

You cant move Lack. Thats just a bad idea. Cant give away your only other option if Lou goes down.

No worries, our saviour Ben Ferriero has been called up from Utica.

Why not call up Jensen and play him with the Sedins can't be any worse than Hansen.
- Chest Rockwell

WTF is he

You cant move Lack. Thats just a bad idea. Cant give away your only other option if Lou goes down.
- poisondhearts37

Meh, back ups are available out there.

So if Edler would waive to go to Winnipeg, what else do you include? I think they'd want Lack.
- golfingsince

If I'm the Jets I trade buff, enstrom, little(I'm a Brian Little fan) for prospects